Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚一株隐匿性质粒缺陷型沙眼衣原体菌株导致衣原体聚合酶链反应结果假阴性

False-negative Chlamydia polymerase chain reaction result caused by a cryptic plasmid-deficient Chlamydia trachomatis strain in Australia.

作者信息

Sweeney Emma L, Bletchly Cheryl, Gupta Rita, Whiley David M

机构信息

University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQ-CCR), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia; and Corresponding author. Email:

Pathology Queensland, Central Laboratory, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia.

出版信息

Sex Health. 2019 Aug;16(4):394-396. doi: 10.1071/SH18205.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Background The 7.5-kb chlamydial cryptic plasmid remains a widely used sequence target for Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid amplification tests, but sequence variation in this plasmid, particularly a previously reported 377-bp deletion, can cause false-negative results. Here we report the presence in Australia of a C. trachomatis strain lacking the cryptic plasmid.

METHODS

A rectal swab from a male in his 50s provided a positive result for C. trachomatis using the Roche Cobas 4800 test, but a negative result in our confirmatory in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method targeting the chlamydial cryptic plasmid. This result was unexpected given our in-house PCR assay targeted a region of sequence outside the recognised 377-bp deletion. To further investigate this discrepancy, the sample was retested using a second in-house PCR targeting a chromosomal (ompA) gene as well as six primer sets flanking various regions of the cryptic plasmid.

RESULTS

The sample provided positive results in the second in-house method, confirming the presence of C. trachomatis DNA. All other primer sets targeting the cryptic plasmid failed to amplify, indicating a lack of the chlamydial cryptic plasmid in this sample.

CONCLUSIONS

The recognition of a plasmid-deficient strain of C. trachomatis within Australia highlights further limitations of using the chlamydial cryptic plasmid for C. trachomatis diagnostics and re-emphasises the benefits of using multitarget assays to avoid false-negative results.

摘要

未标记

背景 7.5kb 的衣原体隐蔽质粒仍然是沙眼衣原体核酸扩增检测中广泛使用的序列靶点,但该质粒的序列变异,特别是先前报道的 377bp 缺失,可能导致假阴性结果。在此我们报告在澳大利亚存在一株缺乏隐蔽质粒的沙眼衣原体菌株。

方法

一名 50 多岁男性的直肠拭子样本,使用罗氏 Cobas 4800 检测对沙眼衣原体呈阳性结果,但在我们针对衣原体隐蔽质粒的验证性内部聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法中呈阴性结果。鉴于我们的内部 PCR 检测针对的是公认的 377bp 缺失区域之外的一个序列区域,这个结果出乎意料。为了进一步调查这种差异,使用针对染色体(ompA)基因的第二种内部 PCR 以及侧翼位于隐蔽质粒各个区域的六组引物对样本进行重新检测。

结果

该样本在第二种内部方法中呈阳性结果,证实存在沙眼衣原体 DNA。所有其他针对隐蔽质粒的引物组均未能扩增,表明该样本中缺乏衣原体隐蔽质粒。

结论

在澳大利亚识别出一株缺乏质粒的沙眼衣原体菌株,凸显了使用衣原体隐蔽质粒进行沙眼衣原体诊断的进一步局限性,并再次强调了使用多靶点检测以避免假阴性结果的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验