Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box G-S121-5, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Nov;236(11):3111-3124. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05262-8. Epub 2019 May 19.
Alcohol consumption in adolescents and emerging adults is a significant issue. However, our understanding of the topography of alcohol use within drinking episodes in this population is at a nascent stage.
This study characterized rate of alcohol consumption in the daily lives of problem drinkers ages 16-24 years (N = 75). We examined whether AUD symptoms and the presence of peers, factors relevant to alcohol consumption in youth, were associated with rate of consumption.
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) was used (N = 799). Rate of consumption was defined as change in estimated blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) relative to the start of the drinking episode. Piecewise multi-level modeling was used to test hypotheses. As a comparison, we examined whether indicators of quantity and frequency (Q-F) were associated with AUD symptoms and presence of peers.
For all participants, eBAC increased sharply early in the episode, then plateaued. Participants with more AUD symptoms or who were in the presence of peers had significantly steeper increases in eBAC over the early part of the episode. Participants with more AUD symptoms were also more likely to engage in binge-like behavior. For Q-F, only peak eBAC and peak number of standard drinks were associated with AUD symptoms, and not presence of peers.
Findings highlight the value of rate of consumption as an indicator of use in youth, one sensitive to the influence of relevant person-level and situational factors. Intervention efforts may benefit from targeting the speed at which youth drink.
青少年和刚成年的人群饮酒是一个严重的问题。然而,我们对于该人群饮酒过程中饮酒速度的理解还处于起步阶段。
本研究旨在描述 16-24 岁问题饮酒者日常生活中的饮酒速度(N=75)。我们探讨 AUD 症状和同伴的存在(与年轻人饮酒相关的因素)是否与饮酒速度有关。
使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)(N=799)。饮酒速度定义为饮酒过程中估计血液酒精浓度(eBAC)的变化相对于饮酒开始时的变化。分段多水平模型用于检验假设。作为比较,我们还检验了数量和频率(Q-F)的指标是否与 AUD 症状和同伴的存在有关。
对于所有参与者,eBAC 在饮酒过程的早期急剧上升,然后趋于平稳。AUD 症状较多或有同伴在场的参与者,eBAC 在早期阶段的上升幅度明显更大。AUD 症状较多的参与者也更有可能出现 binge-like 行为。对于 Q-F,只有峰值 eBAC 和峰值标准饮酒量与 AUD 症状有关,而与同伴的存在无关。
研究结果强调了饮酒速度作为年轻人饮酒指标的价值,该指标对相关个体水平和情境因素的影响敏感。干预措施可能受益于针对年轻人饮酒速度的目标。