• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2008 年至 2017 年墨西哥剖宫产趋势。

Trends of caesarean delivery from 2008 to 2017, Mexico.

机构信息

Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, One Brigham Circle, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 4-020, Boston, MA 02120, United States of America (USA).

Division of Newborn Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Jul 1;97(7):502-512. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.224303. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

DOI:10.2471/BLT.18.224303
PMID:31258219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6593338/
Abstract

Caesarean delivery rates in Mexico are among the highest in the world. Given heightened public and professional awareness of this problem and the updated 2014 national guidelines to reduce the frequency of caesarean delivery, we analysed trends in caesarean delivery by type of facility in Mexico from 2008 to 2017. We obtained birth-certificate data from the Mexican General Directorate for Health Information and grouped the total number of vaginal and caesarean deliveries into five categories of facility: health-ministry hospitals; private hospitals; government employment-based insurance hospitals; military hospitals; and other facilities. Delivery rates were calculated for each category nationally and for each state. On average, 2 114 630 (95% confidence interval, CI: 2 061 487-2 167 773) live births occurred nationally each year between 2008 and 2017. Of these births, 53.5% (1 130 570; 95% CI: 1 108 068-1 153 072) were vaginal deliveries, and 45.3% (957 105; 95% CI: 922 936-991 274) were caesarean deliveries, with little variation over time. During the study period, the number of live births increased by 4.4% (from 1 978 380 to 2 064 507). The vaginal delivery rate decreased from 54.8% (1 083 331/1 978 380) to 52.9% (1 091 958/2 064 507), giving a relative percentage decrease in the rate of 3.5%. The caesarean delivery rate increased from 43.9% (869 018/1 978 380) to 45.5% (940 206/2 064 507), giving a relative percentage increase in the rate of 3.7%. The biggest change in delivery rates was in private-sector hospitals. Since 2014, rates of caesarean delivery have fallen slightly in all sectors, but they remain high at 45.5%. Policies with appropriate interventions are needed to reduce the caesarean delivery rate in Mexico, particularly in private-sector hospitals.

