Kong Xiang-Zhen, Boedhoe Premika S W, Abe Yoshinari, Alonso Pino, Ameis Stephanie H, Arnold Paul D, Assogna Francesca, Baker Justin T, Batistuzzo Marcelo C, Benedetti Francesco, Beucke Jan C, Bollettini Irene, Bose Anushree, Brem Silvia, Brennan Brian P, Buitelaar Jan, Calvo Rosa, Cheng Yuqi, Cho Kang Ik K, Dallaspezia Sara, Denys Damiaan, Ely Benjamin A, Feusner Jamie, Fitzgerald Kate D, Fouche Jean-Paul, Fridgeirsson Egill A, Glahn David C, Gruner Patricia, Gürsel Deniz A, Hauser Tobias U, Hirano Yoshiyuki, Hoexter Marcelo Q, Hu Hao, Huyser Chaim, James Anthony, Jaspers-Fayer Fern, Kathmann Norbert, Kaufmann Christian, Koch Kathrin, Kuno Masaru, Kvale Gerd, Kwon Jun Soo, Lazaro Luisa, Liu Yanni, Lochner Christine, Marques Paulo, Marsh Rachel, Martínez-Zalacaín Ignacio, Mataix-Cols David, Medland Sarah E, Menchón José M, Minuzzi Luciano, Moreira Pedro S, Morer Astrid, Morgado Pedro, Nakagawa Akiko, Nakamae Takashi, Nakao Tomohiro, Narayanaswamy Janardhanan C, Nurmi Erika L, O'Neill Joseph, Pariente Jose C, Perriello Chris, Piacentini John, Piras Fabrizio, Piras Federica, Pittenger Christopher, Reddy Y C Janardhan, Rus-Oswald Oana Georgiana, Sakai Yuki, Sato Joao R, Schmaal Lianne, Simpson H Blair, Soreni Noam, Soriano-Mas Carles, Spalletta Gianfranco, Stern Emily R, Stevens Michael C, Stewart S Evelyn, Szeszko Philip R, Tolin David F, Tsuchiyagaito Aki, van Rooij Daan, van Wingen Guido A, Venkatasubramanian Ganesan, Wang Zhen, Yun Je-Yeon, Thompson Paul M, Stein Dan J, van den Heuvel Odile A, Francks Clyde
Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 15;87(12):1022-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
Lateralized dysfunction has been suggested in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, it is currently unclear whether OCD is characterized by abnormal patterns of brain structural asymmetry. Here we carried out what is by far the largest study of brain structural asymmetry in OCD.
We studied a collection of 16 pediatric datasets (501 patients with OCD and 439 healthy control subjects), as well as 30 adult datasets (1777 patients and 1654 control subjects) from the OCD Working Group within the ENIGMA (Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta Analysis) Consortium. Asymmetries of the volumes of subcortical structures, and of measures of regional cortical thickness and surface areas, were assessed based on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans, using harmonized image analysis and quality control protocols. We investigated possible alterations of brain asymmetry in patients with OCD. We also explored potential associations of asymmetry with specific aspects of the disorder and medication status.
In the pediatric datasets, the largest case-control differences were observed for volume asymmetry of the thalamus (more leftward; Cohen's d = 0.19) and the pallidum (less leftward; d = -0.21). Additional analyses suggested putative links between these asymmetry patterns and medication status, OCD severity, or anxiety and depression comorbidities. No significant case-control differences were found in the adult datasets.
The results suggest subtle changes of the average asymmetry of subcortical structures in pediatric OCD, which are not detectable in adults with the disorder. These findings may reflect altered neurodevelopmental processes in OCD.
强迫症(OCD)中已提出存在功能偏侧化障碍。然而,目前尚不清楚强迫症是否具有脑结构不对称的异常模式。在此,我们开展了迄今为止关于强迫症脑结构不对称的最大规模研究。
我们研究了16个儿科数据集(501例强迫症患者和439名健康对照者)以及来自ENIGMA(通过荟萃分析增强神经影像遗传学)联盟强迫症工作组的30个成人数据集(1777例患者和1654名对照者)。基于T1加权磁共振成像扫描,使用统一的图像分析和质量控制方案,评估了皮质下结构体积的不对称性以及区域皮质厚度和表面积的测量值。我们调查了强迫症患者脑不对称性的可能改变。我们还探讨了不对称性与该疾病的特定方面及用药状况之间的潜在关联。
在儿科数据集中,丘脑体积不对称性(更偏向左侧;Cohen's d = 0.19)和苍白球体积不对称性(较不偏向左侧;d = -0.21)的病例对照差异最大。进一步分析表明这些不对称模式与用药状况、强迫症严重程度或焦虑和抑郁共病之间存在假定联系。在成人数据集中未发现显著的病例对照差异。
结果表明儿科强迫症患者皮质下结构平均不对称性存在细微变化,而在成年患者中无法检测到这些变化。这些发现可能反映了强迫症中神经发育过程的改变。