• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习的特征选择和转换减少了变量数量,并提高了心力衰竭再入院或死亡的预测准确性。

Feature selection and transformation by machine learning reduce variable numbers and improve prediction for heart failure readmission or death.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

Discipline of Information Technology, Mathematics & Statistics, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jun 26;14(6):e0218760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218760. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0218760
PMID:31242238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6594617/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prediction of readmission or death after a hospital discharge for heart failure (HF) remains a major challenge. Modern healthcare systems, electronic health records, and machine learning (ML) techniques allow us to mine data to select the most significant variables (allowing for reduction in the number of variables) without compromising the performance of models used for prediction of readmission and death. Moreover, ML methods based on transformation of variables may potentially further improve the performance.

OBJECTIVE

To use ML techniques to determine the most relevant and also transform variables for the prediction of 30-day readmission or death in HF patients.

METHODS

We identified all Western Australian patients aged 65 years and above admitted for HF between 2003-2008 in linked administrative data. We evaluated variables associated with HF readmission or death using standard statistical and ML based selection techniques. We also tested the new variables produced by transformation of the original variables. We developed multi-layer perceptron prediction models and compared their predictive performance using metrics such as Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Following hospital discharge, the proportion of 30-day readmissions or death was 23.7% in our cohort of 10,757 HF patients. The prediction model developed by us using a smaller set of variables (n = 8) had comparable performance (AUC 0.62) to the traditional model (n = 47, AUC 0.62). Transformation of the original 47 variables further improved (p<0.001) the performance of the predictive model (AUC 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

A small set of variables selected using ML matched the performance of the model that used the full set of 47 variables for predicting 30-day readmission or death in HF patients. Model performance can be further significantly improved by transforming the original variables using ML methods.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭(HF)患者出院后再入院或死亡的预测仍然是一个主要挑战。现代医疗保健系统、电子健康记录和机器学习(ML)技术使我们能够挖掘数据,选择最重要的变量(允许减少变量的数量),而不会影响用于预测再入院和死亡的模型的性能。此外,基于变量转换的 ML 方法可能会进一步提高性能。

目的

使用 ML 技术确定与 HF 患者 30 天再入院或死亡预测最相关的变量,并对其进行转换。

方法

我们在链接的行政数据中确定了 2003-2008 年期间因 HF 住院的所有 65 岁及以上的西澳大利亚患者。我们使用标准统计和基于 ML 的选择技术评估了与 HF 再入院或死亡相关的变量。我们还测试了原始变量转换后产生的新变量。我们开发了多层感知器预测模型,并使用 AUC、敏感性和特异性等指标比较了它们的预测性能。

结果

在我们的 10757 名 HF 患者队列中,出院后 30 天内再入院或死亡的比例为 23.7%。我们使用较小变量集(n=8)开发的预测模型的性能与传统模型(n=47,AUC 0.62)相当(AUC 0.62)。原始 47 个变量的转换进一步提高了预测模型的性能(p<0.001)(AUC 0.66)。

