Silva Alyssa Conte da, Santos Gilmar Moraes, Marques Cláudia Mirian de Godoy, Marques Jefferson Luiz Brum
Centre of Health and Sports Sciences, University of the State of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
J Chiropr Med. 2019 Mar;18(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2018.10.001. Epub 2019 May 7.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of thoracic spinal manipulation (SM) on shoulder pain and ranges of motion in individuals with shoulder pain.
The sample was composed of 60 individuals, randomly allocated into the manipulation group (n = 30), who received the SM, and the placebo group (n = 30) who received a placebo manipulation. Pain evaluation was performed using the visual analog scale, and evaluation of shoulder flexion and abduction ranges of motion was assessed using a goniometer pre- and post-intervention. The intervention was performed by either upper thoracic SM or a placebo manipulation.
The manipulation group demonstrated increased flexion and abduction of the painful shoulder ( < .01) and increased abduction of the nonpainful shoulder ( = .03), but only the abduction of the painful shoulder reached the minimal detectable change. The placebo group showed a post-intervention increase in the flexion ( = .03) and abduction ( < .01) movement of the painful shoulder. Both groups presented a statistically significant reduction in post-intervention pain ( < .01), but not clinically significant.
Although the SM demonstrated a statistically significant difference for shoulder pain, this was not over the clinically meaningful change. Only the abduction of the painful shoulder reached the minimal detectable change.
本研究旨在调查胸椎整复手法(SM)对肩部疼痛患者肩部疼痛及活动范围的影响。
样本由60名个体组成,随机分为整复手法组(n = 30),接受SM治疗,以及安慰剂组(n = 30),接受安慰剂手法治疗。使用视觉模拟量表进行疼痛评估,并在干预前后使用角度计评估肩部前屈和外展活动范围。干预由上胸椎SM或安慰剂手法进行。
整复手法组疼痛肩部的前屈和外展增加(P <.01),非疼痛肩部的外展增加(P =.03),但只有疼痛肩部的外展达到最小可检测变化。安慰剂组疼痛肩部的干预后前屈(P =.03)和外展(P <.01)运动增加。两组干预后疼痛均有统计学显著降低(P <.01),但无临床意义。
尽管SM在肩部疼痛方面显示出统计学显著差异,但未超过临床有意义的变化。只有疼痛肩部的外展达到最小可检测变化。