Department of Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Apr;52(2):607-629. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01263-9.
Wearable physiological measurement devices for ambulatory research with novel sensing technology are introduced with ever increasing frequency, requiring fast, standardized, and rigorous validation of the physiological signals measured by these devices and their derived parameters. At present, there is a lack of consensus on a standardized protocol or framework with which to test the validity of this new technology, leading to the use of various (often unfit) methods. This study introduces a comprehensive validity assessment protocol for physiological signals (electrodermal activity and cardiovascular activity) and investigates the validity of the E4 wearable (an example of such a new device) on the three levels proposed by the protocol: (1) the signal level, with a cross-correlation; (2) the parameter level, with Bland-Altman plots; and (3) the event level, with the detection of physiological changes due to external stressor levels via event difference plots. The results of the protocol show that the E4 wearable is valid for heart rate, RMSSD, and SD at the parameter and event levels, and for the total amplitude of skin conductance responses at the event level when studying strong sustained stressors. These findings are in line with the prior literature and demonstrate the applicability of the protocol. The validity assessment protocol proposed in this study provides a comprehensive, standardized, and feasible method for assessment of the quality of physiological data coming from new wearable (sensor) technology aimed at ambulatory research.
可穿戴生理测量设备结合新型传感技术,越来越频繁地被应用于动态研究,这就需要对这些设备所测量的生理信号及其衍生参数进行快速、标准化和严格的验证。目前,对于测试新技术有效性的标准化协议或框架缺乏共识,导致各种方法(通常不合适)的使用。本研究提出了一种全面的生理信号(皮肤电活动和心血管活动)有效性评估方案,并对 E4 可穿戴设备(这种新型设备的一个例子)在该方案提出的三个水平上进行了有效性研究:(1)信号水平,采用互相关;(2)参数水平,采用 Bland-Altman 图;(3)事件水平,采用事件差异图检测因外部应激水平引起的生理变化。该方案的结果表明,E4 可穿戴设备在参数和事件水平上对心率、RMSSD 和 SD 以及在研究强持续应激源时对皮肤电反应的总幅度具有有效性,这些发现与先前的文献一致,并证明了该方案的适用性。本研究提出的有效性评估方案为评估针对动态研究的新型可穿戴(传感器)技术的生理数据质量提供了一种全面、标准化和可行的方法。