• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意力需求的增加与工作记忆表现中的语言群体差异有关。

Increases in attentional demands are associated with language group differences in working memory performance.

机构信息

York University, Toronto, Ontario.

York University, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 2021 Feb;147:105658. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105658. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105658
PMID:33341655
Abstract

One approach to resolving the controversy over whether bilingualism affects executive function (EF) performance has been to identify the specific tasks and populations that might show these effects. The assumption is that the effect of bilingualism reliably occurs with some tasks and populations but not others and that identifying those conditions will settle outstanding contradictions. However, it is now clear that experiments using the same task (e.g., flanker, Simon, etc.) and apparently the same populations (monolingual or bilingual participants) still lead to different outcomes. Therefore, something in addition to these factors must determine performance. The present study tested the hypothesis that changes in demands for attentional control within a task is associated with performance differences for groups with different attentional resources, in this case, monolingual and bilingual participants. Sixty-four young adults who were classified as monolingual or bilingual based on a detailed questionnaire completed four increasingly difficult conditions of an n-back task while EEG was recorded. Behavioral results showed greater declines with increasing difficulty for monolinguals than bilinguals, and electrophysiological results revealed more effortful processing by monolinguals across all conditions. Our interpretation is that demands for attentional control by the task in conjunction with assessments of attentional resources in individuals or groups determines performance on executive function tasks. These results lead to a re-examination of how executive function is conceptualized and the role of bilingualism in performance on these tasks.

摘要

解决双语是否影响执行功能 (EF) 表现这一争议的一种方法是确定可能显示这些影响的特定任务和人群。假设双语对某些任务和人群的影响是可靠的,但对其他任务和人群则没有影响,并且确定这些条件将解决未解决的矛盾。然而,现在很清楚,即使使用相同的任务(例如,flanker、Simon 等)和显然相同的人群(单语或双语参与者)进行实验,仍然会导致不同的结果。因此,除了这些因素之外,一定还有其他因素决定了表现。本研究检验了一个假设,即在任务中注意力控制需求的变化与具有不同注意力资源的群体(在这种情况下,单语者和双语者)的表现差异有关。64 名年轻成年人根据详细的问卷被分类为单语或双语者,他们在完成 n 次回任务的四个难度递增的条件时记录了脑电图。行为结果表明,单语者的难度增加时表现下降幅度大于双语者,而电生理结果表明,在所有条件下,单语者的处理都需要更多的努力。我们的解释是,任务对注意力控制的需求以及对个体或群体注意力资源的评估决定了执行功能任务的表现。这些结果导致重新审视执行功能的概念化方式以及双语在这些任务中的表现作用。

相似文献

1
Increases in attentional demands are associated with language group differences in working memory performance.注意力需求的增加与工作记忆表现中的语言群体差异有关。
Brain Cogn. 2021 Feb;147:105658. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105658. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Age-related effect on language control and executive control in bilingual and monolingual speakers: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.年龄对双语和单语使用者语言控制和执行控制的影响:行为和电生理证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107336. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107336. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Processing differences between monolingual and bilingual young adults on an emotion n-back task.双语和单语年轻成年人在情绪 n-back 任务中的处理差异。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Aug;134:29-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 17.
4
Specific language impairment in language-minority children from low-income families.低收入家庭中语言少数群体儿童的特定语言障碍。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Nov;49(6):736-47. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12107. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
5
A behavioural and electrophysiological investigation of the effect of bilingualism on aging and cognitive control.双语对衰老和认知控制影响的行为与电生理研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 8;94:23-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Nov 20.
6
Executive functioning during verbal fluency tasks in bilinguals: A systematic review.双语者言语流畅性任务中的执行功能:系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jul-Aug;58(4):1316-1334. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12855. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
7
The Relationship Between Bilingualism and Control Aspect of Intelligence: A Study of Persian-speaking Individuals.双语能力与智力控制方面的关系:对说波斯语者的一项研究
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2023 Mar-Apr;14(2):237-246. doi: 10.32598/bcn.2022.2777.2. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
8
The effect of bilingualism on executive functions when languages are similar: a comparison between Hungarian-Serbian and Slovak-Serbian young adult bilinguals.双语对执行功能的影响:相似语言背景下的匈牙利语-塞尔维亚语和斯洛伐克语-塞尔维亚语成年双语者的比较。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Apr;51(3):561-581. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01345-8. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
9
Parietal lobe volume distinguishes attentional control in bilinguals and monolinguals: A structural MRI study.顶叶体积区分双语者和单语者的注意力控制:一项结构 MRI 研究。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Aug;134:103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
10
Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children.双语儿童和单语儿童的工作记忆发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Feb;114(2):187-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
How psychopathic traits affect individuals' trust decisions and outcome evaluations: preliminary ERP evidence.心理变态特质如何影响个体的信任决策和结果评估:初步的事件相关电位证据
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02965-w.
2
Bilingualism modifies cognition through adaptation, not transfer.双语能力通过适应而非迁移来改变认知。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Nov;28(11):987-997. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.07.012. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
Lasting enhancements in neural efficiency by multi-session transcranial direct current stimulation during working memory training.
在工作记忆训练期间,通过多疗程经颅直流电刺激实现神经效率的持久提升。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2023 Nov 2;8(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s41539-023-00200-y.
4
Multilingualism is associated with small task-specific advantages in cognitive performance of older adults.多语言能力与老年人在认知表现方面的特定小任务优势相关。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 7;13(1):16912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43961-7.
5
Differences between Monolinguals and Bilinguals in Phonetic and Phonological Learning and the Connection with Auditory Sensory Memory.单语者和双语者在语音和音系学习方面的差异以及与听觉感觉记忆的联系。
Brain Sci. 2023 Mar 14;13(3):488. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030488.
6
The Multifaceted Nature of Bilingualism and Attention.双语能力与注意力的多面性
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 3;13:910382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910382. eCollection 2022.
7
How does bilingualism modify cognitive function? Attention to the mechanism.双语如何改变认知功能?关注机制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1246-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02057-5. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
8
Bilingualism as a Slice of Swiss Cheese.双语现象就像一片瑞士奶酪。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 8;12:769323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769323. eCollection 2021.
9
Does language context impact the neural correlates of executive control in monolingual and multilingual young adults?语言语境是否会影响单语和双语年轻成年人执行控制的神经相关性?
Brain Lang. 2021 Nov;222:105011. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105011. Epub 2021 Aug 26.