• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会情境下的提取诱发遗忘:说话者和听话者遗忘的机制相同吗?

Retrieval-induced forgetting in a social context: Do the same mechanisms underlie forgetting in speakers and listeners?

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Regensburg University, 93040, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2020 Jan;48(1):1-15. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00957-x.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-019-00957-x
PMID:31286453
Abstract

Selectively retrieving details from memory can result in forgetting related information, a finding known as retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF). The effect has mostly been examined in individuals, but RIF can also be socially transmitted and arise in listeners who are exposed to a speaker's selective memory retrieval. Whether within-individual RIF (WI-RIF) in speakers and socially shared RIF (SS-RIF) in listeners arise on the basis of the same cognitive mechanisms is unclear, however. In four experiments, we assessed both WI-RIF and SS-RIF while varying final test format to examine the potential involvement of output interference, strength-based blocking, and inhibition. WI-RIF and, to a similar degree, SS-RIF were observed on cued-recall tests with and without controlled output order at test, indicating that output interference cannot account for the observed forgetting. In contrast, SS-RIF was reduced relative to WI-RIF on tests of item recognition. These findings are consistent with the view that inhibition and blocking contribute to both WI-RIF and SS-RIF, but that the contribution of inhibition is reduced in listeners relative to speakers.

摘要

从记忆中选择性地提取细节会导致遗忘相关信息,这种现象被称为提取诱发遗忘(retrieval-induced forgetting,RIF)。该效应主要在个体中进行了研究,但 RIF 也可以在听众中通过接触说话者的选择性记忆检索而被社交传递并产生。然而,个体内的 RIF(within-individual RIF,WI-RIF)和听众中的社会共享 RIF(socially shared RIF,SS-RIF)是否基于相同的认知机制尚不清楚。在四项实验中,我们评估了 WI-RIF 和 SS-RIF,同时改变最终测试格式,以检查输出干扰、基于强度的阻塞和抑制的潜在参与。在有和没有受控输出顺序的线索回忆测试中观察到 WI-RIF 和 SS-RIF,这表明输出干扰不能解释观察到的遗忘。相比之下,在项目识别测试中,SS-RIF 相对于 WI-RIF 减少。这些发现与以下观点一致,即抑制和阻塞会同时导致 WI-RIF 和 SS-RIF,但在听众中,抑制的贡献相对于说话者而言会减少。

相似文献

1
Retrieval-induced forgetting in a social context: Do the same mechanisms underlie forgetting in speakers and listeners?社会情境下的提取诱发遗忘:说话者和听话者遗忘的机制相同吗?
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jan;48(1):1-15. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00957-x.
2
Noncompetitive retrieval practice causes retrieval-induced forgetting in cued recall but not in recognition.非竞争性检索练习在线索回忆中会导致检索诱发遗忘,但在再认中则不会。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):400-8. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0372-z.
3
Forgetting in context: the effects of age, emotion, and social factors on retrieval-induced forgetting.语境遗忘:年龄、情绪和社会因素对提取诱发遗忘的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Aug;40(6):874-88. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0202-8.
4
Building consensus about the past: schema consistency and convergence in socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting.关于过去的共识构建:社会共享检索诱发遗忘中的图式一致性和收敛。
Memory. 2010 Feb;18(2):170-84. doi: 10.1080/09658210903159003.
5
Forgetting our personal past: socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting of autobiographical memories.忘记个人过去:社会共享的提取诱发自传体记忆遗忘。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1084-99. doi: 10.1037/a0030739. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
6
Forgetting the unforgettable through conversation: socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting of September 11 memories.通过对话忘却难以忘怀之事:社会共享的提取诱发遗忘对9·11事件记忆的影响
Psychol Sci. 2009 May;20(5):627-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02343.x.
7
The Mnemonic Consequences of Jurors' Selective Retrieval During Deliberation.陪审员在审议过程中选择性检索的记忆后果。
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Oct;11(4):627-643. doi: 10.1111/tops.12435. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
8
Less we forget: retrieval cues and release from retrieval-induced forgetting.切莫忘记:提取线索与提取诱发遗忘的释放。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Nov;40(8):1236-45. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0224-2.
9
Retrieval-induced forgetting in young children.儿童的提取诱发遗忘。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):704-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.704.
10
Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited.提取诱发遗忘:再探竞争性干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1433-48. doi: 10.1037/a0032975. Epub 2013 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Item Strength on Retrieval-Induced Forgetting in Social Interaction.项目强度对社交互动中提取诱发遗忘的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 15;14(10):950. doi: 10.3390/bs14100950.
2
More Lies Lead to More Memory Impairments in Daily Life.在日常生活中,更多的谎言会导致更多的记忆损伤。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 22;13:822788. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822788. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Building a collective memory: the case for collective forgetting.构建集体记忆:集体遗忘的案例。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Oct;23:88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
2
The testing effect in a social setting: Does retrieval practice benefit a listener?社交情境中的测试效应:检索练习对听众有益吗?
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2018 Sep;24(3):347-359. doi: 10.1037/xap0000148. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
3
Collaborative remembering revisited: Study context access modulates collaborative inhibition and later benefits for individual memory.
再探协同记忆:研究情境的可及性调节协同抑制及对个体记忆的后续益处。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Nov;45(8):1319-1334. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0737-9.
4
The testing effect under divided attention.分散注意力情况下的测试效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Dec;43(12):1934-1947. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000427. Epub 2017 May 15.
5
Attention and the testing effect.注意力与测试效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jun;42(6):938-50. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000227. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
6
Retrieval practice can insulate items against intralist interference: Evidence from the list-length effect, output interference, and retrieval-induced forgetting.检索练习可以使项目免受列表内干扰:来自列表长度效应、输出干扰和检索诱发遗忘的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Feb;42(2):202-14. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000172. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
7
Social identity and socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting: The effects of group membership.社会认同与社会共享检索诱发遗忘:群体成员身份的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Aug;144(4):717-722. doi: 10.1037/xge0000077. Epub 2015 May 4.
8
Selective memory retrieval in social groups: When silence is golden and when it is not.社会群体中的选择性记忆检索:何时沉默是金,何时并非如此。
Cognition. 2015 Jul;140:40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
9
Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: a meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting.提取导致遗忘:检索诱发遗忘的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Sep;140(5):1383-409. doi: 10.1037/a0037505.
10
Examining the costs and benefits of inhibition in memory retrieval.研究记忆检索中抑制作用的成本与收益。
Cognition. 2014 Nov;133(2):358-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Aug 14.