• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习模型预测心力衰竭患者 30 天再入院风险:电子病历数据的回顾性分析。

A machine learning model to predict the risk of 30-day readmissions in patients with heart failure: a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records data.

机构信息

Partners Connected Health Innovation, Partners HealthCare, 25 New Chardon St., Suite 300, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Research and Development Group, Hitachi, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jun 22;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0620-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-018-0620-z
PMID:29929496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6013959/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is one of the leading causes of hospitalization in the United States. Advances in big data solutions allow for storage, management, and mining of large volumes of structured and semi-structured data, such as complex healthcare data. Applying these advances to complex healthcare data has led to the development of risk prediction models to help identify patients who would benefit most from disease management programs in an effort to reduce readmissions and healthcare cost, but the results of these efforts have been varied. The primary aim of this study was to develop a 30-day readmission risk prediction model for heart failure patients discharged from a hospital admission.

METHODS

We used longitudinal electronic medical record data of heart failure patients admitted within a large healthcare system. Feature vectors included structured demographic, utilization, and clinical data, as well as selected extracts of un-structured data from clinician-authored notes. The risk prediction model was developed using deep unified networks (DUNs), a new mesh-like network structure of deep learning designed to avoid over-fitting. The model was validated with 10-fold cross-validation and results compared to models based on logistic regression, gradient boosting, and maxout networks. Overall model performance was assessed using concordance statistic. We also selected a discrimination threshold based on maximum projected cost saving to the Partners Healthcare system.

RESULTS

Data from 11,510 patients with 27,334 admissions and 6369 30-day readmissions were used to train the model. After data processing, the final model included 3512 variables. The DUNs model had the best performance after 10-fold cross-validation. AUCs for prediction models were 0.664 ± 0.015, 0.650 ± 0.011, 0.695 ± 0.016 and 0.705 ± 0.015 for logistic regression, gradient boosting, maxout networks, and DUNs respectively. The DUNs model had an accuracy of 76.4% at the classification threshold that corresponded with maximum cost saving to the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Deep learning techniques performed better than other traditional techniques in developing this EMR-based prediction model for 30-day readmissions in heart failure patients. Such models can be used to identify heart failure patients with impending hospitalization, enabling care teams to target interventions at their most high-risk patients and improving overall clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭是美国住院的主要原因之一。大数据解决方案的进步使得对大量结构化和半结构化数据(如复杂的医疗保健数据)的存储、管理和挖掘成为可能。将这些进展应用于复杂的医疗保健数据,已经开发出风险预测模型,以帮助识别最受益于疾病管理计划的患者,从而降低再入院率和医疗保健成本,但这些努力的结果各不相同。本研究的主要目的是为从医院出院的心力衰竭患者开发 30 天再入院风险预测模型。

方法

我们使用大型医疗保健系统内心力衰竭患者的纵向电子病历数据。特征向量包括结构化的人口统计学、利用和临床数据,以及从临床医生撰写的笔记中选择的非结构化数据的摘录。使用深度统一网络(DUN)开发风险预测模型,DUN 是一种新的网格状深度学习网络结构,旨在避免过度拟合。该模型使用 10 折交叉验证进行验证,并与基于逻辑回归、梯度提升和 maxout 网络的模型进行比较。使用一致性统计量评估整体模型性能。我们还根据对 Partners Healthcare 系统的最大预期成本节约选择了一个判别阈值。

结果

使用 11510 名患者的 27334 次入院和 6369 次 30 天再入院的数据来训练模型。经过数据处理,最终模型包括 3512 个变量。DUNs 模型在 10 折交叉验证后表现最佳。预测模型的 AUC 分别为 0.664±0.015、0.650±0.011、0.695±0.016 和 0.705±0.015,逻辑回归、梯度提升、maxout 网络和 DUNs 分别为 0.664±0.015、0.650±0.011、0.695±0.016 和 0.705±0.015。DUNs 模型在对应于医院最大成本节约的分类阈值下的准确率为 76.4%。

