• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对超过 90000 名患者的系统评价与荟萃分析。快速通道审查是否能更早诊断结直肠癌?

Systematic review with meta-analysis of over 90 000 patients. Does fast-track review diagnose colorectal cancer earlier?

机构信息

University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.

The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Aug;50(4):348-372. doi: 10.1111/apt.15378. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1111/apt.15378
PMID:31286552
Abstract

BACKGROUND

National UK data on colorectal cancer (CRC) stage at diagnosis is incomplete. Site-specific fast-track (2-week wait) cancer data are not collected directly by NHS England. Policy making based on these data alone can lead to inaccuracy.

AIMS

To review available data on key outcomes (cancer conversion rate and stage at diagnosis) for the UK's lower gastrointestinal 2-week wait pathway.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted between 2000 and 2017. Primary outcomes were cancer conversion rate and cancer stage at diagnosis. Results were expressed as proportions with 95% CIs. A random effects model was used for meta-analysis; heterogeneity was assessed by I .

RESULTS

Of 95 papers reviewed, 49 were included in analysis with a total study population of 93,655. Cancer conversion rate was 7.7% (95% CI: 6.9-8.5). The proportion presenting at Dukes A = 11.2% (95% CI 7.4-15.6), B = 36.7% (95% CI 30.8-42.8), C = 35.7% (95% CI: 30.8-40.8) and D = 11.1% (95% CI 7.3-15.5). No colonic pathology was diagnosed in 54.6% (95% CI: 46.2-62.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 7.7% of patients referred by the 2-week wait pathway were found to have CRC. No beneficial effect on stage at diagnosis was found compared to non-2-week wait referral pathways. Over half of patients had no colonic pathology and detection of adenomas was very low. These results should prompt a reconsideration of the benefits of the 2-week wait pathway in CRC diagnosis and outcomes, with more focus on strategies to improve patient selection.

摘要

背景

英国全国范围内有关结直肠癌(CRC)诊断时分期的数据并不完整。英格兰国民保健署并未直接收集特定部位的快速通道(2 周等待)癌症数据。仅基于这些数据制定政策可能会导致不准确。

目的

综述英国下消化道 2 周等待通道关键结局(癌症转化率和诊断时分期)的现有数据。

方法

对 2000 年至 2017 年间的文献进行了全面检索。主要结局是癌症转化率和诊断时癌症分期。结果以 95%置信区间(CI)表示的比例表示。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析;通过 I 评估异质性。

结果

共回顾了 95 篇论文,其中 49 篇纳入分析,总研究人群为 93655 例。癌症转化率为 7.7%(95%CI:6.9-8.5)。Dukes A 分期为 11.2%(95%CI 7.4-15.6)、B 分期为 36.7%(95%CI 30.8-42.8)、C 分期为 35.7%(95%CI:30.8-40.8)和 D 分期为 11.1%(95%CI 7.3-15.5)的比例。54.6%(95%CI:46.2-62.8)的患者未发现结肠病变。

结论

仅 7.7%通过 2 周等待通道转诊的患者被诊断为 CRC。与非 2 周等待转诊途径相比,在诊断分期方面未发现有益效果。超过一半的患者没有结肠病变,并且腺瘤的检出率非常低。这些结果应促使重新考虑 2 周等待途径在 CRC 诊断和结局方面的益处,并更加关注改善患者选择的策略。

