Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Department of Pathology, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 8528501, Japan.
Diagn Pathol. 2019 Jun 26;14(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13000-019-0839-8.
The establishment of whole-slide imaging (WSI) as a medical diagnostic device allows that pathologists may evaluate mitotic activity with this new technology. Furthermore, the image digitalization provides an opportunity to develop algorithms for automatic quantifications, ideally leading to improved reproducibility as compared to the naked eye examination by pathologists. In order to implement them effectively, accuracy of mitotic figure detection using WSI should be investigated. In this study, we aimed to measure pathologist performance in detecting mitotic figures (MFs) using multiple platforms (multiple scanners) and compare the results with those obtained using a brightfield microscope.
Four slides of canine oral melanoma were prepared and digitized using 4 WSI scanners. In these slides, 40 regions of interest (ROIs) were demarcated, and five observers identified the MFs using different viewing modes: microscopy and WSI. We evaluated the inter- and intra-observer agreements between modes with Cohen's Kappa and determined "true" MFs with a consensus panel. We then assessed the accuracy (agreement with truth) using the average of sensitivity and specificity.
In the 40 ROIs, 155 candidate MFs were detected by five pathologists; 74 of them were determined to be true MFs. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was mostly "substantial" or greater (Kappa = 0.594-0.939). Accuracy was between 0.632 and 0.843 across all readers and modes. After averaging over readers for each modality, we found that mitosis detection accuracy for 3 of the 4 WSI scanners was significantly less than that of the microscope (p = 0.002, 0.012, and 0.001).
This study is the first to compare WSIs and microscopy in detecting MFs at the level of individual cells. Our results suggest that WSI can be used for mitotic cell detection and offers similar reproducibility to the microscope, with slightly less accuracy.
全切片成像(WSI)作为一种医学诊断设备的建立使得病理学家可以使用这项新技术评估有丝分裂活性。此外,图像数字化为开发自动定量算法提供了机会,与病理学家用肉眼检查相比,这理想地导致了更好的重现性。为了有效地实施这些算法,应该研究使用 WSI 检测有丝分裂图(MFs)的准确性。在这项研究中,我们旨在测量病理学家使用多种平台(多个扫描仪)检测有丝分裂图(MFs)的性能,并将结果与使用明场显微镜获得的结果进行比较。
制备了四张犬口腔黑色素瘤切片,并使用 4 个 WSI 扫描仪对其进行数字化。在这些切片中,划定了 40 个感兴趣区域(ROI),5 位观察者使用不同的观察模式(显微镜和 WSI)来识别 MF。我们使用 Cohen's Kappa 评估模式之间的观察者间和观察者内一致性,并使用共识小组确定“真实”MF。然后,我们使用灵敏度和特异性的平均值评估准确性(与真实情况的一致性)。
在 40 个 ROI 中,5 位病理学家共检测到 155 个候选 MF;其中 74 个被确定为真正的 MF。观察者间和观察者内的一致性大多为“中等”或更高(Kappa=0.594-0.939)。所有读者和模式的准确性在 0.632 到 0.843 之间。对每个模式的读者进行平均后,我们发现 4 个 WSI 扫描仪中的 3 个的有丝分裂检测准确性明显低于显微镜(p=0.002、0.012 和 0.001)。
这项研究首次在单个细胞水平上比较了 WSI 和显微镜在检测 MF 方面的性能。我们的结果表明,WSI 可用于有丝分裂细胞检测,其重现性与显微镜相似,准确性略低。