Suppr超能文献

非甾体抗炎药、抗血小板药和/或抗凝药相关的上消化道出血:10年后预防率有变化吗?

NSAID, antiaggregant, and/or anticoagulant-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Is there any change in prophylaxis rate after a 10-year period?

作者信息

Dinçer Dinç, Ulukal Karancı Ece, Akın Mete, Adanır Haydar

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.

Department of Internal Medicine, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun;30(6):505-510. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2019.19057.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Using proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) is a protective option for patients who require long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antiaggregants. In our previous study, the rate of PPI use in prophylaxis was found to be 2%. Here we aimed to investigate whether there is a change in PPI use in prophylaxis in a similar patient group after 10 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients who followed up with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding diagnosis between January 01, 2016 and December 31, 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients who had malignancy or variceal hemorrhage were excluded. Ninety-six patients, who had taken NSAIDs, antiaggregants, or anticoagulants that were considered as the possible cause of bleeding, were included in the study. Risk groups for NSAID GI toxicity and PPI use rates in these patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty (21%) of all patients with upper GI bleeding were using PPI. According to the pre-bleeding risk factor assessment, 86% of the patients were found to have moderate to high risk for NSAID-related GI bleeding, and 81% of these patients were not using PPI. PPI prophylaxis was not provided to 15 (75%) of the 20 patients with previous history of peptic ulcer bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Despite many studies and recommendations on risk factors and prophylaxis for NSAID-related bleeding, prophylactic PPI use is still largely ignored by physicians. The rate of PPI use in the patient group of this study was found still quite insufficient.

摘要

背景/目的:对于需要长期使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和抗血小板药物的患者,使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是一种保护措施。在我们之前的研究中,发现预防性使用PPI的比例为2%。在此,我们旨在调查在10年后,类似患者群体中预防性使用PPI的情况是否有变化。

材料与方法

对2016年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间因上消化道(GI)出血诊断而接受随访的患者进行回顾性评估。排除患有恶性肿瘤或静脉曲张出血的患者。纳入96名服用过被认为可能是出血原因的NSAIDs、抗血小板药物或抗凝剂的患者。评估这些患者中NSAID胃肠道毒性的风险组和PPI使用率。

结果

所有上消化道出血患者中有20名(21%)正在使用PPI。根据出血前危险因素评估,发现86%的患者存在NSAID相关胃肠道出血的中到高风险,其中81%的患者未使用PPI。20名有消化性溃疡出血既往史的患者中,有15名(75%)未接受PPI预防。

结论

尽管有许多关于NSAID相关出血的危险因素和预防措施的研究及建议,但预防性使用PPI在很大程度上仍被医生忽视。本研究患者群体中PPI的使用率仍然相当不足。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Acute, nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Apr;21(2):154-62. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000185.
6
Guidelines for prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications.非甾体抗炎药相关性溃疡并发症的预防指南。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):728-38. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.115. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验