School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland 4131, Australia.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland 4131, Australia; Gold Coast University Hospital, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia.
Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
Implementing Domestic and Family Violence (DFV) screening, support, and prevention within maternity services is becoming common practice but women's experiences of screening are not routinely evaluated.
(1) Explore pregnant women's experiences of routine DFV screening and perceptions of responses by midwives; and (2) undertake preliminary testing of three new tools.
Using a cross-sectional design, pregnant women (n = 210) attending an antenatal service were surveyed. Three new measures: beliefs about DFV screening; non-disclosure of DFV; and midwifery support were tested.
Most women (92.3% n = 194) recalled being screened. Twelve (5.8%) respondents had/were experiencing DFV. A quarter (24.1% n = 49) had experienced or witnessed violence in the home as a child. The scales were reliable and factor analysis established validity. Women reported positive beliefs (mean 35.38, SD 3.63 range 19-40) and views about midwifery support (mean 24.88, SD 3.08 range 18-30). There was less agreement about why some women do not disclose DFV (mean 21.97, SD 4.27, range 8-30). Women who experienced or witnessed violence as a child, or were experiencing violence now were less comfortable with screening. Comments (n = 75) revealed support for routine enquiry that was confidential, explained, and occurred in a trusting relationship.
Women were supportive of screening, but actual rates of disclosure were low. Women acknowledged the importance of screening but did not want their information shared.
Women value screening, even if DFV is not disclosed. Exploring women's experiences is central to ensuring quality care.
在妇产科服务中实施家庭暴力(DFV)筛查、支持和预防措施已成为常见做法,但并未对女性的筛查体验进行常规评估。
(1)探索孕妇对常规 DFV 筛查的体验以及对助产士反应的看法;(2)初步测试三种新工具。
采用横断面设计,对参加产前服务的孕妇(n=210)进行了调查。测试了三种新的工具:对 DFV 筛查的信念、对 DFV 的隐瞒以及助产士的支持。
大多数女性(92.3%,n=194)回忆起被筛查过。有 12 名(5.8%)受访者曾经历过/正在经历 DFV。四分之一(24.1%,n=49)在家庭中经历过或目睹过暴力。量表具有可靠性,且通过因子分析验证了其有效性。女性报告了对筛查的积极信念(平均 35.38,SD 3.63,范围 19-40)和对助产士支持的看法(平均 24.88,SD 3.08,范围 18-30)。但对于为什么有些女性不披露 DFV 的原因,女性的意见却不太一致(平均 21.97,SD 4.27,范围 8-30)。曾目睹或经历过儿童时期暴力的女性,或正在经历暴力的女性对筛查的接受度较低。评论(n=75)表明,她们支持例行询问,但希望询问过程是保密的、可解释的,并且发生在信任的关系中。
女性支持筛查,但实际披露率较低。女性承认筛查的重要性,但不希望分享她们的信息。
即使没有披露 DFV,女性也重视筛查。探索女性的体验是确保高质量护理的核心。