• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 SEGUE 框架的在线儿科医生-家长沟通工具的开发和验证。

Development and Validation of Online Textual Pediatrician-Parent Communication Instrument Based on the SEGUE Framework.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2019 Apr 28;2019:8638174. doi: 10.1155/2019/8638174. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1155/2019/8638174
PMID:31183376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6512034/
Abstract

The prevalence and feature of online textual pediatrician-parent communication (OPPC) have been recognized, but evidence on OPPC assessment remains insufficient. This study aimed to develop and validate an OPPC instrument to provide measurement and quality characteristics for quality assessment and management. 490 OPPC exchanges of 61 tertiary hospitals from 9 Chinese provinces were obtained from the Spring Rain Doctor website. The SEGUE framework, OPPC feature, and a pilot study were considered to establish the instrument. An empirical study was conducted to validate it and the incidence of OPPC items was also analyzed. As a result, a four-dimensional, 15-item OPPC instrument was developed. The empirical results are as follows. Cronbach's values of dimensions were 0.80, 0.62, 0.64, and 0.60; the mean interrater reliability was 0.93; the correlation coefficients between items and their corresponding dimensions' scores ranged from 0.51 to 0.89 (P<0.001). The goodness-of-fit indices were acceptable. The overall incidence rate of parent-dominated/cooperative items (46.9%) was higher than that of pediatrician-dominated items (39.6%). Thus, the instrument is acceptable and OPPC quality is characterized by more parent-dominated and cooperative behaviors.

