Institute of HIV/AIDS, The First Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, The Rockefeller University, 455 First Avenue, Floor 7, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2019 Oct;23(10):2784-2794. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02587-5.
In a study of sexually-active HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) in China, we compared behavioral indication for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) based on risk criteria to self-perception of PrEP candidacy (SPC) and explored factors associated with SPC. Of 708 MSM surveyed, 323 (45.6%) were behaviorally-indicated for PrEP, among whom 42.1% self-perceived as appropriate PrEP candidates. In a multivariable model we found no association between sexual behavior nor HIV risk perception and SPC but found that higher perceived benefits of PrEP, increased frequency of HIV testing, and low condom use self-efficacy were positively-associated with SPC. In a sub-analysis restricted to MSM behaviorally-indicated for PrEP, relationship-factors were also significant. Our findings suggest that PrEP implementers should look beyond risk criteria to consider shared decision-making tools that support individuals to assess whether they are appropriate PrEP candidates based on their existing HIV prevention strategies, sexual health goals, and relationship dynamics.
在中国的一项针对性行为活跃的 HIV 阴性男男性行为者(MSM)的研究中,我们比较了基于风险标准的行为性提示与自我感知的 PrEP 适宜性(SPC),并探讨了与 SPC 相关的因素。在接受调查的 708 名 MSM 中,有 323 名(45.6%)有行为性提示需要 PrEP,其中 42.1%的人自我认为是 PrEP 的合适候选人。在多变量模型中,我们没有发现性行为或 HIV 风险感知与 SPC 之间存在关联,但发现更高的 PrEP 感知益处、增加 HIV 检测的频率以及较低的 condom 使用自我效能与 SPC 呈正相关。在仅限于行为提示需要 PrEP 的 MSM 的亚分析中,关系因素也是显著的。我们的研究结果表明,PrEP 的实施者应该超越风险标准,考虑使用共同决策工具,以支持个人根据他们现有的 HIV 预防策略、性健康目标和关系动态来评估他们是否是合适的 PrEP 候选人。