School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research.
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jan;149(1):94-103. doi: 10.1037/xge0000619. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
A person's ability to discriminate fine differences in tone frequency is vital for everyday hearing such as listening to speech and music. This ability can be improved through training (i.e., tone frequency learning). Depending on stimulus configurations and training procedures, tone frequency learning can either transfer to new frequencies, which would suggest learning of a general task structure, or show significant frequency specificity, which would suggest either changes in neural representations of trained frequencies, or reweighting of frequency-specific neural responses. Here we tested the hypothesis that frequency specificity in tone frequency learning can be abolished with a double-training procedure. Specifically, participants practiced tone frequency discrimination at 1 or 6 kHz, presumably encoded by different temporal or place coding mechanisms, respectively. The stimuli were brief tone pips known to produce significant specificity. Tone frequency learning was indeed initially highly frequency specific (Experiment 1). However, with additional exposure to the other untrained frequency via an irrelevant temporal interval discrimination task, or even background play during a visual task, learning transferred completely (1-to-6 kHz or 6-to-1 kHz; Experiments 2-4). These results support general task structure learning, or concept learning in our term, in tone frequency learning despite initial frequency specificity. They also suggest strategies to design efficient auditory training in practical settings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
一个人辨别音调频率细微差别的能力对日常听力(如听言语和音乐)至关重要。这种能力可以通过训练(即音调频率学习)来提高。取决于刺激配置和训练程序,音调频率学习既可以转移到新的频率,这表明学习了一般的任务结构,也可以表现出显著的频率特异性,这表明受训频率的神经表示发生了变化,或者对频率特异性神经反应进行了重新加权。在这里,我们通过双训练程序来检验音调频率学习中的频率特异性是否可以消除的假设。具体来说,参与者分别在 1 kHz 或 6 kHz 处进行音调频率辨别训练,这两种频率可能分别由不同的时间编码或位置编码机制编码。这些刺激是短暂的音调脉冲,已知它们会产生显著的特异性。音调频率学习确实最初具有高度的频率特异性(实验 1)。然而,通过在无关的时间间隔辨别任务中或在视觉任务期间进行背景播放,对另一个未训练频率的额外接触使学习完全转移(从 1 kHz 到 6 kHz 或从 6 kHz 到 1 kHz;实验 2-4)。这些结果支持音调频率学习中的一般任务结构学习,或者用我们的术语来说,概念学习,尽管最初具有频率特异性。它们还表明了在实际环境中设计有效听觉训练的策略。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。