Shao Yong, Zhang Chenchen, Zhou Jing, Gu Ting, Yuan Yuan
College of Economics and Management, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China.
School of Art, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Front Psychol. 2019 May 28;10:1219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01219. eCollection 2019.
The purpose of this study was to examine how culture shapes creativity by reviewing empirical findings across diverse studies. The impact of culture on creativity is typically manifested in three ways: (1) people from different cultures or settings have distinct implicit and/or explicit conceptions of creativity; (2) individuals from different cultures, particularly those from individualist and collectivist cultures, show differences in preferred creative processes and creative processing modes (e.g., usefulness seems more important than novelty in the East, whereas novelty seems equally important as usefulness, if not more so, in the West) when they are engaged in creative endeavors; (3) creativity may be assessed using different measures based on culture-related contents or materials, and findings are accurate only when culturally appropriate or culturally fair measures are used. Potential implications and future directions are also proposed.
本研究的目的是通过回顾不同研究的实证结果来考察文化如何塑造创造力。文化对创造力的影响通常以三种方式体现:(1)来自不同文化或背景的人对创造力有不同的隐性和/或显性概念;(2)来自不同文化的个体,特别是来自个人主义和集体主义文化的个体,在从事创造性活动时,在偏好的创造性过程和创造性加工模式上存在差异(例如,在东方,有用性似乎比新颖性更重要,而在西方,新颖性如果不比有用性更重要,至少与有用性同等重要);(3)创造力可能会根据与文化相关的内容或材料使用不同的测量方法进行评估,并且只有当使用文化上合适或文化上公平的测量方法时,结果才是准确的。本文还提出了潜在的影响和未来的方向。