• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Use of Smartphone Apps, Social Media, and Web-Based Resources to Support Mental Health and Well-Being: Online Survey.使用智能手机应用程序、社交媒体和基于网络的资源来支持心理健康和幸福:在线调查。
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Jul 12;6(7):e12546. doi: 10.2196/12546.
2
Co-Designing a Mobile App to Improve Mental Health and Well-Being: Focus Group Study.共同设计一款移动应用程序以改善心理健康和幸福感:焦点小组研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Feb 26;5(2):e18172. doi: 10.2196/18172.
3
Smartphone Users' Persuasion Knowledge in the Context of Consumer mHealth Apps: Qualitative Study.智能手机用户在消费者移动医疗应用背景下的说服知识:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 13;9(4):e16518. doi: 10.2196/16518.
4
Designing a Smartphone-Based Virtual Reality App for Relaxation: Qualitative Crossover Study.设计一款基于智能手机的虚拟现实放松应用程序:定性交叉研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 13;9:e62663. doi: 10.2196/62663.
5
Qualitative Study定性研究
6
Is India ready for mental health apps (MHApps)? A quantitative-qualitative exploration of caregivers' perspective on smartphone-based solutions for managing severe mental illnesses in low resource settings.印度是否准备好接受心理健康应用程序(MHApps)?在资源匮乏环境下,基于智能手机的解决方案来管理严重精神疾病,从照顾者的角度对这一问题进行定量-定性探索。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0203353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203353. eCollection 2018.
7
Young People's Use of Digital Health Technologies in the Global North: Narrative Review.年轻人在全球北方对数字健康技术的使用:叙事性综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e18286. doi: 10.2196/18286.
8
Understanding People's Use of and Perspectives on Mood-Tracking Apps: Interview Study.了解人们对情绪追踪应用程序的使用情况及看法:访谈研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Aug 11;8(8):e29368. doi: 10.2196/29368.
9
Ownership, Use of, and Interest in Digital Mental Health Technologies Among Clinicians and Young People Across a Spectrum of Clinical Care Needs: Cross-sectional Survey.临床医生和不同临床护理需求的年轻人对数字心理健康技术的所有权、使用情况及兴趣:横断面调查
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 May 11;9(5):e30716. doi: 10.2196/30716.
10
User Preferences and Design Recommendations for an mHealth App to Promote Cystic Fibrosis Self-Management.用户对促进囊性纤维化自我管理的移动医疗应用程序的偏好和设计建议。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Oct 24;2(4):e44. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3599.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward a Sociotechnical Ecosystem for Ethical Screening and Promotion of Mental Health and Well-Being.迈向用于道德筛查及促进心理健康和幸福的社会技术生态系统。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e64790. doi: 10.2196/64790.
2
Association between social media use and health promotion among individuals with depression and anxiety: Insights from the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey.社交媒体使用与抑郁和焦虑个体健康促进之间的关联:来自2017 - 2020年健康信息国家趋势调查的见解
J Mood Anxiety Disord. 2023 Jun 17;1:100006. doi: 10.1016/j.xjmad.2023.100006. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Exploring Mental Health Content Moderation and Well-Being Tools on Social Media Platforms: Walkthrough Analysis.探索社交媒体平台上的心理健康内容审核与幸福工具:流程分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 29;12:e69817. doi: 10.2196/69817.
4
Predicting digital contact tracing tool adoption during COVID-19 from the perspective of TAM: The role of trust, fear, privacy, anxiety, and social media.从技术接受模型的角度预测COVID-19期间数字接触追踪工具的采用:信任、恐惧、隐私、焦虑和社交媒体的作用。
Digit Health. 2025 May 5;11:20552076251336271. doi: 10.1177/20552076251336271. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Development of the Mobile Application to Prevent Suicide (MAPS), a Personalized Smartphone App for Suicide Prevention: Feedback from Individual Interviews.用于预防自杀的移动应用程序(MAPS)的开发,一款用于自杀预防的个性化智能手机应用程序:来自个人访谈的反馈
J Technol Hum Serv. 2024;42(2):156-172. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2024.2351416. Epub 2024 May 11.
6
A Longitudinal Goal Setting Model for Addressing Complex Personal Problems in Mental Health.一种用于解决心理健康复杂个人问题的纵向目标设定模型。
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2022 Nov;6(CSCW2). doi: 10.1145/3555160. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
7
Approaches to Tailoring Between-Session Mental Health Therapy Activities.定制疗程间心理健康治疗活动的方法。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2024 May;2024. doi: 10.1145/3613904.3642856. Epub 2024 May 11.
8
Public perception of psychiatry, psychology and mental health professionals: a 15-year analysis.公众对精神病学、心理学及心理健康专业人员的认知:一项为期15年的分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 30;15:1369579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1369579. eCollection 2024.
9
A Web-Based Intervention Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Family Caregivers of People With Dementia: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.基于接纳与承诺疗法的网络干预对痴呆患者家属的效果:混合方法可行性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Apr 4;7:e53489. doi: 10.2196/53489.
10
Predictors of initial engagement with an asynchronous cognitive behavioral stress management website among older women with nonmetastatic breast cancer.预测非转移性乳腺癌老年女性对异步认知行为压力管理网站初始参与度的因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jul 15;31(8):466. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07939-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Use of Multiple Mental Health Apps Within a Platform: Secondary Analysis of the IntelliCare Field Trial.探索在一个平台内使用多个心理健康应用程序:IntelliCare 现场试验的二次分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Mar 21;6(3):e11572. doi: 10.2196/11572.
2
Mental Health Mobile Phone App Usage, Concerns, and Benefits Among Psychiatric Outpatients: Comparative Survey Study.精神科门诊患者对心理健康手机应用程序的使用、担忧及益处:比较性调查研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Nov 16;5(4):e11715. doi: 10.2196/11715.
3
Current Regulation of Mobile Mental Health Applications.移动心理健康应用程序的现行监管
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2018 Jun;46(2):204-211. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003748-18.
4
Discovery of and Interest in Health Apps Among Those With Mental Health Needs: Survey and Focus Group Study.有心理健康需求者对健康应用程序的发现与兴趣:调查和焦点小组研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 11;20(6):e10141. doi: 10.2196/10141.
5
User Experience of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Apps for Depression: An Analysis of App Functionality and User Reviews.用于抑郁症的认知行为疗法应用程序的用户体验:应用程序功能与用户评论分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 6;20(6):e10120. doi: 10.2196/10120.
6
Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements.临床综述:精神健康智能手机应用程序的用户参与情况:证据、理论与改进。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):116-119. doi: 10.1136/eb-2018-102891. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
7
Mobile apps for mood tracking: an analysis of features and user reviews.用于情绪追踪的移动应用程序:功能与用户评论分析
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:495-504. eCollection 2017.
8
Managing and Controlling Stress Using mHealth: Systematic Search in App Stores.使用移动健康技术管理和控制压力:在应用商店中的系统搜索
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 May 9;6(5):e111. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8866.
9
Attitudes Toward e-Mental Health Services in a Community Sample of Adults: Online Survey.成年人社区样本对电子心理健康服务的态度:在线调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 19;20(2):e59. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9109.
10
Mental and Emotional Self-Help Technology Apps: Cross-Sectional Study of Theory, Technology, and Mental Health Behaviors.心理与情绪自助技术应用程序:理论、技术与心理健康行为的横断面研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Oct 17;4(4):e45. doi: 10.2196/mental.7262.