摘要

在线儿科医患文本交流(OPPC)的流行和特征已经得到了认识,但 OPPC 评估的证据仍然不足。本研究旨在开发和验证一种 OPPC 工具,为质量评估和管理提供测量和质量特征。从春雨医生网站获取了来自中国 9 个省的 61 家三级医院的 490 个 OPPC 交流。SEGUE 框架、OPPC 特征和试点研究被用来建立该工具。随后进行了一项验证其有效性的实证研究,并分析了 OPPC 项目的发生率。结果开发了一个四维度、15 个项目的 OPPC 工具。实证结果如下:维度的克朗巴赫 α 值分别为 0.80、0.62、0.64 和 0.60;平均评分者间信度为 0.93;项目与相应维度得分之间的相关系数范围为 0.51 至 0.89(P<0.001)。拟合优度指数是可接受的。以家长为主导/合作的项目(46.9%)的总发生率高于以儿科医生为主导的项目(39.6%)。因此,该工具是可接受的,OPPC 质量的特点是更多以家长为主导和合作的行为。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of Online Textual Pediatrician-Parent Communication Instrument Based on the SEGUE Framework.基于 SEGUE 框架的在线儿科医生-家长沟通工具的开发和验证。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Apr 28;2019:8638174. doi: 10.1155/2019/8638174. eCollection 2019.
2
Validation of the 5-item doctor-patient communication competency instrument for medical students (DPCC-MS) using two years of assessment data.使用两年的评估数据验证医学生医患沟通能力五分量表(DPCC-MS)。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Oct 26;17(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1026-9.
3
Measuring empathy in pediatrics: validation of the Visual CARE measure.儿科共情测量:视觉关怀量表的验证
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1050-x.
4
Readiness to change for interprofessional collaboration in healthcare: Development and validation of a theory-based instrument.医疗保健领域跨专业协作的变革意愿:一种基于理论的工具的开发与验证
J Interprof Care. 2018 Sep;32(5):539-548. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1448371. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
5
Trends of online patient-provider communication among cancer survivors from 2008 to 2017: a digital divide perspective.2008 年至 2017 年癌症幸存者的在线医患沟通趋势:数字鸿沟视角。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Apr;13(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00742-4. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
6
Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physician-pharmacist collaboration from the physician perspective.从医生角度出发的用于衡量医生与药剂师协作情况的工具的开发及初步验证。
Value Health. 2005 Jan-Feb;8(1):59-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.03093.x.
7
Neonatal intensive care parent satisfaction: a multicenter study translating and validating the Italian EMPATHIC-N questionnaire.新生儿重症监护家长满意度:多中心研究翻译和验证意大利 EMPATHIC-N 问卷。
Ital J Pediatr. 2018 Jan 5;44(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13052-017-0439-8.
8
Validation of the Family Meeting Behavioral Skills Checklist. An Instrument to Assess Fellows' Communication Skills.家庭会议行为技能清单的验证。一种评估学员沟通技能的工具。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1388-93. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201601-021OC.
9
Patient Expectation in China: Exploring Patient Satisfaction in Online and Offline Patient-Provider Communication.中国患者的期望:探索线上和线下医患沟通中的患者满意度
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 10;13:888657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888657. eCollection 2022.
10
Development of an instrument to measure medical students' perceptions of the assessment environment: initial validation.一种用于测量医学生对评估环境认知的工具的开发:初步验证
Med Educ Online. 2015 Oct 27;20:28612. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28612. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Collaborative Communication: A Qualitative Study of Roles and Emphases of Health Care Providers in Obstetrics and Gynecology.协作沟通:一项关于妇产科医疗服务提供者角色与重点的定性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Apr 29;17:1913-1922. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S457056. eCollection 2024.
2
The Chinese version of the Health Professional Communication Skills Scale: Psychometric evaluation.《健康专业人员沟通技能量表》中文版:心理测量学评估
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 9;14:1125404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125404. eCollection 2023.
3
Assessing measurement invariance of the SEGUE framework among Chinese and Ghanaian patients: A cross-sectional study.评估SEGUE框架在中国和加纳患者中的测量不变性:一项横断面研究。
PEC Innov. 2023 Jun 19;3:100183. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100183. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
4
Theoretical model and measurement of shared decision making in web-based pharmaceutical care consultation.基于网络的药学服务咨询中共同决策的理论模型与测量
Digit Health. 2022 Apr 4;8:20552076221089794. doi: 10.1177/20552076221089794. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
Development of the nurse's communication ability with angry patients scale and evaluation of its psychometric properties.护士与愤怒患者沟通能力量表的编制及心理测量学特性评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jun;77(6):2700-2708. doi: 10.1111/jan.14788. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Continued Use of Online Health Care Communities: Web Mining of Patient-Doctor Communication.患者持续使用在线医疗社区:医患沟通的网络挖掘
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 16;20(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9127.
2
Unhappy Patients Are Not Alike: Content Analysis of the Negative Comments from China's Good Doctor Website.不满意的患者各有不同:对中国好医生网站负面评论的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 25;20(1):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8223.
3
Techniques for Improving Communication of Emotional Content in Text-Only Web-Based Therapeutic Communications: Systematic Review.仅基于文本的网络治疗性沟通中改善情感内容传达的技术:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Oct 24;4(4):e46. doi: 10.2196/mental.6707.
4
Actual and Standardized Patient Evaluations of Medical Students' Skills.医学生技能的实际评估与标准化患者评估
Fam Med. 2017 Jul;49(7):548-552.
5
Finding the Words: Medical Students' Reflections on Communication Challenges in Clinic.寻找措辞:医学生对临床沟通挑战的反思
Fam Med. 2016 Nov;48(10):775-783.
6
Assessing Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Measures for Surveillance of Communication Outcomes.评估癌症护理中以患者为中心的沟通:沟通结果监测措施
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Dec;12(12):1198-1202. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.013334. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
7
Parent Satisfaction With Communication Is Associated With Physician's Patient-Centered Communication Patterns During Family Conferences.家长对沟通的满意度与医生在家庭会议期间以患者为中心的沟通模式相关。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jun;17(6):490-7. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000719.
8
Use and Uptake of eHealth in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey and Focus Group Study Among Health Care Users and General Practitioners.电子健康在全科医疗中的使用和接受情况:一项针对医疗保健使用者和全科医生的横断面调查和焦点小组研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Apr 6;4(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/medinform.4515.
9
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
10
Reliability and Construct Validity of Two Versions of Chalder Fatigue Scale among the General Population in Mainland China.中文版Chalder疲劳量表两个版本在中国大陆普通人群中的信度和结构效度
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jan 21;13(1):147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010147.