Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Herlev Hospital , Herlev.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen.
Acta Orthop. 2019 Oct;90(5):489-494. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1633759. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
Background and purpose - Osteoarthritis has become the most common indication for shoulder arthroplasty in Denmark, and the treatment strategies have changed towards the use of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We investigated whether changes in the use of arthroplasty types have changed the overall patient-reported outcome from 2006 to 2015. Patients and methods - We included 2,867 shoulder arthroplasties performed for osteoarthritis between 2006 and 2015 and reported to the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry. The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index at 1 year was used as patient-reported outcome. The raw score was converted to a percentage of a maximum score. General linear models were used to analyze differences in WOOS. Results - The proportion of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty increased from 3% and 7% in 2006 to 53% and 27% in 2015. The mean WOOS score was 70 (SD 26) after resurfacing hemiarthroplasties (n = 1,258), 68 (SD 26) after stemmed hemiarthroplasty (n = 500), 82 (SD 23) after anatomical total shoulder arthroplasties (n = 815), and 74 (SD 23) after reverse shoulder arthroplasties (n = 213). During the study period, the overall WOOS score increased with 18 (95% CI 12-22) in the univariate model and 10 (CI 5-15) in the multivariable model, and the WOOS scores for anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty increased by 14 (CI 5-23). Interpretation - We found an increased WOOS score from 2006 to 2015, which was primarily related to a higher proportion of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty towards the end of the study period, and to improved outcome of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty.
背景与目的-骨关节炎已成为丹麦肩关节置换最常见的适应证,治疗策略已转向使用解剖型全肩关节置换和反式肩关节置换。我们研究了 2006 年至 2015 年间关节置换类型的使用变化是否改变了整体患者报告的结果。
患者和方法-我们纳入了 2006 年至 2015 年间因骨关节炎行 2867 例肩关节置换,并向丹麦肩关节置换登记处报告。1 年时采用 Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder(WOOS)指数作为患者报告的结果。原始分数转换为最大分数的百分比。使用一般线性模型分析 WOOS 的差异。
结果-解剖型全肩关节置换和反式肩关节置换的比例从 2006 年的 3%和 7%增加到 2015 年的 53%和 27%。表面髋关节成形术(n=1258)后 WOOS 评分平均为 70(SD 26),柄髋关节成形术(n=500)后 WOOS 评分为 68(SD 26),解剖型全肩关节置换(n=815)后 WOOS 评分为 82(SD 23),反式肩关节置换(n=213)后 WOOS 评分为 74(SD 23)。在研究期间,单变量模型中 WOOS 评分总体增加了 18(95%CI 12-22),多变量模型中增加了 10(CI 5-15),解剖型全肩关节置换的 WOOS 评分增加了 14(CI 5-23)。
解释-我们发现 2006 年至 2015 年间 WOOS 评分增加,这主要与研究末期解剖型全肩关节置换和反式肩关节置换的比例增加以及解剖型全肩关节置换结果改善有关。