Suppr超能文献

在创新的数字支持24小时服务背景下患者报告结局指标与慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重程度的关系:纵向研究

Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and the Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Context of an Innovative Digitally Supported 24-Hour Service: Longitudinal Study.

作者信息

Lindskrog Signe, Christensen Karl Bang, Osborne Richard H, Vingtoft Søren, Phanareth Klaus, Kayser Lars

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 2;21(6):e10924. doi: 10.2196/10924.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) live with the burden of a progressive life-threatening condition that is often accompanied by anxiety and depression. The severity of the condition is usually considered from a clinical perspective and characterized according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification of severity (1-4) and a risk assessment (A through D) that focuses on the patient's symptoms and number of exacerbations, but information about perceived health or ability to manage the condition are rarely included.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated 3 patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) to examine how these can be used to report on individuals with COPD who were supported by a digitally assisted intervention that aims to increase the patient's management of their condition to improve their well-being.

METHODS

A total of 93 individuals with COPD were enrolled. At baseline and after 6 and 12 months, we measured self-reported self-management (Health Education Impact Questionnaire, heiQ) and health literacy (Health Literacy Questionnaire, HLQ), and physical and mental health (Short Form-36, SF-36) PROMs were collected. The scores of the 19 PROM dimensions were related to COPD severity, that is, GOLD risk assessment, pulmonary function at entry, and number of exacerbations of a period up to 12 months. The initial PROM scores were also compared with pulmonary function, exacerbations, and GOLD risk assessment to predict the number of contacts within the first 90 days.

RESULTS

At baseline, 2 dimensions from heiQ and SF-36 Physical health differed significantly between GOLD risk factor groups, indicating more distress and poorer attitudes and health status with increasing severity (GOLD risk assessment). Pulmonary function (FEV1) was negatively associated with the severity of the condition. After 6 months, we observed an increase in heiQ6 (skill and technique acquisition) and a reduction in emotional distress. The latter effect persisted after 12 months, where heiQ4 (self-monitoring and insight) also increased. HLQ3 (actively managing my health) decreased after 6 and 12 months. The number of exacerbations and the GOLD risk factor assessment predicted the number of contacts during the first 90 days. Furthermore, 2 of the PROMS heiQ6 (skill and technique acquisition) and HLQ8 (ability to find good health information) evaluated at baseline were associated with the number of contacts within the first 90 after enrollment. The pulmonary function was not associated with the number of contacts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that selected dimensions from HLQ, heiQ, and SF-36 can be used as PROMs in relation to COPD to provide researchers and clinicians with greater insight into how this condition affects individuals' ability to understand and manage their condition and perception of their physical and mental health. The PROMs add to the information obtained with the clinical characteristics including the GOLD risk factor assessment.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.6506.

摘要

背景

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者生活在一种进行性危及生命的疾病负担之下,且常伴有焦虑和抑郁。该疾病的严重程度通常从临床角度考虑,并根据慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)的严重程度分类(1 - 4级)以及侧重于患者症状和急性加重次数的风险评估(A至D)来进行特征描述,但关于感知健康或疾病管理能力的信息很少被纳入。

目的

我们评估了3种患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs),以研究如何利用这些指标报告接受数字辅助干预的COPD患者情况,该干预旨在增强患者对自身疾病的管理能力,从而改善其健康状况。

方法

共招募了93名COPD患者。在基线、6个月和12个月后,我们测量了自我报告的自我管理能力(健康教育影响问卷,heiQ)和健康素养(健康素养问卷,HLQ),并收集了身心健康(简短健康调查问卷,SF - 36)方面的PROMs。19个PROM维度的得分与COPD严重程度相关,即GOLD风险评估、入组时的肺功能以及长达12个月期间的急性加重次数。还将初始PROM得分与肺功能、急性加重情况和GOLD风险评估进行比较,以预测前90天内的联系次数。

结果

在基线时,GOLD风险因素组之间,heiQ和SF - 36身体健康方面的2个维度存在显著差异,表明随着严重程度增加(GOLD风险评估),痛苦更多,态度和健康状况更差。肺功能(FEV1)与疾病严重程度呈负相关。6个月后,我们观察到heiQ6(技能和技术获取)增加,情绪困扰减少。12个月后,后者的效果持续存在,此时heiQ4(自我监测和洞察力)也增加。HLQ3(积极管理我的健康)在6个月和12个月后下降。急性加重次数和GOLD风险因素评估预测了前90天内的联系次数。此外,基线时评估的2个PROMs,即heiQ6(技能和技术获取)和HLQ8(找到良好健康信息的能力)与入组后前90天内的联系次数相关。肺功能与联系次数无关。

结论

我们的数据表明,HLQ、heiQ和SF - 36中选定的维度可作为与COPD相关的PROMs,为研究人员和临床医生提供更深入的了解,即这种疾病如何影响个体理解和管理自身疾病的能力以及他们对身心健康的感知。这些PROMs补充了通过包括GOLD风险因素评估在内的临床特征所获得的信息。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):RR2 - 10.2196/resprot.6506

相似文献

4
The association between objectively measured physical activity and morning symptoms in COPD.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Oct 3;12:2831-2840. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S143387. eCollection 2017.
6
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Improves Self-Management Ability in Subjects With Obstructive Lung Disease.
Respir Care. 2021 Aug;66(8):1271-1281. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07852. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Quality of Life of Patients.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;884:69-74. doi: 10.1007/5584_2015_178.

本文引用的文献

3
Symptom burden and self-management in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Jan 24;13:365-373. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S151428. eCollection 2018.
4
Structural properties and psychometric improvements of the Health Literacy Questionnaire in a Slovak population.
Int J Public Health. 2017 Jun;62(5):591-604. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-0945-x. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
5
German translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172340. eCollection 2017.
10
Assessment of patient empowerment--a systematic review of measures.
PLoS One. 2015 May 13;10(5):e0126553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126553. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验