• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种改良的 Evans 蓝染色法,用于一致、准确地评估休眠孢子的活力。

An Improved Evans Blue Staining Method for Consistent, Accurate Assessment of Resting Spore Viability.

机构信息

Crop Diversification Centre South, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Brooks, AB T1R 1E6, Canada.

Crop Diversification Centre North, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, AB T5Y 6H3, Canada.

出版信息

Plant Dis. 2019 Sep;103(9):2330-2336. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0855-RE. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0855-RE
PMID:31298992
Abstract

Clubroot caused by is an important disease of brassica crops. The use of vital stains to determine the viability of resting spores can provide useful information regarding spore longevity, inoculum potential, or the efficacy of antimicrobial treatments. Evans blue is one example of a vital stain that has been reported to differentially stain viable and nonviable resting spores. Some previously published protocols using Evans blue to stain resting spores have not provided accurate or consistent results. In this study, we modified the Evans blue method by increasing the staining time to 8 h or more and evaluated resting spores after heat treatment at various combinations of temperature and time. Extending staining times significantly increased the numbers of stained resting spores up to 7 h, after which the numbers of stained spores did not change significantly ( = 96.88; ≤ 0.001). The accuracy of the modified method to discriminate viable and nonviable spores was evaluated in repeated experiments and by comparing the staining data with those derived from inoculation assays and propidium monoazide quantitative PCR (qPCR). The results demonstrated that the modified Evans blue staining method improved the accuracy and consistency of measurement of resting spore viability. Additionally, it was equivalent to the qPCR method for differentiating viable and nonviable spores ( = 99.84; ≤ 0.001) and confirmed in canola infection bioassays.

摘要

由 引起的根肿病是十字花科作物的一种重要病害。使用活体染料来确定休止孢子的活力可以提供有关孢子寿命、接种体潜力或抗菌处理效果的有用信息。吖啶橙是一种已被报道可区分活的和非活的休止孢子的活体染料的例子。一些以前发表的使用吖啶橙染色 休止孢子的方案没有提供准确或一致的结果。在这项研究中,我们通过将染色时间延长至 8 小时或更长时间来改进吖啶橙方法,并评估了在不同温度和时间组合下热处理后的 休止孢子。将染色时间延长至 7 小时以上,显著增加了染色休止孢子的数量,之后染色孢子的数量没有显著变化( = 96.88; ≤ 0.001)。通过重复实验和将染色数据与接种试验和吖啶橙单染定量 PCR(qPCR)得出的数据进行比较,评估了改进方法区分活孢子和非活孢子的准确性。结果表明,改进的吖啶橙染色方法提高了休止孢子活力测量的准确性和一致性。此外,它与 qPCR 方法在区分活孢子和非活孢子方面等效( = 99.84; ≤ 0.001),并在油菜感染生物测定中得到了验证。

相似文献

1
An Improved Evans Blue Staining Method for Consistent, Accurate Assessment of Resting Spore Viability.一种改良的 Evans 蓝染色法,用于一致、准确地评估休眠孢子的活力。
Plant Dis. 2019 Sep;103(9):2330-2336. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0855-RE. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
2
Methods for Assessment of Viability and Germination of Resting Spores.休眠孢子活力与萌发的评估方法
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jan 5;12:823051. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.823051. eCollection 2021.
3
Quantification of Resting Spores in Soils Using Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR).利用液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)定量土壤中的休眠孢子。
Plant Dis. 2020 Apr;104(4):1188-1194. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-19-0584-RE. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
4
Propidium Monoazide Improves Quantification of Resting Spores of Plasmodiophora brassicae with qPCR.单叠氮碘化丙啶通过定量聚合酶链反应提高了对芸薹根肿菌休眠孢子的定量分析。
Plant Dis. 2017 Mar;101(3):442-447. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-16-0715-RE. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
5
in Its Environment: Effects of Temperature and Light on Resting Spore Survival in Soil.在其环境中:温度和光照对土壤中休眠孢子存活的影响
Phytopathology. 2021 Oct;111(10):1743-1750. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-09-20-0415-R. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
6
Hard to Kill: Inactivation of Resting Spores Using Chemical Disinfectants.难以杀灭:化学消毒剂对休眠孢子的灭活作用。
Plant Dis. 2022 Jan;106(1):190-196. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-21-1055-RE. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
7
A Basic Guide to the Propagation and Manipulation of the Clubroot Pathogen, Plasmodiophora brassicae.《关于根肿菌(Plasmodiophora brassicae)传播与操控的基础指南》。
Curr Protoc. 2024 Apr;4(4):e1039. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.1039.
8
Plasmodiophora brassicae: a review of an emerging pathogen of the Canadian canola (Brassica napus) crop.芸薹根肿菌:一种加拿大油菜(甘蓝型油菜)作物新兴病原体的综述。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2012 Feb;13(2):105-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00729.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
9
Spatiotemporal Quantification of Inoculum in Relation to Clubroot Development Under Inoculated and Naturally Infested Field Conditions.接种和自然侵染田间条件下接种体与根肿病发展关系的时空定量。
Plant Dis. 2021 Nov;105(11):3636-3642. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-21-0653-RE. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
Alkaline treatment of resting spores prior to DNA extraction improves the purity of Plasmodiophora brassicae DNA.在提取DNA之前对休眠孢子进行碱性处理可提高芸薹根肿菌DNA的纯度。
J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Jun;149:120-122. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Clubroot resistant in cruciferous crops: recent advances in genes and QTLs identification and utilization.十字花科作物的根肿病抗性:基因和QTL鉴定与利用的最新进展
Hortic Res. 2025 Apr 16;12(7):uhaf105. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhaf105. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Evaluation of Amisulbrom Products for the Management of Clubroot of Canola ().用于管理油菜根肿病的环丙唑醇产品评估()。 (注:原文括号部分为空,译文保留括号)
Plants (Basel). 2023 Dec 21;13(1):28. doi: 10.3390/plants13010028.
3
Efficacy of strain X216 at controlling clubroot disease on oilseed rape.
X216菌株对油菜根肿病的防治效果。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Sep 19;14:1249813. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1249813. eCollection 2023.
4
Crop Rotation with Marigold Promotes Soil Bacterial Structure to Assist in Mitigating Clubroot Incidence in Chinese Cabbage.与万寿菊轮作可促进土壤细菌结构,有助于减轻大白菜根肿病发病率。
Plants (Basel). 2022 Sep 2;11(17):2295. doi: 10.3390/plants11172295.
5
Methods for Assessment of Viability and Germination of Resting Spores.休眠孢子活力与萌发的评估方法
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jan 5;12:823051. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.823051. eCollection 2021.
6
Current and Future Pathotyping Platforms for in Canada.加拿大目前及未来的致病型分类平台。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Jul 15;10(7):1446. doi: 10.3390/plants10071446.