Rice Karen L, Castex Julie, Redmond Margaret, Burton Jeffrey, Guo Jia-Wen, Beck Susan L
Center for Nursing Research, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA.
Palliative Medicine, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA.
Ochsner J. 2019 Summer;19(2):77-95. doi: 10.31486/toj.18.0164.
Inadequate pain management and undertreatment remain a serious clinical issue among hospitalized adults, contributing to chronic pain syndromes and opioid dependency. Implementation of individual pain care interventions has been insufficient to improve pain care quality. The purpose of this interprofessional, patient-centered project was to implement a 6-component bundle of evidence-based pain management strategies to improve patients' perception of pain care quality and 24-hour pain experience outcomes. A quasi-experimental design was used to test the effect of a bundled pain management intervention on 3 medical surgical units. Baseline outcomes using the Pain Care Quality-Interdisciplinary (PainCQ-I) and Pain Care Quality-Nursing (PainCQ-N) surveys were measured monthly for 4 months preintervention and 30 months postintervention. A convenience sample of 846 patients was analyzed. The effect of the intervention on pain outcomes could not be tested because unit-based adherence did not meet the goal of 80%. A subsample of 70.2% (594/846) of participants was sufficient to complete a 3-group analysis of preintervention and postintervention participants with confirmed intervention adherence. Participants in the postintervention group who received all 6 components (n=65) had significantly higher odds of higher PainCQ scores than those in the preintervention group (n=141) (PainCQ-I: odds ratio [OR] 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-4.42; PainCQ-N: OR 3.82, 95% CI 2.06-7.09) or those in the postintervention group receiving ≤5 components (n=388) (PainCQ-I: OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.57-4.03; PainCQ-N: OR 3.84, 95% CI 2.17-6.80). Medical surgical patients participating in this study who received the bundled 6-component intervention reported significantly higher levels of perceived pain care quality, suggesting that a bundled approach may be more beneficial than unstandardized strategies.
疼痛管理不足和治疗不充分仍是住院成年患者中的一个严重临床问题,会导致慢性疼痛综合征和阿片类药物依赖。实施个体化疼痛护理干预不足以提高疼痛护理质量。这个以患者为中心的跨专业项目的目的是实施一套包含6个组成部分的循证疼痛管理策略,以改善患者对疼痛护理质量的认知以及24小时疼痛体验结果。采用准实验设计来测试一套综合疼痛管理干预措施对3个内科外科病房的效果。在干预前4个月和干预后30个月,每月使用疼痛护理质量-跨学科(PainCQ-I)和疼痛护理质量-护理(PainCQ-N)调查问卷来测量基线结果。对846名患者的便利样本进行了分析。由于基于病房的依从性未达到80%的目标,因此无法测试干预对疼痛结果的影响。70.2%(594/846)的参与者子样本足以对干预前和干预后且干预依从性得到确认的参与者进行三组分析。接受全部6个组成部分的干预后组参与者(n = 65)的PainCQ得分高于干预前组参与者(n = 141)的几率显著更高(PainCQ-I:优势比[OR] 2.61,95%置信区间[CI] 1.54 - 4.42;PainCQ-N:OR 3.82,95% CI 2.06 - 7.09),也高于接受≤5个组成部分的干预后组参与者(n = 388)(PainCQ-I:OR 2.52,95% CI 1.57 - 4.03;PainCQ-N:OR 3.84,95% CI 2.17 - 6.80)。参与本研究并接受6个组成部分综合干预的内科外科患者报告的疼痛护理质量感知水平显著更高,这表明综合方法可能比未标准化的策略更有益。