Department of Experimental Psychology, Regensburg University, 93040, Regensburg, Germany.
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jan;48(1):1-15. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00957-x.
Selectively retrieving details from memory can result in forgetting related information, a finding known as retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF). The effect has mostly been examined in individuals, but RIF can also be socially transmitted and arise in listeners who are exposed to a speaker's selective memory retrieval. Whether within-individual RIF (WI-RIF) in speakers and socially shared RIF (SS-RIF) in listeners arise on the basis of the same cognitive mechanisms is unclear, however. In four experiments, we assessed both WI-RIF and SS-RIF while varying final test format to examine the potential involvement of output interference, strength-based blocking, and inhibition. WI-RIF and, to a similar degree, SS-RIF were observed on cued-recall tests with and without controlled output order at test, indicating that output interference cannot account for the observed forgetting. In contrast, SS-RIF was reduced relative to WI-RIF on tests of item recognition. These findings are consistent with the view that inhibition and blocking contribute to both WI-RIF and SS-RIF, but that the contribution of inhibition is reduced in listeners relative to speakers.
从记忆中选择性地提取细节会导致遗忘相关信息,这种现象被称为提取诱发遗忘(retrieval-induced forgetting,RIF)。该效应主要在个体中进行了研究,但 RIF 也可以在听众中通过接触说话者的选择性记忆检索而被社交传递并产生。然而,个体内的 RIF(within-individual RIF,WI-RIF)和听众中的社会共享 RIF(socially shared RIF,SS-RIF)是否基于相同的认知机制尚不清楚。在四项实验中,我们评估了 WI-RIF 和 SS-RIF,同时改变最终测试格式,以检查输出干扰、基于强度的阻塞和抑制的潜在参与。在有和没有受控输出顺序的线索回忆测试中观察到 WI-RIF 和 SS-RIF,这表明输出干扰不能解释观察到的遗忘。相比之下,在项目识别测试中,SS-RIF 相对于 WI-RIF 减少。这些发现与以下观点一致,即抑制和阻塞会同时导致 WI-RIF 和 SS-RIF,但在听众中,抑制的贡献相对于说话者而言会减少。