Center for Memory and Brain, and
Graduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.
J Neurosci. 2019 Aug 28;39(35):6936-6952. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1420-18.2019. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
There is widespread agreement that episodic memory is organized into a timeline of past experiences. Recent work suggests that the hippocampus may parse the flow of experience into discrete episodes separated by event boundaries. A complementary body of work suggests that context changes gradually as experience unfolds. We recorded from hippocampal neurons as male Long-Evans rats performed 6 blocks of an object discrimination task in sets of 15 trials. Each block was separated by removal from the testing chamber for a delay to enable segmentation. The reward contingency reversed from one block to the next to incentivize segmentation. We expected animals to hold two distinct, recurring representations of context to match the two distinct rule contingencies. Instead, we found that overtrained rats began each block neither above nor below chance but by guessing randomly. While many units had clear firing fields selective to the conjunction of objects in places, a significant population also reflected a continuously drifting code both within block and across blocks. Despite clear boundaries between blocks, we saw no neural evidence for event segmentation in this experiment. Rather, the hippocampal ensemble drifted continuously across time. This continuous drift in the neural representation was consistent with the lack of segmentation observed in behavior. The neuroscience literature yet to reach consensus on how the hippocampus supports the organization of events across time in episodic memory. Initial studies reported stable hippocampal maps segmented by remapping events. However, it remains unclear whether segmentation is an artifact of cue responsivity. Recently, research has shown that the hippocampal code exhibits continuous drift. Drift may represent a continually evolving context; however, it is unclear whether this is an artifact of changing experiences. We recorded dCA1 in rats performing an object discrimination task designed to segment time. Overtrained rats could not anticipate upcoming context switches but used context boundaries to their advantage. Hippocampal ensembles showed neither evidence of alternating between stable contexts nor sensitivity to boundaries, but showed robust temporal drift.
人们普遍认为,情景记忆是按照过去经历的时间顺序组织起来的。最近的研究表明,海马体可能会将经验的流动分割成离散的事件,这些事件由事件边界隔开。另一组互补的研究表明,随着经验的展开,上下文会逐渐变化。我们记录了雄性长耳大野鼠在进行 15 次试验的 6 组物体辨别任务时海马神经元的活动。每个块都通过从测试室中移除以进行延迟来分隔,以便进行分段。奖励条件从一个块到下一个块反转,以激励分段。我们期望动物能保持两个不同的、反复出现的上下文表示,以匹配两个不同的规则条件。然而,我们发现,过度训练的老鼠在每个块开始时都不是高于或低于机会水平,而是随机猜测。虽然许多单位对物体在位置上的结合有明确的发射场选择性,但相当一部分单位也反映了一个在块内和跨块内持续漂移的代码。尽管块之间有明显的边界,但我们在这个实验中没有看到任何神经活动表明事件被分割。相反,海马体整体在时间上持续漂移。这种神经表示的连续漂移与行为中观察到的缺乏分割是一致的。神经科学文献尚未就海马体如何在情景记忆中支持时间上的事件组织达成共识。最初的研究报告称,稳定的海马体图谱通过重新映射事件进行分段。然而,目前还不清楚分段是否是线索反应性的一个人工制品。最近的研究表明,海马体的代码表现出连续的漂移。漂移可能代表着不断变化的上下文;然而,尚不清楚这是否是不断变化的经验的一个人工制品。我们在执行物体辨别任务的大鼠中记录了 dCA1 的活动,该任务旨在分割时间。过度训练的老鼠无法预测即将到来的上下文切换,但利用上下文边界来获得优势。海马体集合既没有表现出在稳定的上下文之间交替的证据,也没有对边界敏感,但表现出强烈的时间漂移。