Suppr超能文献

道德困境与人类-猪嵌合体的培育。

Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras.

机构信息

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

University of Melbourne Law School, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2019 Jul;45(7):440-446. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105227. Epub 2019 Jun 29.

Abstract

It may soon be possible to generate human organs inside of human-pig chimeras via a process called interspecies blastocyst complementation. This paper discusses what arguably the central ethical concern is raised by this potential source of transplantable organs: that farming human-pig chimeras for their organs risks perpetrating a serious moral wrong because the moral status of human-pig chimeras is uncertain, and potentially significant. Those who raise this concern usually take it to be unique to the creation of chimeric animals with 'humanised' brains. In this paper, we show how that the same style of argument can be used to critique current uses of non-chimeric pigs in agriculture. This reveals an important tension between two common moral views: that farming human-pig chimeras for their organs is ethically concerning, and that farming non-chimeric pigs for food or research is ethically benign. At least one of these views stands in need of revision.

摘要

通过一种称为种间囊胚互补的过程,在人猪嵌合体中生成人类器官可能很快成为现实。本文讨论了这种潜在的可移植器官来源引发的核心伦理问题:为了获取人猪嵌合体的器官而养殖它们可能会造成严重的道德错误,因为人猪嵌合体的道德地位不确定,而且具有潜在的重要性。那些提出这一担忧的人通常认为,这只存在于具有“人性化”大脑的嵌合动物的创造中。在本文中,我们展示了如何使用相同的论证风格来批判当前农业中非嵌合猪的使用。这揭示了两种常见道德观点之间的一个重要紧张关系:养殖人猪嵌合体获取器官在伦理上令人担忧,而养殖非嵌合猪用于食物或研究在伦理上是良性的。至少有一个观点需要修正。

相似文献

1
Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras.道德困境与人类-猪嵌合体的培育。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Jul;45(7):440-446. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105227. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
4
Time to rethink the law on part-human chimeras.是时候重新思考关于人兽嵌合体的法律了。
J Law Biosci. 2019 May 15;6(1):37-50. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsz005. eCollection 2019 Oct.
7
Price of precaution of human-pig chimeras for transplantation purposes.用于移植目的的人猪嵌合体的预防成本。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Jul;45(7):447-448. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105553. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

2
Conscientious objection: a global health perspective.良心拒服:全球健康视角
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Dec 27;9(12):e017555. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017555.
8
Moral Limits of Brain Organoid Research.脑类器官研究的道德界限。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Dec;47(4):760-767. doi: 10.1177/1073110519897789.

本文引用的文献

2
Do Chimeras Have Minds?嵌合体有思维吗?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Oct;26(4):577-591. doi: 10.1017/S0963180117000093.
4
5
Interspecies organogenesis generates autologous functional islets.种间器官发生可产生自体功能性胰岛。
Nature. 2017 Feb 9;542(7640):191-196. doi: 10.1038/nature21070. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
7
What's Wrong with Human/Nonhuman Chimera Research?人类/非人类嵌合体研究存在哪些问题?
PLoS Biol. 2016 Aug 30;14(8):e1002535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002535. eCollection 2016 Aug.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验