• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项案例研究调查了在不同处理机制下影响溪流中微塑料浓度的时间因素。

A case study investigating temporal factors that influence microplastic concentration in streams under different treatment regimes.

机构信息

Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.

Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(21):21797-21807. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04663-8. Epub 2019 May 27.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-019-04663-8
PMID:31134548
Abstract

Microplastics, particles less than 5 mm in size, are an emerging contaminant in waterways worldwide. Most microplastic studies focus on spatial trends in concentration, but in systems as dynamic as rivers, to draw conclusions from existing spatial studies, we must first examine how microplastic concentrations may change with time and flow conditions. In this study, we investigate how microplastic concentrations change over a 24-h period and between seasonally high and low flows. We do this in two streams, controlling for wastewater treatment strategy: one stream in a watershed where waste is treated with septic systems and the other receiving wastewater treatment plant effluent. We hypothesized that a stream with wastewater treatment plant effluent would exhibit higher and more variable microplastic concentrations than a stream in a watershed with septic systems. Results indicate, however, that there is no significant difference between the two streams despite their differing treatment strategies. Additionally, no significant variation in concentrations was measured over two 24-h sampling campaigns. There was, however, significantly higher concentrations measured in summer low flow conditions relative to spring high flow conditions across both sampled streams (p value <0.001), indicating that increases in stream discharge unrelated to storm events dilute and decrease measured microplastic concentrations. From this, we learn that pairing measured concentrations with a description of flow conditions at sampling time is a requisite for a robust microplastic literature that allows for comparisons between existing spatial studies and extrapolations to global loads.

摘要

微塑料是一种粒径小于 5 毫米的新兴污染物,在全球水道中普遍存在。大多数微塑料研究都集中在浓度的空间趋势上,但在像河流这样动态的系统中,要从现有空间研究中得出结论,我们必须首先研究微塑料浓度如何随时间和水流条件而变化。在这项研究中,我们调查了微塑料浓度在 24 小时内和季节性高、低流量之间的变化情况。我们在两个溪流中进行了研究,控制了废水处理策略:一个溪流所在的流域使用化粪池系统处理废物,另一个溪流则接收废水处理厂的废水。我们假设,与使用化粪池系统的流域中的溪流相比,接收废水处理厂废水的溪流中微塑料浓度会更高且更具变异性。然而,结果表明,尽管这两个溪流的处理策略不同,但它们之间没有显著差异。此外,在两次为期 24 小时的采样活动中,浓度没有明显变化。然而,在两个采样溪流中,夏季低流量条件下的浓度明显高于春季高流量条件下的浓度(p 值<0.001),这表明与风暴事件无关的溪流排放增加会稀释并降低测量的微塑料浓度。由此可知,将测量浓度与采样时的水流条件描述相结合是建立稳健的微塑料文献的必要条件,这可以使现有空间研究之间进行比较,并将其外推到全球负荷。

