Paul Christine Louise, Cox Martine Elizabeth, Small Hannah Julie, Boyes Allison W, O'Brien Lorna, Rose Shiho Karina, Baker Amanda L, Henskens Frans A, Kirkwood Hannah Naomi, Roach Della M
Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, Australia.
JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Oct 24;4(4):e46. doi: 10.2196/mental.6707.
Web-based typed exchanges are increasingly used by professionals to provide emotional support to patients. Although some empirical evidence exists to suggest that various strategies may be used to convey emotion during Web-based text communication, there has been no critical review of these data in patients with chronic conditions.
The objective of this review was to identify the techniques used to convey emotion in written or typed Web-based communication and assess the empirical evidence regarding impact on communication and psychological outcomes.
An electronic search of databases, including MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify literature published from 1990 to 2016. Searches were also conducted using Google Scholar, manual searching of reference lists of identified papers and manual searching of tables of contents for selected relevant journals. Data extraction and coding were completed by 2 reviewers (10.00% [573/5731] of screened papers, at abstract/title screening stage; 10.0% of screened [69/694] papers, at full-text screening stage). Publications were assessed against the eligibility criteria and excluded if they were duplicates, were not published in English, were published before 1990, referenced animal or nonhuman subjects, did not describe original research, were not journal papers, or did not empirically test the effect of one or more nonverbal communication techniques (for eg, smileys, emoticons, emotional bracketing, voice accentuation, trailers [ellipsis], and pseudowords) as part of Web-based or typed communication on communication-related variables, including message interpretation, social presence, the nature of the interaction (eg, therapeutic alliance), patient perceptions of the interaction (eg, participant satisfaction), or psychological outcomes, including depression, anxiety, and distress.
A total of 6902 unique publications were identified. Of these, six publications met the eligibility criteria and were included in a narrative synthesis. All six studies addressed the effect of smileys or emoticons on participant responses, message interpretation, or social presence of the writer. None of these studies specifically targeted chronic conditions. It was found that emoticons were more effective in influencing the emotional impact of a message than no cue and that smileys and emoticons were able to convey a limited amount of emotion. No studies addressed other techniques for conveying emotion in written communication. No studies addressed the effects of any techniques on the nature of the interaction (eg, therapeutic alliance), patient perceptions of the interaction (eg, participant satisfaction), or psychological outcomes (depression, anxiety, or distress).
There is a need for greater empirical attention to the effects of the various proposed techniques for conveying emotion in Web-based typed communications to inform health service providers regarding best-practice communication skills in this setting.
专业人员越来越多地通过基于网络的文字交流为患者提供情感支持。尽管有一些实证证据表明,在基于网络的文本交流中可能会使用各种策略来传达情感,但尚未对慢性病患者的这些数据进行批判性综述。
本综述的目的是确定在基于网络的书面或文字交流中用于传达情感的技巧,并评估有关其对交流和心理结果影响的实证证据。
对包括MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆在内的数据库进行电子检索,以识别1990年至2016年发表的文献。还使用谷歌学术进行了检索,手动搜索已识别论文的参考文献列表,并手动搜索选定相关期刊的目录。数据提取和编码由两名审稿人完成(在摘要/标题筛选阶段,占筛选论文的10.00%[573/5731];在全文筛选阶段,占筛选论文的10.0%[69/694])。根据纳入标准对出版物进行评估,如果是重复的、非英文发表的、1990年以前发表的、涉及动物或非人类受试者的、未描述原创研究的、不是期刊论文的,或者未实证测试一种或多种非语言交流技巧(例如,笑脸符号、表情符号、情感括注、语音强调、尾注[省略号]和伪词)作为基于网络或文字交流的一部分对与交流相关变量(包括信息解释、社会临场感、互动性质(例如,治疗联盟)、患者对互动的感知(例如,参与者满意度))或心理结果(包括抑郁、焦虑和痛苦)的影响,则将其排除。
共识别出6902篇独特的出版物。其中,六篇出版物符合纳入标准,并被纳入叙述性综述。所有六项研究都探讨了笑脸符号或表情符号对参与者反应、信息解释或作者社会临场感的影响。这些研究均未专门针对慢性病患者。研究发现,表情符号在影响信息的情感影响方面比没有提示更有效,并且笑脸符号和表情符号能够传达有限的情感量。没有研究探讨书面交流中传达情感的其他技巧。没有研究探讨任何技巧对互动性质(例如,治疗联盟)、患者对互动的感知(例如,参与者满意度)或心理结果(抑郁、焦虑或痛苦)的影响。
需要更多实证研究关注各种提议的在基于网络的文字交流中传达情感的技巧的效果,以便为卫生服务提供者提供有关这种情况下最佳交流技巧的信息。