• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别对不同生命阶段嗅觉识别能力的影响:一项荟萃分析。

Effect of gender on odor identification at different life stages: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, 399 Chang Hai Road, Shanghai, 200438, P.R. China.

出版信息

Rhinology. 2019 Oct 1;57(5):322-330. doi: 10.4193/Rhin19.005.

DOI:10.4193/Rhin19.005
PMID:31152646
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although conflicting findings abound, gender-related differences in olfactory identification have received continuous attention. To our best knowledge, no systematic and quantitative research has examined gender differences in olfaction identification at various stages of life. The present study aimed to find out if there is gender difference in human olfaction identification in different life stages.

METHODOLOGY

Studies cited in the PubMed database were searched from its inception to August 2017 using the terms "olfact" or "smell" and "gender" or "sex". The effect size of each comparison was calculated. 24 studies were included in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, we used Cohen's d to determine the effects sizes for the comparisons between women versus men among different groups. Its value was 0.18 (95% CI: -0.13 to 0.49) in Group A (age less than 18 years), 0.62 (95% CI: 0.43 to 0.81) in Group B (age 18-50 years), and 0.33 (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.66) in Group C. The effect was considered relatively small in Group A (age less than 18 years) and Group C (age more than 50 years), and a medium effect in Group B (age 18-50 years). Moreover, a significant difference was only present in Group B (age 18-50 years). Summarizing, the gender effect was only present in the group aged 18-50 years, in which women outperformed men significantly in odor identification.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analytic review indicated that the gender differences only exist in young adults (age 18-50 years), while absent in juveniles (age less than 18 years) or an aged cohort (age more than 50 years). Females outperformed males in the young adults.

摘要

背景

尽管存在相互矛盾的发现,但性别与嗅觉识别之间的差异一直受到持续关注。据我们所知,尚无系统的定量研究在人生的各个阶段检查嗅觉识别的性别差异。本研究旨在探讨不同生命阶段人类嗅觉识别是否存在性别差异。

方法

从 2017 年 8 月开始,我们在 PubMed 数据库中使用“olfact”或“smell”和“gender”或“sex”等术语搜索引用的研究。计算了每个比较的效应大小。本荟萃分析纳入了 24 项研究。

结果

在本荟萃分析中,我们使用 Cohen 的 d 来确定不同组中女性与男性之间比较的效应大小。其值在 A 组(年龄小于 18 岁)中为 0.18(95%CI:-0.13 至 0.49),在 B 组(18-50 岁)中为 0.62(95%CI:0.43 至 0.81),在 C 组中为 0.33(95%CI:-0.01 至 0.66)。在 A 组(年龄小于 18 岁)和 C 组(年龄大于 50 岁)中,这种效应被认为相对较小,而在 B 组(18-50 岁)中则为中等效应。此外,仅在 B 组(18-50 岁)中存在显著差异。总之,性别效应仅存在于 18-50 岁的年龄段,女性在气味识别方面明显优于男性。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,性别差异仅存在于年轻成年人(18-50 岁)中,而在青少年(年龄小于 18 岁)或老年组(年龄大于 50 岁)中不存在。在年轻成年人中,女性的表现优于男性。

相似文献

1
Effect of gender on odor identification at different life stages: a meta-analysis.性别对不同生命阶段嗅觉识别能力的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Rhinology. 2019 Oct 1;57(5):322-330. doi: 10.4193/Rhin19.005.
2
Initiation of the age-related decline of odor identification in humans: A meta-analysis.人类嗅觉识别随年龄下降的起始:一项荟萃分析。
Ageing Res Rev. 2017 Nov;40:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
3
Identification of odors of edible and nonedible stimuli as affected by age and gender.可食用和不可食用刺激物气味的识别受年龄和性别的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):752-9. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.752.
4
Odor Sensitivity Versus Odor Identification in Older US Adults: Associations With Cognition, Age, Gender, and Race.老年人嗅觉敏感性与嗅觉识别能力的比较:与认知、年龄、性别和种族的关系。
Chem Senses. 2020 May 21;45(4):321-330. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa018.
5
The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.气味感知不能作为化学暴露的替代标志物:影响人类气味感知的因素综述。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 Feb;51(2):70-6. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.767908.
6
Olfactory function in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis.轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病中的嗅觉功能:一项荟萃分析。
Laryngoscope. 2019 Feb;129(2):362-369. doi: 10.1002/lary.27399. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Updated Sniffin' Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects.基于9139名受试者的扩展样本更新的嗅觉棒常模数据。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;276(3):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5248-1. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
8
Evaluation of "Open Essence" odor-identification test card by application to healthy volunteers.通过应用于健康志愿者对“开放精华”气味识别测试卡进行评估。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013 Feb;40(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 May 15.
9
Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects.“嗅觉棒”的标准化数据,包括气味识别、气味辨别和嗅觉阈值测试:基于3000多名受试者的更新。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Mar;264(3):237-43. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0. Epub 2006 Sep 23.
10
Semantic context facilitates odor identification in children and adults.语义语境有助于儿童和成人识别气味。
Dev Psychobiol. 2014 Apr;56(3):592-8. doi: 10.1002/dev.21124. Epub 2013 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Nomogram for predicting olfactory disorder in obstructive sleep apnea: A retrospective study based on a multicenter database.用于预测阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停嗅觉障碍的列线图:基于多中心数据库的回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 27;20(3):e0318145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318145. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the relaxation effects of Shikuwasa (Citrus depressa Hayata) essential oil inhalation in young female adults: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估年轻成年女性吸入酸橘(扁实柠檬)精油的放松效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Jul 26;41:101342. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101342. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Factors influencing olfactory function in an adult general population sample: the CHRIS study.
成人一般人群样本中嗅觉功能的影响因素:CHRIS 研究。
Chem Senses. 2024 Jan 1;49. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjae011.
4
Normative data for the Vietnamese smell identification test.越南嗅觉识别测试的标准数据。
Clin Park Relat Disord. 2023 Oct 17;9:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2023.100222. eCollection 2023.
5
Olfactory-gustatory simultaneity judgments: A preliminary study on the congruency-dependent temporal window of multisensory binding.嗅觉-味觉同时性判断:多感觉捆绑的一致性依赖时窗的初步研究。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jan;13(1):e2821. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2821. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
6
Intranasal Corticosteroid Treatment on Recovery of Long-Term Olfactory Dysfunction Due to COVID-19.鼻内皮质类固醇治疗 COVID-19 引起的长期嗅觉功能障碍的恢复。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Nov;132(11):2209-2216. doi: 10.1002/lary.30353. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
7
Long-Term Subjective and Objective Assessment of Smell and Taste in COVID-19.COVID-19 患者嗅觉和味觉的长期主观和客观评估
Cells. 2022 Feb 24;11(5):788. doi: 10.3390/cells11050788.
8
Measured and self-reported olfactory function in voluntary Norwegian adults.挪威成年人自愿进行的嗅觉功能的测量和自我报告。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Oct;279(10):4925-4933. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07298-7. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
9
Olfactory Performance among Hospital Residents.医院住院医师的嗅觉表现
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Feb 19;26(1):e032-e037. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1719122. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
Olfactory dysfunction in the scenario of COVID-19 pandemic in patients screened by the telemonitoring.通过远程监测筛查的COVID-19大流行情况下患者的嗅觉功能障碍
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2021 Oct 11;19:eAO6204. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6204. eCollection 2021.