• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病评分及对治疗的反应作为危重病预后的预测指标。

Sickness scoring and response to treatment as predictors of outcome from critical illness.

作者信息

Bion J F, Aitchison T C, Edlin S A, Ledingham I M

机构信息

Clinical Shock Study Group, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1988;14(2):167-72. doi: 10.1007/BF00257472.

DOI:10.1007/BF00257472
PMID:3129479
Abstract

A physiological sickness scoring system (SS), based on the APACHE II score, has been used to assess outcome from critical illness in 128 patients admitted to a general intensive care unit. Physiological data were collected on each patient from admission until death or discharge from the unit, and survival was recorded as survival to home. The admission SS correctly classified 80.6% of survivors, and 70.4% of non-survivors. Predictive power did not improve with time using the daily SS. However, when the proportional change in SS over time was included in the analysis, predictive power improved; and at day 4, 87.1% of survivors and 75% of non-survivors were correctly classified. At intermediate levels of sickness severity (admission score of 13-18), a reduction in SS of 30% by day 4 reduced the risk of death by 32%; at higher levels (greater than 18) a similar reduction in SS was associated with a 47% reduction in death-risk. Failure to obtain a reduction in score by day 4 was associated with increased risk of death. Survivors consistently showed a greater fall in SS by day 4 than non-survivors. The APACHE score and its modifications provide an accurate, unitary measure of physiological disturbance. Correction of abnormal physiology, and the measurement of responsiveness to therapy are important components in the prediction of outcome from critical illness.

摘要

一种基于急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)的生理疾病评分系统(SS),已用于评估入住综合重症监护病房的128例患者的危重病预后。从患者入院直至死亡或出院,收集每位患者的生理数据,并将存活情况记录为存活至出院回家。入院时的SS正确分类了80.6%的存活者和70.4%的非存活者。使用每日SS,预测能力并未随时间提高。然而,当分析中纳入SS随时间的比例变化时,预测能力有所提高;在第4天,87.1%的存活者和75%的非存活者被正确分类。在疾病严重程度中等水平(入院评分为13 - 18)时,到第4天SS降低30%可使死亡风险降低32%;在较高水平(大于18)时,类似的SS降低与死亡风险降低47%相关。到第4天未能使评分降低与死亡风险增加相关。存活者在第4天的SS下降幅度始终大于非存活者。APACHE评分及其改良版提供了一种准确、统一的生理紊乱测量方法。纠正异常生理状况以及衡量对治疗的反应性是预测危重病预后的重要组成部分。