相似文献

1
Systematic review with meta-analysis of over 90 000 patients. Does fast-track review diagnose colorectal cancer earlier?对超过 90000 名患者的系统评价与荟萃分析。快速通道审查是否能更早诊断结直肠癌?
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Aug;50(4):348-372. doi: 10.1111/apt.15378. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
2
Assessment of a rapid referral pathway for suspected colorectal cancer in Madrid.马德里疑似结直肠癌快速转诊途径评估。
Fam Pract. 2012 Apr;29(2):182-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr080. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
3
The effectiveness of the '2-week wait' referral service for colorectal cancer.“2 周等待”转诊服务对结直肠癌的有效性。
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Nov;64(12):1671-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02505.x.
4
Straight-to-test for the two-week-wait colorectal cancer pathway under the updated NICE guidelines reduces time to cancer diagnosis and treatment.根据更新后的英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南,两周等待期结直肠癌诊疗路径中的直接检测可缩短癌症诊断和治疗时间。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 May;101(5):333-339. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0022.
5
The 2-week wait service: a UK tertiary colorectal centre's experience in the early identification of colorectal cancer.两周等待服务:英国一家三级结直肠中心在早期识别结直肠癌方面的经验。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;26(12):1408-14. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000206.
6
The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.在全科医疗中,直接转诊进行快速CT扫描对早期肺癌检测的效果。一项临床、整群随机试验。
Dan Med J. 2015 Mar;62(3).
7
How has the 'two-week wait' rule affected the presentation of colorectal cancer?“两周等待”规则对结直肠癌的就诊情况有何影响?
Colorectal Dis. 2005 Sep;7(5):450-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00821.x.
8
The two-week rule colorectal cancer pathway: an update on recent practice, the unsustainable burden on diagnostics and the role of faecal immunochemical testing.两周规则结直肠癌诊疗路径:近期实践的更新、诊断方面难以为继的负担以及粪便免疫化学检测的作用
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Apr;102(4):308-311. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0019. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
9
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the detection and management of colorectal cancer in England: a population-based study.COVID-19 大流行对英格兰结直肠癌检测和管理的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Mar;6(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00005-4. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
10
The effect of the 2-week wait referral system on the detection of and mortality from colorectal cancer: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.两周等待转诊系统对结直肠癌检测及死亡率的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 26;5(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0358-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Optimal Cancer Referrals Made by Primary Care Clinicians: Scoping Review.基层医疗临床医生进行最佳癌症转诊的特征:范围综述
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251359405. doi: 10.1177/10732748251359405. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Real-world data evaluating Guy's rapid diagnostic clinic as an alternate pathway for patients with FIT levels below 10.评估 Guy 的快速诊断诊所作为 FIT 水平低于 10 的患者的替代途径的真实世界数据。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 15;14(4):e080285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080285.
3
Colon capsule endoscopy investigation based on faecal haemoglobin concentration in symptomatic patients to detect bowel disease.
基于有症状患者粪便血红蛋白浓度的结肠胶囊内镜检查以检测肠道疾病。
BJS Open. 2024 Jan 3;8(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae007.
4
Colorectal Cancer Fast Tracks: Cancer Yield and the Predictive Value of Entry Criteria.结直肠癌快速通道:癌症检出率及入选标准的预测价值。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;15(19):4778. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194778.
5
Analysis of Time to Treatment and Survival Among Adults Younger Than 50 Years of Age With Colorectal Cancer in Canada.加拿大 50 岁以下结直肠癌患者的治疗时间和生存分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2327109. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27109.
6
A Point-of-Care Faecal Test Combining Four Biomarkers Allows Avoidance of Normal Colonoscopies and Prioritizes Symptomatic Patients with a High Risk of Colorectal Cancer.一种结合四种生物标志物的即时粪便检测可避免正常结肠镜检查,并优先处理有高风险的有症状结直肠癌患者。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;15(3):721. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030721.
7
A novel blood based triage test for colorectal cancer in primary care: a pilot study.基层医疗中一种用于结直肠癌的新型血液分诊检测:一项试点研究。
BJGP Open. 2023 Mar 21;7(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0077. Print 2023 Mar.
8
Time to diagnosis and treatment in younger adults with colorectal cancer: A systematic review.结直肠癌年轻患者的诊断和治疗时间:系统综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0273396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273396. eCollection 2022.
9
Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening among Average and High-Risk Saudis Population.沙特普通人群和高危人群中结直肠癌筛查的预测因素
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 20;12(5):662. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050662.
10
A cohort study of duplicate faecal immunochemical testing in patients at risk of colorectal cancer from North-West England.英格兰西北部结直肠癌高危人群粪便免疫化学重复检测的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 13;12(4):e059940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059940.