• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Online patient feedback: a cross-sectional survey of the attitudes and experiences of United Kingdom health care professionals.在线患者反馈:英国医疗保健专业人员的态度和经验的横断面调查。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019 Oct;24(4):235-244. doi: 10.1177/1355819619844540. Epub 2019 Jun 2.
2
Consent to transfusion: patients' and healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the provision of blood transfusion information.输血同意书:患者及医护人员对提供输血信息的态度
Transfus Med. 2012 Jun;22(3):167-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2012.01148.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
3
Palliative care on the net: an online survey of health care professionals.网络上的姑息治疗:对医疗保健专业人员的在线调查。
J Palliat Care. 2001 Spring;17(1):41-5.
4
Nurses' Perspectives on Patient Satisfaction and Expectations: An International Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice.护士对患者满意度和期望的看法:一项具有循证实践意义的国际横断面多中心研究。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Jun;13(3):185-96. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12143. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
5
Health care providers' attitudes towards transfer and transition in young persons with long term illness- a web-based survey.医疗服务提供者对患有长期疾病的年轻人转诊和过渡的态度——一项基于网络的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 11;17(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2192-5.
6
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?360度反馈调查结果与患者满意度指标有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.
7
Comparisons of Physicians', Nurses', and Social Welfare Professionals' Experiences With Participation in Information System Development: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.医生、护士和社会福利专业人员参与信息系统开发的经历比较:横断面调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jan 22;12:e51495. doi: 10.2196/51495.
8
Attitudes towards homosexuality in a sample of health professionals from the region of Sfax, Tunisia.突尼斯斯法克斯地区医疗专业人员样本中对同性恋的态度。
Presse Med. 2019 Sep;48(9):991-994. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
9
A cross sectional survey of the UK public to understand use of online ratings and reviews of health services.横断面调查英国公众对在线健康服务评分和评论的使用情况。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Sep;101(9):1690-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
10
Attitudes towards patient safety among physicians and nurses in Iranian governmental teaching hospitals: a cross-sectional survey.伊朗政府教学医院医生和护士对患者安全的态度:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 11;14(11):e089328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089328.

引用本文的文献

1
A Taxonomy for Health Information Systems.健康信息系统分类法。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 31;26:e47682. doi: 10.2196/47682.
2
Developing a Tool for Assessing the Process of Seeking Health Information: Online Think-Aloud Method.开发一种评估健康信息寻求过程的工具:在线出声思考法。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 17;12(10):1039. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101039.
3
Developing a research community within an online healthcare feedback platform.在在线医疗反馈平台中培养研究社区。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):705-714. doi: 10.1111/hex.13696. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
4
A Pilot Study Conducting Online Think Aloud Qualitative Method during Social Distancing: Benefits and Challenges.一项在社交距离期间进行在线有声思维定性方法的试点研究:益处与挑战。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 5;10(9):1700. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091700.
5
'Using humanity to change systems' - understanding the work of online feedback moderation: A case study of Care Opinion Scotland.“利用人性改变系统”——理解在线反馈审核工作:苏格兰护理意见案例研究
Digit Health. 2022 Feb 23;8:20552076211074489. doi: 10.1177/20552076211074489. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Turning the gaze: Digital patient feedback and the silent pathology of the NHS.将目光转向:数字患者反馈与国民保健制度的无声病理。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Feb;44(2):290-307. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13419. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
7
Health system responsiveness: a systematic evidence mapping review of the global literature.卫生系统响应性:全球文献系统证据制图综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 May 1;20(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01447-w.
8
Implementing online patient feedback in a 'special measures' acute hospital: A case study using Normalisation Process Theory.在一家“特别措施”急症医院实施在线患者反馈:一项运用常态化过程理论的案例研究
Digit Health. 2021 Apr 1;7:20552076211005962. doi: 10.1177/20552076211005962. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
9
Exploring UK doctors' attitudes towards online patient feedback: Thematic analysis of survey data.探索英国医生对在线患者反馈的态度:调查数据的主题分析
Digit Health. 2020 Mar 5;6:2055207620908148. doi: 10.1177/2055207620908148. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Political views of doctors in the UK: a cross-sectional study.英国医生的政治观点:一项横断面研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Oct;72(10):880-887. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210801. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
2
A cross sectional survey of the UK public to understand use of online ratings and reviews of health services.横断面调查英国公众对在线健康服务评分和评论的使用情况。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Sep;101(9):1690-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
3
GPs' knowledge, use, and confidence in national physical activity and health guidelines and tools: a questionnaire-based survey of general practice in England.全科医生对国家体力活动和健康指南及工具的了解、使用和信心:对英格兰普通实践的基于问卷调查的研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Oct;67(663):e668-e675. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692513. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
4
What does patient feedback reveal about the NHS? A mixed methods study of comments posted to the NHS Choices online service.患者反馈揭示了英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的哪些情况?一项对发布在NHS Choices在线服务上的评论进行的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 27;7(4):e013821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013821.
5
Investigating the meaning of 'good' or 'very good' patient evaluations of care in English general practice: a mixed methods study.探究英国全科医疗中患者对医疗服务“良好”或“非常好”评价的意义:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 2;7(3):e014718. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014718.
6
Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.医疗服务提供者是否利用在线患者评分来提高医疗质量?一项基于网络的横断面研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 19;18(9):e254. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5889.
7
Doctors' engagements with patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care: a qualitative study.医生在初级和二级医疗保健中参与患者体验调查:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):385-394. doi: 10.1111/hex.12465. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
8
General Practitioners' Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England.全科医生对在线患者反馈的担忧:英国一项描述性探索性定性研究的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 8;17(12):e276. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4989.
9
Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications.医生评级网站:伦理影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Jan;41(1):104-10.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.05.034. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
10
What do patients say about emergency departments in online reviews? A qualitative study.患者在在线评论中如何评价急诊科?一项定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jan;25(1):14-24. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004035. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