相似文献

1
Sickness scoring and response to treatment as predictors of outcome from critical illness.疾病评分及对治疗的反应作为危重病预后的预测指标。
Intensive Care Med. 1988;14(2):167-72. doi: 10.1007/BF00257472.
2
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Glasgow coma scores as predictors of outcome from intensive care after cardiac arrest.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)及格拉斯哥昏迷评分作为心脏骤停后重症监护结局的预测指标。
Crit Care Med. 1991 Dec;19(12):1465-73. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199112000-00005.
3
One year's experience with the APACHE II severity of disease classification system in a general intensive care unit.
Anaesthesia. 1987 Jul;42(7):738-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb05319.x.
4
Verification of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit.香港一间重症监护病房中急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估评分系统的验证
Crit Care Med. 1993 May;21(5):698-705. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199305000-00013.
5
A comparison of APACHE II and a clinical sickness score. A study of 97 consecutive admissions to a district general hospital intensive care unit.
Anaesthesia. 1991 Jun;46(6):442-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb11679.x.
6
[The Heidelberg Intensive Care Unit Score. Development of a computer-assisted scoring system for documentation of treatment course and assessment of prognosis in surgical intensive care patients].[海德堡重症监护病房评分。一种用于记录手术重症监护患者治疗过程和评估预后的计算机辅助评分系统的开发]
Chirurg. 1995 May;66(5):513-8.
7
Evaluation of predictive ability of APACHE II system and hospital outcome in Canadian intensive care unit patients.评估APACHE II系统对加拿大重症监护病房患者的预测能力及医院治疗结果。
Crit Care Med. 1995 Jul;23(7):1177-83. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199507000-00005.
8
Long term survival after intensive care.重症监护后的长期生存
BMJ. 1990 Nov 17;301(6761):1127-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6761.1127.
9
Utility of illness severity scoring for prediction of prolonged surgical critical care.疾病严重程度评分对预测延长的外科重症监护的效用。
J Trauma. 1996 Apr;40(4):513-8; discussion 518-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199604000-00002.
10
[Predictive values of different critical scoring systems for mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory failure supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation].[不同危急评分系统对体外膜肺氧合支持下的严重急性呼吸衰竭患者死亡率的预测价值]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2016 Sep;39(9):698-703. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2016.09.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Serial evaluation of the serum lactate level with the SOFA score to predict mortality in patients with sepsis.连续评估血清乳酸水平与 SOFA 评分对脓毒症患者死亡率的预测价值。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 18;13(1):6351. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33227-7.
2
Sepsis 3 and the burns patient: do we need Sepsis 3.1?脓毒症3与烧伤患者:我们需要脓毒症3.1吗?
Scars Burn Heal. 2018 Aug 14;4:2059513118790658. doi: 10.1177/2059513118790658. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
3
Association between trends in clinical variables and outcome in intensive care patients with faecal peritonitis: analysis of the GenOSept cohort.

本文引用的文献

1
A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients.一种针对重症监护病房患者的简化急性生理学评分。
Crit Care Med. 1984 Nov;12(11):975-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198411000-00012.
2
APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II:一种疾病严重程度分类系统。
Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29.
3
Validation of a prognostic score in critically ill patients undergoing transport.在接受转运的重症患者中对一种预后评分的验证。
重症监护病房粪便性腹膜炎患者临床变量趋势与预后的关联:GenOSept队列分析
Crit Care. 2015 May 5;19(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0931-8.
4
Case mix, outcome and activity for patients with severe acute kidney injury during the first 24 hours after admission to an adult, general critical care unit: application of predictive models from a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme database.成年综合重症监护病房收治的严重急性肾损伤患者入院后首个24小时的病例组合、治疗结果及医疗活动:来自ICNARC病例组合项目数据库二次分析的预测模型应用
Crit Care. 2008;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. doi: 10.1186/cc7003. Epub 2008 Oct 13.
5
Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--I: Variations in case mix of adult admissions to general intensive care units and impact on outcome.重症监护协会在英国和爱尔兰开展的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)研究——I:成人入住综合重症监护病房病例组合的差异及其对预后的影响
BMJ. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):972-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6910.972.
6
Outcomes in intensive care.重症监护的治疗结果。
BMJ. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):953-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6910.953.
7
A clinical sickness score for the critically ill in Central Africa.
Intensive Care Med. 1989;15(7):467-70. doi: 10.1007/BF00255604.
8
Scoring and outcome audit systems relevant to emergency medicine.与急诊医学相关的评分和结果审计系统。
Arch Emerg Med. 1990 Mar;7(1):9-15. doi: 10.1136/emj.7.1.9.
9
Predicting outcome in critical care: the current status of the APACHE prognostic scoring system.危重症预后的预测:急性生理学及慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)预后评分系统的现状
Can J Anaesth. 1991 Apr;38(3):374-83. doi: 10.1007/BF03007629.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Aug 17;291(6493):432-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6493.432.
4
Physiologic abnormalities and outcome from acute disease. Evidence for a predictable relationship.生理异常与急性疾病的转归。存在可预测关系的证据。
Arch Intern Med. 1986 Jul;146(7):1389-96.
5
Severity scoring in intensive care.重症监护中的严重程度评分
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Jun 14;292(6535):1546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6535.1546.