结论

使用 ML 选择的一小部分变量与使用 47 个完整变量的模型在预测 HF 患者 30 天内再入院或死亡的性能相当。通过使用 ML 方法转换原始变量,可以显著提高模型性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f6/6594617/b81f7edafd3f/pone.0218760.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f6/6594617/b81f7edafd3f/pone.0218760.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f6/6594617/b81f7edafd3f/pone.0218760.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Feature selection and transformation by machine learning reduce variable numbers and improve prediction for heart failure readmission or death.机器学习的特征选择和转换减少了变量数量,并提高了心力衰竭再入院或死亡的预测准确性。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 26;14(6):e0218760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218760. eCollection 2019.
2
Machine learning-based prediction of heart failure readmission or death: implications of choosing the right model and the right metrics.基于机器学习的心力衰竭再入院或死亡预测:选择正确模型和指标的意义。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;6(2):428-435. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12419. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
3
Risk prediction for 30-day heart failure-specific readmission or death after discharge: Data from the Korean Acute Heart Failure (KorAHF) registry.出院后 30 天内心力衰竭特定再入院或死亡的风险预测:来自韩国急性心力衰竭(KorAHF)注册研究的数据。
J Cardiol. 2019 Feb;73(2):108-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
PREDICTIVE MODELING OF HOSPITAL READMISSION RATES USING ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD-WIDE MACHINE LEARNING: A CASE-STUDY USING MOUNT SINAI HEART FAILURE COHORT.使用全电子病历机器学习对医院再入院率进行预测建模:以西奈山心力衰竭队列为例的研究
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2017;22:276-287. doi: 10.1142/9789813207813_0027.
5
Using machine learning to predict paediatric 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: a case-control retrospective analysis of medical records, including written discharge documentation.使用机器学习预测儿科 30 天内非计划性住院再入院率:病历回顾性病例对照研究,包括书面出院记录。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Jun;45(3):328-337. doi: 10.1071/AH20062.
6
SHAP based predictive modeling for 1 year all-cause readmission risk in elderly heart failure patients: feature selection and model interpretation.基于 SHAP 的预测模型对老年心力衰竭患者 1 年全因再入院风险的预测:特征选择和模型解释。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67844-7.
7
The Price of Explainability in Machine Learning Models for 100-Day Readmission Prediction in Heart Failure: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.机器学习模型在心力衰竭 100 天再入院预测中的可解释性代价:回顾性、比较性、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 27;25:e46934. doi: 10.2196/46934.
8
Predicting the risk of unplanned readmission or death within 30 days of discharge after a heart failure hospitalization.预测心力衰竭住院患者出院后 30 天内再次入院或死亡的风险。
Am Heart J. 2012 Sep;164(3):365-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
9
A machine learning model to predict the risk of 30-day readmissions in patients with heart failure: a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records data.机器学习模型预测心力衰竭患者 30 天再入院风险:电子病历数据的回顾性分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jun 22;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0620-z.
10
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Hospital Readmissions and Worsening Heart Failure Events in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Modeling Study.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者再入院及心力衰竭恶化事件预测的机器学习算法比较:建模研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 17;7:e41775. doi: 10.2196/41775.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Deep Learning and Traditional Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Plasma Proteomic Biomarkers.使用血浆蛋白质组学生物标志物预测轻度认知障碍的深度学习与传统机器学习模型比较
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 8;26(6):2428. doi: 10.3390/ijms26062428.
2
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for 30-day readmission in elderly type 2 diabetes patients complicated with heart failure: a multicenter, retrospective study.老年2型糖尿病合并心力衰竭患者30天再入院风险预测模型的开发与验证:一项多中心回顾性研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 27;16:1534516. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1534516. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning-based prediction of heart failure readmission or death: implications of choosing the right model and the right metrics.基于机器学习的心力衰竭再入院或死亡预测:选择正确模型和指标的意义。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;6(2):428-435. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12419. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
2
The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program-learning from failure of a healthcare policy.医院再入院率降低计划——从医疗政策失败中吸取教训。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Aug;20(8):1169-1174. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1212. Epub 2018 May 23.
3
Performance of the LACE index to predict 30-day hospital readmissions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Binge Drinking among Adults in the United State: Analysis of the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey.
基于机器学习的美国成年人暴饮行为预测:2022年健康信息国家趋势调查分析
Proc 2024 9th Int Conf Math Artif Intell (2024). 2024 May;2024:1-10. doi: 10.1145/3670085.3670090. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
4
Predictive Analytics in Heart Failure Risk, Readmission, and Mortality Prediction: A Review.心力衰竭风险、再入院和死亡率预测中的预测分析:综述
Cureus. 2024 Nov 17;16(11):e73876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73876. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
A machine learning model to predict heart failure readmission: toward optimal feature set.一种预测心力衰竭再入院的机器学习模型:迈向最优特征集
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Feb 21;7:1363226. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1363226. eCollection 2024.
6
An Interpretable Approach with Explainable AI for Heart Stroke Prediction.一种使用可解释人工智能进行中风预测的可解释方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 5;14(2):128. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14020128.
7
Predicting health insurance uptake in Kenya using Random Forest: An analysis of socio-economic and demographic factors.利用随机森林预测肯尼亚的医疗保险参保率:社会经济和人口因素分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0294166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294166. eCollection 2023.
8
Artificial intelligence with temporal features outperforms machine learning in predicting diabetes.具有时间特征的人工智能在预测糖尿病方面优于机器学习。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Oct 25;2(10):e0000354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000354. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Virtual healthcare solutions in heart failure: a literature review.心力衰竭的虚拟医疗解决方案:文献综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 7;10:1231000. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1231000. eCollection 2023.
10
Improved performance of machine learning models in predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific variables.使用患者特定变量的机器学习模型在预测全膝关节置换术后住院时间、出院处置和住院死亡率方面的性能得到改善。
Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul 2;5(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00187-2.
LACE指数预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者30天内再入院情况的效能
Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 27;10:51-59. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S149574. eCollection 2018.
4
Machine learning in heart failure: ready for prime time.心力衰竭中的机器学习:准备好迎接黄金时代。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2018 Mar;33(2):190-195. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000491.
5
Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure.心力衰竭的全球公共卫生负担。
Card Fail Rev. 2017 Apr;3(1):7-11. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2016:25:2.
6
Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Heart Failure Readmissions.心力衰竭再入院的机器学习技术分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):629-640. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003039. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
7
Long-term use of secondary prevention medications for heart failure in Western Australia: a protocol for a population-based cohort study.西澳大利亚州心力衰竭二级预防药物的长期使用:一项基于人群队列研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 1;6(11):e014397. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014397.
8
Telemonitoring predicts in advance heart failure admissions.远程监测可提前预测心力衰竭住院情况。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;216:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.149. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
9
A comparison of models for predicting early hospital readmissions.预测早期医院再入院的模型比较。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Aug;56:229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
10
Long-term use and cost-effectiveness of secondary prevention drugs for heart disease in Western Australian seniors (WAMACH): a study protocol.西澳大利亚老年人心脏病二级预防药物的长期使用及成本效益(WAMACH):一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 18;4(9):e006258. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006258.