在线患者反馈:英国医疗保健专业人员的态度和经验的横断面调查。

Online patient feedback: a cross-sectional survey of the attitudes and experiences of United Kingdom health care professionals.

机构信息

Associate Professor, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK.

Research Fellow, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019 Oct;24(4):235-244. doi: 10.1177/1355819619844540. Epub 2019 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1177/1355819619844540
PMID:31154858
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7307411/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Online patient feedback is a growing phenomenon but little is known about health professional attitudes and behaviours in relation to it. We aimed to identify the characteristics, attitudes and self-reported behaviours and experiences of doctors and nurses towards online feedback from their patients or their carers.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional self-completed online questionnaire of 1001 registered doctors and 749 nurses and midwives involved in direct patient care in the United Kingdom.

RESULTS

Just over a quarter (27.7% or 277/1001) of doctors and 21% (157/749) of nurses were aware that patients/carers had provided online feedback about an episode of care in which they were involved, and 20.5% (205/1001) of doctors and 11.1% (83/749) of nurses had experienced online feedback about them as an individual practitioner. Feedback on reviews/ratings sites was seen as more useful than social media feedback to help improve services. Both types of feedback were more likely to be seen as useful by nurses compared with doctors and by hospital-based professionals compared with those based in community settings. Doctors were more likely than nurses to believe that online feedback is unrepresentative and generally negative in tone. The majority of respondents had never encouraged patients/carers to leave online feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite enthusiasm from health policymakers, many health care professionals have little direct experience of online feedback, and rarely encourage it, as they view it as unrepresentative and with limited value for improving the quality of health services. The difference in opinion between doctors and nurses has the potential to disrupt any use of online patient feedback. The findings have implications for policy and practice in how online patient feedback is solicited and acted upon.

摘要

目的

在线患者反馈是一种日益增长的现象,但对于医疗专业人员对此的态度和行为知之甚少。我们旨在确定医生和护士对患者或其照顾者在线反馈的特征、态度以及自我报告的行为和经验。

方法

我们对英国参与直接患者护理的 1001 名注册医生和 749 名护士和助产士进行了横断面自我完成的在线问卷调查。

结果

略多于四分之一(27.7%或 277/1001)的医生和 21%(157/749)的护士知道患者/照顾者提供了关于他们参与的护理事件的在线反馈,20.5%(205/1001)的医生和 11.1%(83/749)的护士收到了关于他们个人执业的在线反馈。与社交媒体反馈相比,他们认为对评论/评分网站的反馈更有助于改善服务。与医生相比,护士更有可能认为这两种类型的反馈都更有用,与社区环境中的专业人员相比,医院环境中的专业人员更有可能认为反馈有用。医生比护士更有可能认为在线反馈不具代表性,且总体基调负面。大多数受访者从未鼓励过患者/照顾者留下在线反馈。

结论

尽管卫生政策制定者对此充满热情,但许多医疗保健专业人员对在线反馈的直接经验很少,并且很少鼓励这种反馈,因为他们认为反馈不具代表性,对提高卫生服务质量的价值有限。医生和护士之间的意见分歧有可能破坏任何对在线患者反馈的使用。这些发现对政策和实践具有影响,即如何征求和处理在线患者反馈。