结论

与其他传统技术相比,深度学习技术在开发基于 EMR 的心力衰竭患者 30 天再入院预测模型方面表现更好。此类模型可用于识别即将住院的心力衰竭患者,使护理团队能够将干预措施针对高危患者,从而改善整体临床结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2179/6013959/c4cc0531c324/12911_2018_620_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2179/6013959/908bd49f30d1/12911_2018_620_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2179/6013959/2302886d1647/12911_2018_620_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2179/6013959/e2163fd12ee1/12911_2018_620_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2179/6013959/5c74eedabd53/12911_2018_620_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2179/6013959/c4cc0531c324/12911_2018_620_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2179/6013959/908bd49f30d1/12911_2018_620_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2179/6013959/2302886d1647/12911_2018_620_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2179/6013959/e2163fd12ee1/12911_2018_620_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2179/6013959/5c74eedabd53/12911_2018_620_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2179/6013959/c4cc0531c324/12911_2018_620_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A machine learning model to predict the risk of 30-day readmissions in patients with heart failure: a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records data.机器学习模型预测心力衰竭患者 30 天再入院风险:电子病历数据的回顾性分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jun 22;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0620-z.
2
Prediction of 30-Day All-Cause Readmissions in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: Comparison of Machine Learning and Other Statistical Approaches.预测因心力衰竭住院患者的 30 天全因再入院率:机器学习与其他统计学方法的比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):204-209. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3956.
3
PREDICTIVE MODELING OF HOSPITAL READMISSION RATES USING ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD-WIDE MACHINE LEARNING: A CASE-STUDY USING MOUNT SINAI HEART FAILURE COHORT.使用全电子病历机器学习对医院再入院率进行预测建模:以西奈山心力衰竭队列为例的研究
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2017;22:276-287. doi: 10.1142/9789813207813_0027.
4
Readmission prediction using deep learning on electronic health records.基于电子健康记录的深度学习再入院预测。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Sep;97:103256. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103256. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
5
Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Heart Failure Readmissions.心力衰竭再入院的机器学习技术分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):629-640. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003039. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
An automated model to identify heart failure patients at risk for 30-day readmission or death using electronic medical record data.利用电子病历数据建立自动模型识别 30 天内再入院或死亡风险的心力衰竭患者。
Med Care. 2010 Nov;48(11):981-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ef60d9.
7
Predicting 30-day Hospital Readmission with Publicly Available Administrative Database. A Conditional Logistic Regression Modeling Approach.利用公开可用的行政数据库预测30天再入院情况。一种条件逻辑回归建模方法。
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(6):560-7. doi: 10.3414/ME14-02-0017. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
8
Improving the Prognostic Evaluation Precision of Hospital Outcomes for Heart Failure Using Admission Notes and Clinical Tabular Data: Multimodal Deep Learning Model.利用入院记录和临床表格数据提高心力衰竭住院结局预后评估的精准度:多模态深度学习模型。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 2;26:e54363. doi: 10.2196/54363.
9
Neural networks versus Logistic regression for 30 days all-cause readmission prediction.神经网络与逻辑回归在 30 天全因再入院预测中的比较。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 26;9(1):9277. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45685-z.
10
Machine learning and LACE index for predicting 30-day readmissions after heart failure hospitalization in elderly patients.机器学习和 LACE 指数在预测老年心力衰竭住院患者 30 天再入院中的应用。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;17(6):1727-1737. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-02996-w. Epub 2022 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating multiple feature assessment methods to identify key predictors of repeat suicide attempts in Taiwan.整合多种特征评估方法以识别台湾地区重复自杀未遂的关键预测因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 29;25(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07252-x.
2
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Financial Systems in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Studies.人工智能对医疗保健金融系统的影响:经济评估研究的系统综述
Cureus. 2025 Jun 18;17(6):e86279. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86279. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Predicting ICU mortality in heart failure patients based on blood tests and vital signs.

本文引用的文献

1
Deep Learning for Health Informatics.用于健康信息学的深度学习
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jan;21(1):4-21. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2636665. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
2
Readmission Rates After Passage of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: A Pre-Post Analysis.医院再入院率降低计划通过后的再入院率:一项前后分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 7;166(5):324-331. doi: 10.7326/M16-0185. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
3
PREDICTIVE MODELING OF HOSPITAL READMISSION RATES USING ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD-WIDE MACHINE LEARNING: A CASE-STUDY USING MOUNT SINAI HEART FAILURE COHORT.
基于血液检测和生命体征预测心力衰竭患者在重症监护病房的死亡率。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 25;12:1590367. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1590367. eCollection 2025.
4
Neural network models for predicting readmission among patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention using electronic health record data and clinical registry data.使用电子健康记录数据和临床登记数据预测接受外周血管介入治疗患者再入院情况的神经网络模型。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2025 Jun 26;7(1):e000387. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2025-000387. eCollection 2025.
5
Integrating Remote Patient Monitoring Data into Machine Learning Models for Predicting Emergency Department Utilization.将远程患者监测数据整合到用于预测急诊科利用率的机器学习模型中。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:398-406. eCollection 2024.
6
Machine learning algorithms to predict heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among patients with premature myocardial infarction.用于预测心肌梗死患者射血分数保留的心力衰竭的机器学习算法。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 7;12:1571185. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1571185. eCollection 2025.
7
Role of artificial intelligence in early identification and risk evaluation of non-communicable diseases: a bibliometric analysis of global research trends.人工智能在非传染性疾病早期识别与风险评估中的作用:全球研究趋势的文献计量分析
BMJ Open. 2025 May 2;15(5):e101169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101169.
8
Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular practice.心血管实践中的人工智能
Nurse Pract. 2025 May 1;50(5):13-24. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000000000000312. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
9
Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular practice.心血管实践中的人工智能
JAAPA. 2025 May 1;38(5):21-30. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000204. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
10
Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.用于预测心力衰竭死亡率和再入院的机器学习方法评估:荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 7;25(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04700-0.
使用全电子病历机器学习对医院再入院率进行预测建模:以西奈山心力衰竭队列为例的研究
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2017;22:276-287. doi: 10.1142/9789813207813_0027.
4
Prediction of 30-Day All-Cause Readmissions in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: Comparison of Machine Learning and Other Statistical Approaches.预测因心力衰竭住院患者的 30 天全因再入院率:机器学习与其他统计学方法的比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):204-209. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3956.
5
Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review.预测28天或30天非计划住院再入院的模型效用:一项更新的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 27;6(6):e011060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011060.
6
Trends in 30-Day Readmission Rates for Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure: Findings From the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry.心力衰竭住院患者30天再入院率趋势:来自“遵循指南-心力衰竭注册研究”的结果
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002594.
7
Big data analytics to improve cardiovascular care: promise and challenges.大数据分析改善心血管护理:前景与挑战。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 Jun;13(6):350-9. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.42. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
8
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2016年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38-360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
9
Non-cardiovascular comorbidity, severity and prognosis in non-selected heart failure populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非选择性心力衰竭人群中的非心血管合并症、严重程度及预后:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Oct 1;196:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.05.180. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
10
A comparison of models for predicting early hospital readmissions.预测早期医院再入院的模型比较。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Aug;56:229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 1.