Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33(7):1887-1896. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002804.
Giménez, JV and Gomez, MA. Relationships among circuit training, small-sided and mini goal games, and competition in professional soccer players: A comparison of on-field integrated training routines. J Strength Cond Res 33(7): 1887-1896, 2019-The aim of this study was to investigate and compare different physical variables and load indicators of 2 small-sided game (SSG) formats and ball circuit training (CT). Fourteen professional players participated in 3 training routines using a similar occupied area per player (90 m). The CT, SSGs, and mini goal games (MGs) consisted of 8 repetitions of 4-minute game play, interspersed by 2 minutes of active recovery, and data were compared with the first 32 minutes of 2 competitive match simulations (MS). All movement patterns from walking to sprinting were recorded using 10-Hz global positioning system devices, whereas player perception of exertion was recorded after trial using a visual analogue scale. Practical differences among the 3 drills and MS were analyzed using magnitude-based inferences. The results suggested that the training routines did not exactly replicate the movement patterns of a competitive match. Furthermore, this study provides evidence that if high-intensity play is preferred, then SSGs should be emphasized (because they provide more total accelerations compared with the other drills; most likely effects). Moreover, the CT showed lower load and distance covered (m) than the MGs and SSGs. In conclusion, these drills may be useful for competition and impact microcycles (i.e., intermittent efforts with accelerations, decelerations, and walking actions) to achieve the specific adaptations of high-intensity efforts.
希梅内斯,JV 和戈麦斯,MA。循环训练、小场比赛和迷你目标比赛与职业足球运动员竞争之间的关系:对场上综合训练常规的比较。J 力量与体能研究 33(7):1887-1896,2019-本研究的目的是调查和比较 2 种小场比赛(SSG)格式和球循环训练(CT)的不同物理变量和负荷指标。14 名职业球员参与了 3 种训练常规,每位球员的占用面积相似(90 米)。CT、SSG 和迷你目标比赛(MG)由 4 分钟的 8 次比赛组成,穿插 2 分钟的主动恢复,数据与 2 次竞争性模拟比赛(MS)的前 32 分钟进行比较。所有从步行到冲刺的运动模式都使用 10-Hz 全球定位系统设备记录,而球员在试用后使用视觉模拟量表记录感知的努力程度。使用基于幅度的推理分析了 3 种训练和 MS 之间的实际差异。结果表明,训练常规并未完全复制竞争性比赛的运动模式。此外,本研究提供的证据表明,如果更喜欢高强度比赛,则应强调 SSG(因为与其他训练相比,它们提供更多的总加速度;很可能的影响)。此外,CT 的负荷和距离(米)覆盖范围低于 MG 和 SSG。总之,这些训练可以用于比赛,并影响微周期(即,具有加速度、减速和步行动作的间歇性努力),以实现高强度努力的特定适应。