Suppr超能文献

自动化纤维束重建用于手术规划:在语言相关白质束中的广泛验证。

Automated fiber tract reconstruction for surgery planning: Extensive validation in language-related white matter tracts.

机构信息

Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Neuroimage Clin. 2019;23:101883. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101883. Epub 2019 May 28.

Abstract

Diffusion MRI and tractography hold great potential for surgery planning, especially to preserve eloquent white matter during resections. However, fiber tract reconstruction requires an expert with detailed understanding of neuroanatomy. Several automated approaches have been proposed, using different strategies to reconstruct the white matter tracts in a supervised fashion. However, validation is often limited to comparison with manual delineation by overlap-based measures, which is limited in characterizing morphological and topological differences. In this work, we set up a fully automated pipeline based on anatomical criteria that does not require manual intervention, taking advantage of atlas-based criteria and advanced acquisition protocols available on clinical-grade MRI scanners. Then, we extensively validated it on epilepsy patients with specific focus on language-related bundles. The validation procedure encompasses different approaches, including simple overlap with manual segmentations from two experts, feasibility ratings from external multiple clinical raters and relation with task-based functional MRI. Overall, our results demonstrate good quantitative agreement between automated and manual segmentation, in most cases better performances of the proposed method in qualitative terms, and meaningful relationships with task-based fMRI. In addition, we observed significant differences between experts in terms of both manual segmentation and external ratings. These results offer important insights on how different levels of validation complement each other, supporting the idea that overlap-based measures, although quantitative, do not offer a full perspective on the similarities and differences between automated and manual methods.

摘要

弥散磁共振成像和束路追踪技术在手术规划中具有巨大的潜力,尤其是在切除过程中保留语言功能区的白质。然而,纤维束重建需要对神经解剖学有深入了解的专家。已经提出了几种自动化方法,这些方法使用不同的策略以监督的方式重建白质束。然而,验证通常仅限于与手动分割的重叠测量进行比较,而重叠测量在描述形态和拓扑差异方面存在局限性。在这项工作中,我们基于解剖学标准建立了一个完全自动化的管道,该管道不需要手动干预,利用基于图谱的标准和临床级磁共振扫描仪上可用的先进采集协议。然后,我们特别关注与语言相关的束,在癫痫患者中对其进行了广泛的验证。验证过程包括不同的方法,包括与两位专家的手动分割的简单重叠、来自外部多个临床评估者的可行性评分以及与任务相关的功能磁共振成像的关系。总体而言,我们的结果表明,自动化和手动分割之间具有良好的定量一致性,在大多数情况下,拟议方法在定性方面的性能更好,并且与任务相关的 fMRI 具有有意义的关系。此外,我们观察到在手动分割和外部评分方面专家之间存在显著差异。这些结果提供了有关不同验证水平如何相互补充的重要见解,支持了这样一种观点,即尽管基于重叠的测量是定量的,但它们并不能提供自动化和手动方法之间相似性和差异的全貌。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5ce/6545442/d3af28dc9b7c/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验