Smiley Sabrina L, Kintz Natalie, Rodriguez Yaneth L, Barahona Rosa, Sussman Steve, Cruz Tess Boley, Chou Chih-Ping, Pentz Mary Ann, Samet Jonathan M, Baezconde-Garbanati Lourdes
Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science for Vulnerable Populations, Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Addict Behav Rep. 2018 Dec 5;9:100149. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2018.100149. eCollection 2019 Jun.
Evidence of a concentration of cigarette advertising in predominantly low-income, non-White neighborhoods underscores the need to examine retail marketing and promotions for novel tobacco products like little cigars and cigarillos (LCCs). We sought to investigate neighborhood racial/ethnic disparities in LCC marketing at retail, including availability, advertising, price promotions, and product placement in Los Angeles, California.
Between January 2016 and April 2017, community health workers (n = 19) conducted in-person observational audits from tobacco retail stores (n = 679) located in zip codes with a high percentage of non-Hispanic White (n = 196), Black (n = 194), Hispanic/Latino (n = 189), or Korean American (n = 100) residents. To account for clustering effect of zip codes, multilevel modeling approach for a dichotomized outcome was conducted to evaluate the association between racial/ethnic neighborhood sample and dependent variables.
Stores located in zip codes with a high percentage of non-Hispanic Blacks had more than eight times higher odds of selling LCCs (OR = 8.10; 95% CI = 3.10-21.11 vs. non-Hispanic White), more than five times higher odds of selling flavored LCCs (OR = 5.20; 95% CI = 2.33-11.61 vs. non-Hispanic White), and more than six times higher odds of displaying storefront exterior LCC signage (OR = 6.03; 95% CI = 2.93-12.40 vs. non-Hispanic White). Stores in Hispanic/Latino and Korean American communities had about three times higher odds of selling LCCs (OR = 3.02; 95% CI = 1.15-7.93 vs. non-Hispanic White; OR = 2.99; 95% CI = 1.33-6.71 vs. non-Hispanic White).
LCCs are heavily marketed in retail establishments in Los Angeles, with disproportionate targeting of predominantly non-White neighborhoods, especially stores in neighborhoods with a higher proportion of African Americans. Local, state, and federal flavor restrictions, minimum pack size standards, preventive messages, and campaigns could counter the influence of LCC marketing in retail establishments.
有证据表明香烟广告集中在主要为低收入、非白人的社区,这凸显了审视针对小雪茄和小烟这类新型烟草产品的零售营销及促销活动的必要性。我们试图调查加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市零售场所中针对小雪茄和小烟营销的社区种族差异,包括可获得性、广告、价格促销以及产品摆放情况。
在2016年1月至2017年4月期间,社区卫生工作者(共19名)对位于邮政编码区域内的烟草零售店(共679家)进行了实地观察审计,这些邮政编码区域内非西班牙裔白人居民(196家)、黑人居民(194家)、西班牙裔/拉丁裔居民(189家)或韩裔美国居民(100家)占比很高。为了考虑邮政编码区域的聚类效应,采用了二分结果的多水平建模方法来评估种族/族裔社区样本与因变量之间的关联。
位于非西班牙裔黑人占比高的邮政编码区域内的商店销售小雪茄和小烟的几率比非西班牙裔白人占比高的区域高出八倍多(比值比[OR]=8.10;95%置信区间[CI]=3.10 - 21.11,与非西班牙裔白人区域相比),销售调味小雪茄和小烟的几率高出五倍多(OR=5.20;95% CI=2.33 - 11.61,与非西班牙裔白人区域相比),展示店面外部小雪茄和小烟标识的几率高出六倍多(OR=6.03;95% CI=2.93 - 12.40,与非西班牙裔白人区域相比)。西班牙裔/拉丁裔和韩裔美国社区的商店销售小雪茄和小烟的几率比非西班牙裔白人社区高出约三倍(OR=3.02;95% CI=1.15 - 7.93,与非西班牙裔白人社区相比;OR=2.99;95% CI=1.33 - 6.71,与非西班牙裔白人社区相比)。
在洛杉矶的零售场所中,小雪茄和小烟的营销力度很大,且主要针对非白人社区,尤其是非裔美国人比例较高的社区。地方、州和联邦层面的口味限制、最小包装尺寸标准、预防性信息及宣传活动可以对抗零售场所中小雪茄和小烟营销的影响。