Suppr超能文献

PD-L1 检测分析方法的比较及其在弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤评估中的意义。

Comparison of PD-L1 detection assays and corresponding significance in evaluation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Pathology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2019 Jul;8(8):3831-3845. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2316. Epub 2019 May 31.

Abstract

The expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a biomarker for immunotherapy, but approved detection method is absent in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Here, we performed three methods including immunohistochemistry (IHC) (clone SP263 and SP142), RNAscope, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to evaluate PD-L1 status on a cohort of DLBCL including 94 of DLBCL-NOS, 25 of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and 7 of double-hit lymphoma (DHL). SP263 with 25% for immune cell (IC) or combined cell and SP142 with 10% for tumor cell (TC), 20% for both of IC and combined cell were proved to have corresponding survival prognostic. Combined showed comparable prognostic value with TC and IC . SP263 and SP142 showed strong concordance (k = 0.788) with combined rates of 33.3% (42/126) and 34.9% (44/126), respectively. In DLBCL-NOS, TC by SP263 preferred to non-GCB and immunoblastic variant DLBCL-NOS (P = 0.029 and P = 0.004). Combined (SP263 and SP142) were associated with more than one extranodal site involved (P = 0.006, P = 0.042), higher ECOG PS scores (P = 0.001, P < 0.001), high IPI risk (P = 0.012, P = 0.005), and poor treatment response (P = 0.095, P = 0.002). IC by SP263 and SP142 were both independent risk factors (P = 0.027, P = 0.037). 9p24.1 locus amplification and gain were identified in 4.3% and 7.6% DLBCL-NOS and indicated shorter overall survival (P = 0.004). Positive rate of PD-L1 by RNAscope was 36.5%, while no clinical significance shown. PD-L1 positive rates were all higher in PMBCL and DHL than in DLBCL-NOS by SP263, SP142, RNAscope, and FISH (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.005 and P < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, combined PD-L1 expression by IHC was potentially reliable and convenient as a predicting biomarker. SP263 staining was easier to evaluate and recognized more PD-L1-stained cells, but SP142 presented a better prognostic indicator. FISH and RNAscope could be used as supplementary assays. PMBCL itself was a sensitive cohort for immunotherapy.

摘要

程序性细胞死亡配体 1(PD-L1)的表达是免疫治疗的生物标志物,但在弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)中缺乏批准的检测方法。在这里,我们使用三种方法,包括免疫组织化学(IHC)(克隆 SP263 和 SP142)、RNAscope 和荧光原位杂交(FISH),对包括 94 例弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤非特指型(DLBCL-NOS)、25 例原发性纵隔大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(PMBCL)和 7 例双打击淋巴瘤(DHL)在内的 DLBCL 队列进行 PD-L1 状态评估。SP263 的免疫细胞(IC)或联合细胞的 25%,SP142 的肿瘤细胞(TC)的 10%,IC 和联合细胞的 20%被证明具有相应的生存预后。联合显示与 TC 和 IC 具有可比的预后价值。SP263 和 SP142 与联合率为 33.3%(42/126)和 34.9%(44/126)的联合显示出较强的一致性(k=0.788)。在 DLBCL-NOS 中,TC 由 SP263 染色更倾向于非生发中心 B 细胞和免疫母细胞型 DLBCL-NOS(P=0.029 和 P=0.004)。联合(SP263 和 SP142)与超过一个结外部位受累相关(P=0.006,P=0.042),ECOG PS 评分较高(P=0.001,P<0.001),国际预后指数(IPI)风险较高(P=0.012,P=0.005),治疗反应较差(P=0.095,P=0.002)。SP263 和 SP142 的 IC 都是独立的危险因素(P=0.027,P=0.037)。9p24.1 基因座扩增和获得在 4.3%和 7.6%的 DLBCL-NOS 中被识别,并且提示总生存期更短(P=0.004)。RNAscope 检测到的 PD-L1 阳性率为 36.5%,但无临床意义。PMBCL 和 DHL 中 SP263、SP142、RNAscope 和 FISH 检测到的 PD-L1 阳性率均高于 DLBCL-NOS(P=0.001,P<0.001,P=0.005 和 P<0.001)。总之,IHC 联合 PD-L1 表达可能是一种可靠且方便的预测生物标志物。SP263 染色更容易评估,并且识别出更多的 PD-L1 染色细胞,但 SP142 呈现出更好的预后指标。FISH 和 RNAscope 可作为补充检测方法。PMBCL 本身是一个对免疫治疗敏感的队列。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5944/6639200/66e5bea21543/CAM4-8-3831-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验