相似文献

1
A case study investigating temporal factors that influence microplastic concentration in streams under different treatment regimes.一项案例研究调查了在不同处理机制下影响溪流中微塑料浓度的时间因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(21):21797-21807. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04663-8. Epub 2019 May 27.
2
Microplastic pollution in streams spanning an urbanisation gradient.河流中微塑料污染的城市化梯度分析
Environ Pollut. 2019 Jul;250:292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.105. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
3
Impacts of baseflow and flooding on microplastic pollution in an effluent-dependent arid land river in the USA.基流和洪水对美国一条依赖污水的干旱地区河流中微塑料污染的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(33):45375-45389. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13724-w. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
4
Temporal variation of the microplastic concentration in a stream that receives discharge from wastewater treatment plants.受污水处理厂排放影响的溪流中微塑料浓度的时间变化。
Environ Pollut. 2024 Jan 1;340(Pt 1):122776. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122776. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
5
Citizen science sampling programs as a technique for monitoring microplastic pollution: results, lessons learned and recommendations for working with volunteers for monitoring plastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems.公民科学采样项目作为监测微塑料污染的一种技术:结果、经验教训以及与志愿者合作监测淡水生态系统中塑料污染的建议。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Feb 19;191(3):172. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7297-3.
6
Influence of wastewater treatment plant discharges on microplastic concentrations in surface water.污水处理厂排放对地表水中微塑料浓度的影响。
Chemosphere. 2016 Nov;162:277-84. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.083. Epub 2016 Aug 7.
7
A watershed-scale, citizen science approach to quantifying microplastic concentration in a mixed land-use river.流域尺度的公民科学方法定量分析混合土地利用河流中的微塑料浓度。
Water Res. 2018 Dec 15;147:382-392. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
Spatial distribution of microplastics in a large watershed: a case study of the Ottawa River watershed.大型流域中微塑料的空间分布:以渥太华河流域为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 May 8;195(6):645. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11277-8.
9
Freshwater microplastic concentrations vary through both space and time.淡水微塑料浓度在空间和时间上都有变化。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Aug;263(Pt B):114481. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114481. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
10
A long-term, multitrophic level study to assess pulp and paper mill effluent effects on aquatic communities in four US receiving waters: characteristics of the study streams, sample sites, mills, and mill effluents.一项长期的多营养级研究,旨在评估美国四个受纳水体中纸浆和造纸厂废水对水生群落的影响:研究溪流、采样地点、工厂及工厂废水的特征
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Apr;5(2):199-218. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2008-054.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Snapshot Sampling May Not Be Enough to Obtain Robust Estimates for Riverine Microplastic Loads.快照采样可能不足以获得对河流微塑料负荷的可靠估计。
ACS ES T Water. 2024 Apr 12;4(5):2309-2319. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.4c00176. eCollection 2024 May 10.
2
Microplastic sampling techniques in freshwaters and sediments: a review.淡水和沉积物中的微塑料采样技术:综述
Environ Chem Lett. 2021;19(6):4225-4252. doi: 10.1007/s10311-021-01227-6. Epub 2021 May 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Virgin microplastics are not causing imminent harm to fish after dietary exposure.经口摄入后,原始微塑料尚未对鱼类造成即刻危害。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 May;130:123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
2
A meta-analysis of the effects of exposure to microplastics on fish and aquatic invertebrates.暴露于微塑料对鱼类和水生无脊椎动物影响的荟萃分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Aug 1;631-632:550-559. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.046. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
3
Effects of microplastic exposure on the body condition and behaviour of planktivorous reef fish (Acanthochromis polyacanthus).
微塑料暴露对草食性礁鱼(棘颊雀鲷)身体状况和行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):e0193308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193308. eCollection 2018.
4
Synthetic and non-synthetic anthropogenic fibers in a river under the impact of Paris Megacity: Sampling methodological aspects and flux estimations.河流中人为合成与非合成纤维:采样方法学方面及通量估算,受巴黎大都市影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Mar 15;618:157-164. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
5
Are We Underestimating Microplastic Contamination in Aquatic Environments?我们是否低估了水生环境中的微塑料污染?
Environ Manage. 2018 Jan;61(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0947-8. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
6
Export of Plastic Debris by Rivers into the Sea.河流向海洋输出的塑料碎片。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Nov 7;51(21):12246-12253. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02368. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
7
Risks of Plastic Debris: Unravelling Fact, Opinion, Perception, and Belief.塑料垃圾的风险:揭示事实、观点、认知和信念。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Oct 17;51(20):11513-11519. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02219. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
8
Microplastic sampling with the AVANI trawl compared to two neuston trawls in the Bay of Bengal and South Pacific.在孟加拉湾和南太平洋,将AVANI拖网与两种海洋表层拖网用于微塑料采样的比较。
Environ Pollut. 2018 Jan;232:430-439. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.058. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
River plastic emissions to the world's oceans.河流向世界海洋排放的塑料污染物。
Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 7;8:15611. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15611.
10
Abundance and composition of near surface microplastics and plastic debris in the Stockholm Archipelago, Baltic Sea.波罗的海斯德哥尔摩群岛近地表微塑料和塑料碎片的丰度及组成
Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 Jul 15;120(1-2):292-302. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.04.062. Epub 2017 May 18.