Suppr超能文献

双语和单语年轻成年人在情绪 n-back 任务中的处理差异。

Processing differences between monolingual and bilingual young adults on an emotion n-back task.

机构信息

York University, Canada.

York University, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 2019 Aug;134:29-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 17.

Abstract

Bilingualism is associated with enhancement of executive control (EC) across the lifespan. Working memory and non-verbal emotion regulation both draw upon EC mechanisms so may also be affected by bilingualism, but these relationships are not fully understood. These relationships were explored using an n-back task with distracting emotional stimuli administered to young adults while continuous EEG was recorded. Monolinguals were faster but less accurate on the 2-back than bilinguals, and monolingual accuracy was more impeded by the presence of emotional stimuli than was that of bilinguals. The P300 event-related potential, a neural signature of working memory processing in the n-back, had smaller amplitudes in both groups on the 2-back than the 1-back, but attenuation in response to distracting emotional stimuli was greater for bilinguals than monolinguals. P300 latencies were also differentially affected by emotional stimuli in each group: Bilingual latencies were constant across emotions but monolingual latencies increased from neutral to angry conditions. In general, bilingual performance was less impacted by the emotional distraction than was that of the monolinguals. Additionally, bilinguals adjusted to the changing demands of the 1-back and 2-back conditions by recruiting neural networks to support different behavioral outcomes than monolinguals.

摘要

双语能力与整个生命周期的执行控制(EC)增强有关。工作记忆和非言语情绪调节都依赖于 EC 机制,因此也可能受到双语的影响,但这些关系尚未完全理解。通过在年轻成年人进行连续 EEG 记录的同时使用带有分心情绪刺激的 n-back 任务来探索这些关系。在 2-back 任务中,单语者比双语者更快但准确性更低,并且与双语者相比,情绪刺激的存在更会阻碍单语者的准确性。P300 事件相关电位是 n-back 工作记忆处理的神经标志,在 2-back 时,两个组的 P300 振幅都比 1-back 时小,但双语者对分心情绪刺激的反应衰减大于单语者。P300 潜伏期也因每组中的情绪刺激而受到不同的影响:双语者的潜伏期在不同情绪下保持不变,但单语者的潜伏期从中性到愤怒条件下增加。总的来说,双语者的表现受情绪干扰的影响小于单语者。此外,双语者通过招募神经网络来适应 1-back 和 2-back 条件的变化需求,从而支持与单语者不同的行为结果。

相似文献

1
Processing differences between monolingual and bilingual young adults on an emotion n-back task.
Brain Cogn. 2019 Aug;134:29-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 17.
2
Age-related effect on language control and executive control in bilingual and monolingual speakers: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107336. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107336. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Effects of bilingualism and aging on executive function and working memory.
Psychol Aging. 2014 Sep;29(3):696-705. doi: 10.1037/a0037254.
4
Increases in attentional demands are associated with language group differences in working memory performance.
Brain Cogn. 2021 Feb;147:105658. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105658. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
5
Task switching and bilingualism in young and older adults: A behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107186. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107186. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
Specific language impairment in language-minority children from low-income families.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Nov;49(6):736-47. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12107. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
7
Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review.
Psychol Bull. 2018 Apr;144(4):394-425. doi: 10.1037/bul0000142. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
8
ERP measures of the effects of age and bilingualism on working memory performance.
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Jun;143:107468. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107468. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
9
Neural differences in the temporal cascade of reactive and proactive control for bilinguals and monolinguals.
Psychophysiology. 2021 Jun;58(6):e13813. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13813. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
10
The role of nonverbal working memory in morphosyntactic processing by school-aged monolingual and bilingual children.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Feb;142:171-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.025. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Language switching is modulated by emotion priming: evidence from behavioral and event-related potentials study.
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 2;15:1373636. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1373636. eCollection 2024.
3
The ups and downs of bilingualism: A review of the literature on executive control using event-related potentials.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Aug;30(4):1187-1226. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02245-x. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
6
Am I truly monolingual? Exploring foreign language experiences in monolinguals.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 21;17(3):e0265563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265563. eCollection 2022.
7
How does bilingualism modify cognitive function? Attention to the mechanism.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1246-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02057-5. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
8
Differences in Working Memory With Emotional Distraction Between Proficient and Non-proficient Bilinguals.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 18;11:1414. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01414. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Working Memory With Emotional Distraction in Monolingual and Bilingual Children.
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 28;9:1582. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01582. eCollection 2018.
3
The language and social background questionnaire: Assessing degree of bilingualism in a diverse population.
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):250-263. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0867-9.
4
The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience.
Psychol Bull. 2017 Mar;143(3):233-262. doi: 10.1037/bul0000099.
5
The Impact of Early Bilingualism on Face Recognition Processes.
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 19;7:1080. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01080. eCollection 2016.
6
Behavioral and Electrophysiological Differences in Executive Control Between Monolingual and Bilingual Children.
Child Dev. 2016 Jul;87(4):1277-90. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12538. Epub 2016 May 2.
7
No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Feb;145(2):246-258. doi: 10.1037/xge0000120.
9
Processing emotional words in two languages with one brain: ERP and fMRI evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals.
Cortex. 2015 Oct;71:34-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
10
N170 sensitivity to facial expression: A meta-analysis.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Aug;55:498-509. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验