• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔癌患者口腔健康相关患者报告结局测量工具的测量特性:使用 COSMIN 清单的系统评价。

Measurement properties of oral health related patient reported outcome measures in patients with oral cancer: A systematic review using COSMIN checklist.

机构信息

Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Government Dental College & Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Dentistry, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College & Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra State, India.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jun 27;14(6):e0218833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218833. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0218833
PMID:31247007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6597073/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral cancer (OC) is one of the common malignant neoplasm resulting in a range of debilitating symptoms. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) could provide a valuable insight into the impact of OC on patients' quality of life (QoL). Selecting an adequate instrument among available PROMs for OC has been challenging for clinicians due to lack of information on their psychometric quality. This systematic review provides an extensive overview of methodological quality of all currently available PROMs for OC.

METHOD

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL for relevant literature until 10th January 2019 and data was extracted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the identified studies was assessed per measurement property according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurements Instruments (COSMIN) checklist.

RESULTS

Seven studies were found evaluating 6 health-related QoL PROMs. Among six, there were 1 disease-specific and 5 generic PROMs. Information regarding important measurement properties was often incomplete. The evidence for the quality of measurement properties was found to be variable, none of the instruments performed sufficient on all measurement properties. Considering results of this review, QOL-OC appeared to have adequate COSMIN measurement properties.

CONCLUSION

QOL-OC can be implemented in future studies to better understand symptoms and expectations of OC patients and help inform clinicians to formulate treatment strategies as per patients' needs.

摘要

背景

口腔癌(OC)是常见的恶性肿瘤之一,会导致一系列使人虚弱的症状。患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)可以为了解 OC 对患者生活质量(QoL)的影响提供有价值的见解。由于缺乏有关其心理测量质量的信息,临床医生在选择 OC 可用的 PROM 中合适的工具方面一直具有挑战性。本系统评价全面概述了目前所有 OC 的 PROM 的心理测量质量。

方法

我们在 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 中进行了系统搜索,以查找相关文献,检索时间截至 2019 年 1 月 10 日,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南提取数据。根据共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单,按照测量特性对确定研究的质量进行评估。

结果

我们发现了 7 项评估 6 种与健康相关的 QoL PROM 的研究。其中 6 项中有 1 项疾病特异性和 5 项通用 PROM。有关重要测量特性的信息通常不完整。测量特性质量的证据发现是可变的,没有一种仪器在所有测量特性上表现都足够好。考虑到本综述的结果,QOL-OC 似乎具有足够的 COSMIN 测量特性。

