• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy Challenges.可遗传基因组编辑的全球语境:国家与国际政策挑战。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 May;49(3):30-42. doi: 10.1002/hast.1006.
2
Responsible governance of human germline genome editing in China†.中国人类生殖系基因组编辑的负责任治理。
Biol Reprod. 2022 Jul 25;107(1):261-268. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioac114.
3
Governance of Heritable Human Gene Editing World-Wide and Beyond.人类可遗传基因编辑的全球治理及其他问题
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 31;19(11):6739. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116739.
4
The Experts Are Not Enough.专家还不够。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 May;49(3):43-44. doi: 10.1002/hast.1007.
5
Challenges to effective governance in a low income healthcare system: a qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions in Malawi.低收入医疗系统中有效治理面临的挑战:马拉维利益相关者认知的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06002-x.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Human Germ Line and Heritable Genome Editing: The Global Policy Landscape.人类生殖系与可遗传基因组编辑:全球政策格局。
CRISPR J. 2020 Oct;3(5):365-377. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2020.0082.
8
Societal and Ethical Impacts of Germline Genome Editing: How Can We Secure Human Rights?种系基因组编辑的社会和伦理影响:如何保障人权?
CRISPR J. 2019 Oct;2(5):293-298. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0042.
9
A virtual deliberative public engagement study on heritable genome editing among South Africans: Study protocol.南非人群中可遗传基因组编辑的虚拟决策公众参与研究:研究方案。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0256097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256097. eCollection 2021.
10
The Role of Multistakeholder Platforms in Environmental Governance: Analyzing Stakeholder Perceptions in Kalomo District, Zambia, Using Q-Method.多利益相关方平台在环境治理中的作用:使用质方法分析赞比亚卡洛莫区的利益相关者感知
Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;74(1):13-30. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01806-z. Epub 2023 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Human Heritable Genome Editing and its Governance: Views of Scientists and Governance Professionals.人类可遗传基因组编辑及其治理:科学家和治理专业人士的观点
New Genet Soc. 2024;43(1). doi: 10.1080/14636778.2024.2404061. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Beyond the traditional distinctions of genome editing: evaluating a vulnerability framework.超越基因组编辑的传统区分:评估一个脆弱性框架。
Front Genome Ed. 2024 Oct 16;6:1426228. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2024.1426228. eCollection 2024.
3
Systematic scoping review of the concept of 'genetic identity' and its relevance for germline modification.系统范围综述“遗传身份”概念及其与生殖系修饰的相关性。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0228263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228263. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE.人类生殖系基因编辑中的负责任创新。ESHG和ESHRE建议的背景文件。
Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Jan 12;2018(1):hox024. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox024. eCollection 2018.
2
Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing.暂停可遗传的基因组编辑。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7747):165-168. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00726-5.
3
Fearful old world? A commentary on the Second International Summit on human genome editing.恐惧的旧世界?关于第二届人类基因组编辑国际峰会的评论
Mamm Genome. 2019 Feb;30(1-2):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s00335-018-9791-2. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
4
One small edit for humans, one giant edit for humankind? Points and questions to consider for a responsible way forward for gene editing in humans.对人类进行微小的编辑,为人类带来巨大的改变?人类基因编辑负责任的前进道路上需要考虑的要点和问题。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Jan;26(1):1-11. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0024-z. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
5
Marketing of unproven stem cell-based interventions: A call to action.未经证实的基于干细胞的干预措施的营销:行动呼吁。
Sci Transl Med. 2017 Jul 5;9(397). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag0426.
6
The illusion of control in germline-engineering policy.生殖系工程政策中的控制错觉。
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Jun 7;35(6):502-506. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3884.
7
First birth following spindle transfer for mitochondrial replacement therapy: hope and trepidation.线粒体替代疗法纺锤体移植后的首例分娩:希望与担忧
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Apr;34(4):333-336. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.004.
8
On the Road (to a Cure?)--Stem-Cell Tourism and Lessons for Gene Editing.《(通向治愈之路?)——干细胞旅游及基因编辑的教训》
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 10;374(10):901-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1600891. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
9
Germ line genome editing in clinics: the approaches, objectives and global society.临床中的生殖系基因组编辑:方法、目标与全球社会
Brief Funct Genomics. 2017 Jan;16(1):46-56. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elv053. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
10
Gene editing: Heed disability views.
Nature. 2015 Nov 26;527(7579):446. doi: 10.1038/527446a.

可遗传基因组编辑的全球语境:国家与国际政策挑战。

Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy Challenges.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 May;49(3):30-42. doi: 10.1002/hast.1006.

DOI:10.1002/hast.1006
PMID:31269262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6773219/
Abstract

A central problem for the international governance of heritable germline gene editing is that there are important differences in attitudes and values as well as ethical and health care considerations around the world. These differences are reflected in a complicated and diverse regulatory landscape. Several publications have discussed whether reproductive uses would be legally permissible in individual countries and whether clinical applications could emerge in the context of regulatory gaps and gray areas. Systematic comparative studies that explore issues related to the governance of this technology from different national and international perspectives are needed to address the lack of knowledge in this area. In this research report, we contribute to filling this gap by presenting views of stakeholders in the United Kingdom on challenges to the governance of heritable genome editing. We present findings from a multistakeholder study conducted in the United Kingdom between October 2016 and January 2018 and funded by the Wellcome Trust. This research included interviews, literature analysis, and a workshop. We involved leading U.K. scientists, in vitro fertilization clinicians, and representatives from regulatory bodies, patient organizations, and other civil societal organizations, as well as fertility companies. Part one of this article explores stakeholder perceptions of possible global developments in heritable genome editing and associated risks and governance challenges. Part two presents a range of policy options that were generated during the workshop in relation to the challenges discussed in part one.

摘要

遗传性 germline 基因编辑的国际治理面临的一个核心问题是,全世界在态度和价值观以及伦理和医疗保健方面存在重要差异。这些差异反映在复杂多样的监管格局中。有几篇出版物讨论了生殖用途在个别国家是否合法,以及在监管空白和灰色地带的情况下,临床应用是否可能出现。需要进行系统的比较研究,从不同的国家和国际角度探讨与该技术治理相关的问题,以弥补这一领域的知识空白。在本研究报告中,我们通过介绍英国利益相关者对遗传性基因组编辑治理的挑战的看法,为填补这一空白做出了贡献。我们展示了 2016 年 10 月至 2018 年 1 月期间在英国进行的一项多利益攸关方研究的结果,该研究由惠康信托基金会资助。这项研究包括访谈、文献分析和一次研讨会。我们邀请了英国领先的科学家、体外受精临床医生以及监管机构、患者组织和其他民间社会组织以及生育公司的代表参加。本文的第一部分探讨了利益相关者对遗传性基因组编辑可能的全球发展以及相关风险和治理挑战的看法。第二部分介绍了在研讨会期间针对第一部分讨论的挑战提出的一系列政策选择。