Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194186. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4186.
Breastfeeding and exposure to ambient air pollutants have been found to be independently associated with respiratory health in children; however, previous studies have not examined the association of breastfeeding as a potential moderator of the association.
To assess associations of breastfeeding and air pollution with lung function in children.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using a cross-sectional study design, children were recruited from 62 elementary and middle schools located in 7 Chinese cities from April 1, 2012, to October 31, 2013. Data analyses were conducted from November 1, 2018, to March 31, 2019.
Long-term concentrations of airborne particulate matter with a diameter of 1 μm or less (PM1), airborne particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 μm or less (PM2.5), airborne particulate matter with a diameter of 10 μm or less (PM10), and nitrogen dioxide were estimated using a spatial statistical model matched to children's geocoded home addresses, and concentrations of PM10, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone were measured by local air monitoring stations.
Breastfeeding was defined as maternal report of having mainly breastfed for longer than 3 months. Lung function was measured using portable electronic spirometers. Using previously published predicted spirometric values for children in Northeast China as the reference, lung impairment was defined as forced vital capacity (FVC) less than 85%, forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration less than 85%, peak expiratory flow less than 75%, or maximum midexpiratory flow less than 75%.
Participants included 6740 children (mean [SD] age, 11.6 [2.1] years; 3382 boys [50.2%]). There were 4751 children (70.5%) who were breastfed. Mean (SD) particulate matter concentrations ranged from 46.8 (6.5) μg/m3 for PM1 to 95.6 (9.8) μg/m3 for PM10. The prevalence of lung function impairment ranged from 6.8% for peak expiratory flow to 11.3% for FVC. After controlling for age, sex, and other covariates, 1-interquartile range greater concentration of pollutants was associated with higher adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for lung function impairment by FVC among children who were not breastfed compared with those who were (PM1: AOR, 2.71 [95% CI, 2.02-3.63] vs 1.20 [95% CI, 0.97-1.48]; PM2.5: AOR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.79-2.88] vs 1.26 [95% CI, 1.04-1.51]; and PM10: AOR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.58-2.37] vs 1.46 [95% CI, 1.23-1.73]). Younger age (<12 years) was associated with lower lung function impairment among the children who had been breastfed. In children from elementary schools, 1-interquartile range greater concentration of pollutants was associated with higher AORs for lung function impairment by FVC among children who had not been breastfed compared with those who had (PM1: AOR, 6.43 [95% CI, 3.97-10.44] vs 1.89 [95% CI, 1.28-2.80]; PM2.5: AOR, 3.83 [95% CI, 2.63-5.58] vs 1.50 [95% CI, 1.12-2.01]; and PM10: AOR, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.90-3.57] vs 1.52 [95% CI, 1.19-1.95]). Results from linear regression models also showed associations of air pollution with worse lung function among children who were not breastfed compared with their counterparts who were breastfed, especially for FVC (PM1: β, -240.46 [95% CI, -288.71 to -192.21] vs -38.21 [95% CI, -69.27 to -7.16] mL) and forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (PM1: β, -201.37 [95% CI, -242.08 to -160.65] vs -30.30 [95% CI, -57.66 to -2.94] mL).
In this study, breastfeeding was associated with lower risk of lung function impairment among children in China exposed to air pollution, particularly among younger children.
重要性:母乳喂养和暴露于环境空气污染物已被发现与儿童的呼吸健康独立相关;然而,以前的研究并未检查母乳喂养作为关联的潜在调节剂的作用。
目的:评估母乳喂养和空气污染与儿童肺功能的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:使用横断面研究设计,于 2012 年 4 月 1 日至 2013 年 10 月 31 日从中国 7 个城市的 62 所小学和中学招募儿童。数据分析于 2018 年 11 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日进行。
暴露:使用与儿童地理位置匹配的空间统计模型来估计直径为 1 μm 或以下的空气中颗粒物(PM1)、直径为 2.5 μm 或以下的空气中颗粒物(PM2.5)、直径为 10 μm 或以下的空气中颗粒物(PM10)和二氧化氮的长期浓度,而 PM10、二氧化硫、二氧化氮和臭氧的浓度则由当地空气监测站进行测量。
主要结果和测量:母乳喂养的定义是母亲报告主要母乳喂养时间超过 3 个月。使用先前发表的针对中国东北地区儿童的预测肺活量值作为参考,肺功能障碍定义为用力肺活量(FVC)小于 85%、第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)小于 85%、呼气峰值流量(PEF)小于 75%或最大中期呼气流量(MMEF)小于 75%。
结果:参与者包括 6740 名儿童(平均[SD]年龄,11.6[2.1]岁;3382 名男孩[50.2%])。有 4751 名儿童(70.5%)接受母乳喂养。颗粒物浓度的平均值(SD)范围从 PM1 的 46.8(6.5)μg/m3到 PM10 的 95.6(9.8)μg/m3。肺功能障碍的患病率范围从 PEF 的 6.8%到 FVC 的 11.3%。在控制年龄、性别和其他协变量后,与母乳喂养的儿童相比,未母乳喂养的儿童中,污染物浓度每增加 1 个四分位距,与 FVC 肺功能障碍的调整后优势比(AOR)越高(PM1:AOR,2.71[95%CI,2.02-3.63] vs 1.20[95%CI,0.97-1.48];PM2.5:AOR,2.27[95%CI,1.79-2.88] vs 1.26[95%CI,1.04-1.51];和 PM10:AOR,1.93[95%CI,1.58-2.37] vs 1.46[95%CI,1.23-1.73])。年龄较小(<12 岁)与母乳喂养儿童的肺功能障碍较低有关。在来自小学的儿童中,与母乳喂养的儿童相比,未母乳喂养的儿童中,污染物浓度每增加 1 个四分位距,与 FVC 肺功能障碍的 AOR 越高(PM1:AOR,6.43[95%CI,3.97-10.44] vs 1.89[95%CI,1.28-2.80];PM2.5:AOR,3.83[95%CI,2.63-5.58] vs 1.50[95%CI,1.12-2.01];和 PM10:AOR,2.61[95%CI,1.90-3.57] vs 1.52[95%CI,1.19-1.95])。线性回归模型的结果也显示,与母乳喂养的儿童相比,未母乳喂养的儿童中,空气污染与肺功能更差之间存在关联,尤其是 FVC(PM1:β,-240.46[95%CI,-288.71 至-192.21] vs -38.21[95%CI,-69.27 至-7.16]mL)和 FEV1(PM1:β,-201.37[95%CI,-242.08 至-160.65] vs -30.30[95%CI,-57.66 至-2.94]mL)。
结论和相关性:在这项研究中,母乳喂养与中国暴露于空气污染的儿童肺功能障碍风险降低相关,尤其是在年龄较小的儿童中。