结论

QOL-OC 可以在未来的研究中实施,以更好地了解 OC 患者的症状和期望,并帮助临床医生根据患者的需求制定治疗策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5468/6597073/e9239cb1363c/pone.0218833.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5468/6597073/e9239cb1363c/pone.0218833.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5468/6597073/e9239cb1363c/pone.0218833.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Measurement properties of oral health related patient reported outcome measures in patients with oral cancer: A systematic review using COSMIN checklist.口腔癌患者口腔健康相关患者报告结局测量工具的测量特性:使用 COSMIN 清单的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 27;14(6):e0218833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218833. eCollection 2019.
2
Assessment of oral health-related quality of life instruments for oral submucous fibrosis: A systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist.口腔黏膜下纤维性变的口腔健康相关生活质量评估工具评估:使用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单的系统评价。
Oral Oncol. 2019 Jun;93:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
3
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.评估膀胱癌患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
4
Patient Reported Outcome Measures Used to Assess Quality of Life in Aortic Dissection: a Systematic Scoping Review using COSMIN Methodology.用于评估主动脉夹层患者生活质量的患者报告结局指标:一项使用COSMIN方法的系统综述。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Sep;66(3):343-350. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.06.032. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Maternal Postpartum Depression Using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Guideline: A Systematic Review.采用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估产妇产后抑郁症患者报告结局测量指标:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2214885. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14885.
6
Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review protocol.用于慢性肾脏病成年患者的患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的测量特性:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 12;6(10):e012014. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012014.
7
Assessing the quality of available patient reported outcome measures for intermittent claudication: a systematic review using the COSMIN checklist.评估间歇性跛行患者报告结局测量工具的质量:使用 COSMIN 清单的系统评价。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;49(3):316-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
8
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
A Quality Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Sexual Function in Neurologic Patients Using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Checklist: A Systematic Review.采用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准清单对神经患者性功能的患者报告结局测量进行质量评估:系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Oct;3(4-5):444-456. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
10
Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review.糖尿病患者报告结局测量量表的测量特性:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 13;23(8):e25002. doi: 10.2196/25002.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures of health-related quality of life across the European cancer continuum: a systematic review protocol using COSMIN methodology.欧洲癌症全程患者报告的健康相关生活质量结局指标的心理测量学特性评估:一项使用COSMIN方法的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e088716. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088716.
2
Examination of validity, reliability, and interpretability of a self-reported questionnaire on Occupational Balance in Informal Caregivers (OBI-Care) - A Rasch analysis.非正式照顾者职业平衡自我报告问卷(OBI-Care)的效度、信度和可解释性检验——拉施分析
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261815. eCollection 2021.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016.印度各邦癌症负担及其变化:1990-2016 年全球疾病负担研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1289-1306. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30447-9. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
2
Development and evaluation of oral Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire (QOL-OC).口腔癌生命质量问卷(QOL-OC)的编制与评价。
BMC Cancer. 2018 May 3;18(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4378-6.
3
Using PROMs to guide patients and practitioners through the head and neck cancer journey.
Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Positive Psychosocial Constructs in Children and Adolescent/Young Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.
评估癌症患儿和青少年正性心理社会构念的患者报告结局测量指标:测量特性的系统评价。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2022 Feb;11(1):78-94. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0031. Epub 2021 May 13.
使用患者报告结局测量信息(PROMs)来指导患者和从业者度过头颈癌治疗过程。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2017 Nov 8;8:133-142. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S129012. eCollection 2017.
4
Using PROMs in Healthcare: Who Should Be in the Driving Seat-Policy Makers, Health Professionals, Methodologists or Patients?在医疗保健中使用患者报告结局指标(PROMs):应由谁来主导——政策制定者、医疗专业人员、方法学家还是患者?
Patient. 2016 Dec;9(6):495-498. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0197-5.
5
Prevalence of oral squamous cell carcinoma of tongue in and around Davangere, Karnataka, India: A retrospective study over 13 years.印度卡纳塔克邦达万盖尔及其周边地区舌部口腔鳞状细胞癌的患病率:一项为期13年的回顾性研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S491-4. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163511.
6
Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma--an update.口腔和口咽鳞状细胞癌——最新进展。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Sep-Oct;65(5):401-21. doi: 10.3322/caac.21293. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
7
Evaluation of the quality of life of patients before treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck by means of chemoradiotherapy.通过放化疗对头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者治疗前的生活质量进行评估。
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2015;19(2):148-53. doi: 10.5114/wo.2015.51420. Epub 2015 May 13.
8
Pain and Physical Functioning in Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties of Various Outcome Measures.神经病理性疼痛中的疼痛与身体功能:各种结局指标心理测量特性的系统评价
Pain Pract. 2016 Apr;16(4):495-508. doi: 10.1111/papr.12293. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
9
The Validation and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Speech Handicap Index for Patients With Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer.口腔和口咽癌患者中文版言语障碍指数的效度和信度
J Voice. 2016 Mar;30(2):247.e23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
10
Validity of patient-reported swallowing and speech outcomes in relation to objectively measured oral function among patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer.在接受口腔或口咽癌治疗的患者中,患者报告的吞咽和言语结果与客观测量的口腔功能之间的相关性。
Dysphagia. 2015 Apr;30(2):196-204. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9595-9. Epub 2015 Jan 28.