• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)定量土壤中的休眠孢子。

Quantification of Resting Spores in Soils Using Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR).

机构信息

Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0X2, Canada.

出版信息

Plant Dis. 2020 Apr;104(4):1188-1194. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-19-0584-RE. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1094/PDIS-03-19-0584-RE
PMID:32065569
Abstract

, an obligate soilborne pathogen that causes clubroot on Brassica crops, is spreading rapidly in western Canada, threatening canola production in the region. Bioassays and molecular assays have been used to estimate the concentration of resting spores in soil, which can affect clubroot incidence and severity on crops. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a promising new approach for quantification of pathogen inoculum owing to its low sensitivity to inhibitors and consistency at low target concentrations. The objective of this study was to assess ddPCR against existing quantitative PCR (qPCR) for potential advantage and/or improvement in quantifying resting spores in soil. The new protocol enumerated resting spores accurately in spiked potting mix or soil samples ranging from 10 to 10 spores per gram. At a spore concentration ≥10 spores per gram, however, ddPCR became less accurate, with a tendency of overestimation. The protocol was validated by quantifying the resting spores in spiked brown, dark brown, and black soils using both ddPCR and qPCR simultaneously. These soil types are found commonly on the Canadian Prairies, and they vary in texture, pH, and organic content. ddPCR showed similar results among the different soil types, whereas qPCR often displayed lower counts for the same spore concentration, with the amplification of DNA inhibited completely in black soil samples. The inhibition can be removed by a 10-fold dilution of DNA samples. The results show that ddPCR can be a more versatile tool than qPCR for detection and quantification of resting spores in soil samples.

摘要

根肿菌是一种专性土壤病原菌,可引起十字花科作物的根肿病,在加拿大西部迅速传播,威胁该地区油菜的生产。生物测定和分子测定已被用于估计土壤中休眠孢子的浓度,这会影响作物上根肿病的发病率和严重程度。液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)是一种很有前途的新方法,可用于定量病原体接种体,因为它对抑制剂的敏感性低,在低靶浓度下一致性好。本研究的目的是评估 ddPCR 相对于现有的定量 PCR(qPCR)在定量土壤中休眠孢子方面的优势和/或改进。新方案在浓度为 10 至 10 个孢子/克的接种盆栽混合物或土壤样品中准确地计数休眠孢子。然而,在孢子浓度≥10 个孢子/克时,ddPCR 的准确性降低,存在高估的趋势。该方案通过同时使用 ddPCR 和 qPCR 定量添加到棕色、深棕色和黑色土壤中的休眠孢子进行了验证。这些土壤类型在加拿大草原上很常见,它们在质地、pH 值和有机含量方面存在差异。ddPCR 在不同土壤类型中显示出相似的结果,而 qPCR 通常显示出相同孢子浓度的较低计数,黑色土壤样品中的 DNA 扩增完全受到抑制。抑制作用可以通过 DNA 样品的 10 倍稀释来消除。结果表明,ddPCR 比 qPCR 更通用,可用于检测和定量土壤样品中的休眠孢子。

相似文献

1
Quantification of Resting Spores in Soils Using Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR).利用液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)定量土壤中的休眠孢子。
Plant Dis. 2020 Apr;104(4):1188-1194. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-19-0584-RE. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Plasmodiophora brassicae: a review of an emerging pathogen of the Canadian canola (Brassica napus) crop.芸薹根肿菌:一种加拿大油菜(甘蓝型油菜)作物新兴病原体的综述。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2012 Feb;13(2):105-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00729.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
3
Spatiotemporal Quantification of Inoculum in Relation to Clubroot Development Under Inoculated and Naturally Infested Field Conditions.接种和自然侵染田间条件下接种体与根肿病发展关系的时空定量。
Plant Dis. 2021 Nov;105(11):3636-3642. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-21-0653-RE. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
4
in Its Environment: Effects of Temperature and Light on Resting Spore Survival in Soil.在其环境中:温度和光照对土壤中休眠孢子存活的影响
Phytopathology. 2021 Oct;111(10):1743-1750. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-09-20-0415-R. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
5
A Loop-Mediated Isothermal DNA Amplification (LAMP) Assay for Detection of the Clubroot Pathogen .基于环介导等温扩增(LAMP)的方法检测根肿菌
Plant Dis. 2022 Jun;106(6):1730-1735. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-21-2430-RE. Epub 2022 May 5.
6
An Improved Evans Blue Staining Method for Consistent, Accurate Assessment of Resting Spore Viability.一种改良的 Evans 蓝染色法,用于一致、准确地评估休眠孢子的活力。
Plant Dis. 2019 Sep;103(9):2330-2336. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0855-RE. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
7
A Basic Guide to the Propagation and Manipulation of the Clubroot Pathogen, Plasmodiophora brassicae.《关于根肿菌(Plasmodiophora brassicae)传播与操控的基础指南》。
Curr Protoc. 2024 Apr;4(4):e1039. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.1039.
8
Alkaline treatment of resting spores prior to DNA extraction improves the purity of Plasmodiophora brassicae DNA.在提取DNA之前对休眠孢子进行碱性处理可提高芸薹根肿菌DNA的纯度。
J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Jun;149:120-122. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 16.
9
Propidium Monoazide Improves Quantification of Resting Spores of Plasmodiophora brassicae with qPCR.单叠氮碘化丙啶通过定量聚合酶链反应提高了对芸薹根肿菌休眠孢子的定量分析。
Plant Dis. 2017 Mar;101(3):442-447. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-16-0715-RE. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
10
First Report of Clubroot on Canola Caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae in North Dakota.北达科他州油菜根肿病由芸苔根肿菌引起的首次报道。
Plant Dis. 2014 Oct;98(10):1438. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-14-0430-PDN.

引用本文的文献

1
Clubroot resistant in cruciferous crops: recent advances in genes and QTLs identification and utilization.十字花科作物的根肿病抗性:基因和QTL鉴定与利用的最新进展
Hortic Res. 2025 Apr 16;12(7):uhaf105. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhaf105. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Resilience of Canola to (Clubroot) Pathotype 3H under Different Resistance Genes and Initial Inoculum Levels.不同抗性基因和初始接种水平下油菜对3H型(根肿病)致病型的抗性
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jun 2;13(11):1540. doi: 10.3390/plants13111540.
3
Production of Clubroot Standards Using a Recombinant Surrogate to Overcome Natural Genetic Variability.
利用重组替代物克服自然遗传变异性生产根肿病标准品。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;12(8):1690. doi: 10.3390/plants12081690.
4
Canola with Stacked Genes Shows Moderate Resistance and Resilience against a Field Population of (Clubroot) Pathotype X.具有叠加基因的油菜对X型(根肿病)致病型的田间种群表现出中等抗性和恢复力。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Feb 6;12(4):726. doi: 10.3390/plants12040726.
5
The clubroot pathogen Plasmodiophora brassicae: A profile update.根肿菌病原体芸薹根肿菌:概况更新。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2023 Feb;24(2):89-106. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13283. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
6
Current and Future Pathotyping Platforms for in Canada.加拿大目前及未来的致病型分类平台。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Jul 15;10(7):1446. doi: 10.3390/plants10071446.