摘要

墨西哥的剖宫产率位居世界前列。鉴于公众和专业人士对这一问题的认识不断提高,以及 2014 年更新的降低剖宫产率的国家指导方针,我们分析了 2008 年至 2017 年期间墨西哥按医疗机构类型划分的剖宫产率趋势。我们从墨西哥卫生信息总局获得了出生证明数据,并将阴道分娩和剖宫产的总数分为五类医疗机构:卫生部医院;私立医院;政府就业为基础的保险医院;军队医院;和其他设施。按国家和每个州计算了每个类别的分娩率。平均而言,2008 年至 2017 年期间,全国每年有 2114630 名(95%置信区间,CI:2061487-2167773)活产。其中,53.5%(1130570;95%CI:1108068-1153072)为阴道分娩,45.3%(957105;95%CI:922936-991274)为剖宫产,时间变化不大。在此期间,活产数增加了 4.4%(从 1978380 人增加到 2064507 人)。阴道分娩率从 54.8%(1083331/1978380)降至 52.9%(1091958/2064507),下降了 3.5%。剖宫产率从 43.9%(869018/1978380)上升至 45.5%(940206/2064507),上升了 3.7%。分娩率最大的变化发生在私营部门医院。自 2014 年以来,所有部门的剖宫产率都略有下降,但仍保持在 45.5%的高位。墨西哥需要采取有适当干预措施的政策来降低剖宫产率,特别是在私营部门医院。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/62ebd354a7d1/BLT.18.224303-F6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/4685542a2f17/BLT.18.224303-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/3424171f1ff3/BLT.18.224303-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/b8a61ea6dfd5/BLT.18.224303-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/8bb2dcb237d4/BLT.18.224303-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/4c0101426246/BLT.18.224303-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/62ebd354a7d1/BLT.18.224303-F6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/4685542a2f17/BLT.18.224303-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/3424171f1ff3/BLT.18.224303-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/b8a61ea6dfd5/BLT.18.224303-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/8bb2dcb237d4/BLT.18.224303-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/4c0101426246/BLT.18.224303-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b18e/6593338/62ebd354a7d1/BLT.18.224303-F6.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends of caesarean delivery from 2008 to 2017, Mexico.2008 年至 2017 年墨西哥剖宫产趋势。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Jul 1;97(7):502-512. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.224303. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
2
Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births.2012年至2016年中国独生子女政策放宽与剖宫产率及出生结局的趋势:对近700万例医疗机构分娩的观察性研究
BMJ. 2018 Mar 5;360:k817. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k817.
3
Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016.评估 2005 年至 2016 年期间印度公立和私立医疗机构之间剖宫产率的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2015022. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15022.
4
Prevalence, Disparities, And Determinants Of Primary Cesarean Births Among First-Time Mothers In Mexico.墨西哥初产妇初次剖宫产的流行率、差异和决定因素。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Apr 1;36(4):714-722. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1084.
5
Secular trends in caesarean section rates over 20 years in a regional obstetric unit in Hong Kong.香港某地区产科单位20年间剖宫产率的长期趋势。
Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Aug;23(4):340-8. doi: 10.12809/hkmj176217. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
6
Caesarean sections and maternal mortality in Sao Paulo.圣保罗的剖宫产与孕产妇死亡率
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 May;132(1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Jul 28.
7
[Increasing use of cesarean section, even in developing countries].[剖宫产使用率不断上升,即使在发展中国家也是如此]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Jan 10;116(1):67-71.
8
Going public: do risk and choice explain differences in caesarean birth rates between public and private places of birth in Australia?公开上市:风险和选择是否解释了澳大利亚公共和私人分娩地点之间剖腹产率的差异?
Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):627-35. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
9
Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in private and public health facilities in underserved South Asian communities: cross-sectional analysis of data from Bangladesh, India and Nepal.南亚贫困社区私立和公立医疗机构剖宫产的患病率及影响因素:对孟加拉国、印度和尼泊尔数据的横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 30;4(12):e005982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005982.
10
Rates and Predictors of Caesarean Section for First and Second Births: A Prospective Cohort of Australian Women.首次和第二次分娩剖宫产的发生率及预测因素:澳大利亚女性的一项前瞻性队列研究
Matern Child Health J. 2017 May;21(5):1175-1184. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2216-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence, defect characteristics and risk factors associated with molar incisor hypomineralisation in Mexican schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study.墨西哥学龄儿童磨牙切牙矿化不全的患病率、缺损特征及相关危险因素:一项横断面研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01078-7.
2
Commercial milk formula marketing entry points: setting the course of infant and young child feeding trajectories.商业配方奶营销切入点:设定婴幼儿喂养轨迹。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 28;24(1):2653. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19997-3.
3
Association between location of prenatal care services and non-consented cesarean sections in Mexico: A secondary analysis of the National Survey on the Dynamics of Household Relationships 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
A dark day for universal health coverage.全民健康覆盖的黑暗之日。
Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):301-303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30118-7. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
2
Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies.减少健康妇女和婴儿不必要剖宫产的干预措施。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5.
3
FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic.国际妇产科联盟立场文件:如何遏制剖宫产流行趋势
墨西哥产前保健服务地点与非自愿剖宫产术的关联:对 2016 年家庭关系动态全国调查的二次分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 14;19(5):e0303052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303052. eCollection 2024.
4
Obstetric risk profiles and causes of death: Estimating their association with cesarean sections among maternal deaths in Mexico.产科风险概况和死亡原因:估计它们与墨西哥产妇死亡中剖宫产的关联。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0302369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302369. eCollection 2024.
5
Acculturation, Acculturative Stress, Experience of Discrimination, and Cesarean Birth in Mexican American Women.墨西哥裔美国女性的文化适应、文化适应压力、歧视经历与剖宫产。
Hisp Health Care Int. 2023 Dec;21(4):184-194. doi: 10.1177/15404153231164369. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
6
Evolution of cesarean sections in Colombia and its association with the legal standing of the institutions where deliveries take place.哥伦比亚剖宫产术的演变及其与分娩机构法律地位的关联。
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2023 Mar 30;74(1):15-27. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3901.
7
The portrayal and perceptions of cesarean section in Mexican media Facebook pages: a mixed-methods study.墨西哥媒体 Facebook 页面中对剖宫产的描述和看法:一项混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01351-8.
8
Hepcidin and other indicators of iron status, by alpha-1 acid glycoprotein levels, in a cohort of Mexican infants.α-1 酸性糖蛋白水平对墨西哥婴儿队列中铁状态相关指标(包括铁调素)的影响。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Apr;100(4):879-890. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04402-5. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
9
Perceived insufficient milk among primiparous, fully breastfeeding women: Is infant crying important?初产妇纯母乳喂养时的母乳不足感:婴儿哭闹重要吗?
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Jul;17(3):e13133. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13133. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
10
Factors associated with abandoning exclusive breastfeeding in Mexican mothers at two private hospitals.与墨西哥两所私立医院的母亲放弃纯母乳喂养相关的因素。
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 Aug 19;15(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13006-020-00316-6.
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1286-1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32113-5.
4
From therapeutic to elective cesarean deliveries: factors associated with the increase in cesarean deliveries in Chiapas.从治疗性剖宫产到选择性剖宫产:恰帕斯州剖宫产率上升的相关因素。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 May 25;16(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0582-2.
5
Prevalence, Disparities, And Determinants Of Primary Cesarean Births Among First-Time Mothers In Mexico.墨西哥初产妇初次剖宫产的流行率、差异和决定因素。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Apr 1;36(4):714-722. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1084.
6
Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产与医院的营利性质:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013670. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013670.
7
Indications for Cesarean Delivery in Mexico: Evaluation of Appropriate Use and Justification.墨西哥剖宫产的指征:合理使用与理由评估
Birth. 2017 Mar;44(1):78-85. doi: 10.1111/birt.12259. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
8
The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.剖宫产率的上升趋势:全球、区域和国家估计:1990 - 2014年
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. eCollection 2016.
9
Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality.剖宫产率与母婴死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2263-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15553.
10
Obstetric care and method of delivery in Mexico: results from the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey.墨西哥的产科护理与分娩方式:2012年全国健康与营养调查结果
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 7;9(8):e104166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104166. eCollection 2014.