使用智能手机应用程序、社交媒体和基于网络的资源来支持心理健康和幸福:在线调查。

Use of Smartphone Apps, Social Media, and Web-Based Resources to Support Mental Health and Well-Being: Online Survey.

作者信息

Stawarz Katarzyna, Preist Chris, Coyle David

机构信息

Bristol Interaction Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Jul 12;6(7):e12546. doi: 10.2196/12546.

DOI:10.2196/12546
PMID:31301126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6659390/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Technology can play an important role in supporting mental health. Many studies have explored the effectiveness, acceptability, or context of use of different types of mental health technologies. However, existing research has tended to investigate single types of technology at a time rather than exploring a wider ecosystem that people may use. This narrow focus can limit our understanding of how we could best design mental health technologies.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate which technologies (smartphone apps, discussion forums and social media, and websites and Web-based programs) people use to support their mental health and why, whether they combine and use more than one technology, what purpose each technology serves, and which features people find the most valuable.

METHODS

We conducted an online survey to gather responses from members of the public who use technology to support their mental health and well-being. The survey was advertised on social media and via posters at a university. It explored usage patterns, frequently used features, and engagement with technology. To gain deeper insights into users' preferences, we also thematically analyzed open-ended comments about each technology type and suggestions for improvements provided by the respondents.

RESULTS

In total, 81 eligible participants completed the survey. Smartphone apps were the most commonly used technology, with 78% of the participants (63/81) using them, either alone (40%) or in combination with other technologies (38%). Each type of technology was used for specific purposes: apps provided guided activities, relaxation, and enabled tracking; social media and discussion forums allowed participants to learn from the experiences of others and use that knowledge to understand their own situation; and Web-based programs and websites helped to find out how to deal on a day-to-day basis with stress and anxiety. The analysis of open-ended responses showed that although many people valued technology and felt it could support targeted activities, it was not seen as a substitute for traditional face-to-face therapy. Participants wanted technology to be more sophisticated and nuanced, supporting personalized and actionable recommendations. There was evidence that participants mistrusted technology, irrespective of the type, and had broader concerns regarding the impact of overuse of technology.

CONCLUSIONS

People use different types of technology to support their mental health. Each can serve a specific purpose. Although apps are the most widely used technology, mixing and matching different types of technology is also common. Technology should not be seen as a replacement for traditional psychotherapy, rather it offers new opportunities to support mental health as part of an overall ecosystem. People want technology to be more nuanced and personalized to help them plan informed actions. Future interventions should explore the use of multiple technologies and their combined effects on mental health support.

摘要

背景

技术在支持心理健康方面可发挥重要作用。许多研究探讨了不同类型心理健康技术的有效性、可接受性或使用背景。然而,现有研究往往一次只调查单一类型的技术,而非探索人们可能使用的更广泛的生态系统。这种狭隘的关注点可能会限制我们对如何最好地设计心理健康技术的理解。

目的

本研究的目的是调查人们使用哪些技术(智能手机应用程序、讨论论坛和社交媒体以及网站和基于网络的程序)来支持他们的心理健康以及原因,他们是否会结合使用多种技术,每种技术的用途是什么,以及人们认为哪些功能最有价值。

方法

我们进行了一项在线调查,以收集使用技术来支持其心理健康和幸福感的公众的反馈。该调查在社交媒体上以及通过一所大学的海报进行宣传。它探讨了使用模式、常用功能以及与技术的互动情况。为了更深入地了解用户的偏好,我们还对关于每种技术类型的开放式评论以及受访者提供的改进建议进行了主题分析。

结果

共有81名符合条件的参与者完成了调查。智能手机应用程序是最常用的技术,78%的参与者(63/81)使用了它们,要么单独使用(40%),要么与其他技术结合使用(38%)。每种技术类型都用于特定目的:应用程序提供有指导的活动、放松并实现跟踪;社交媒体和讨论论坛使参与者能够从他人的经验中学习并利用这些知识来了解自己的情况;基于网络的程序和网站有助于了解如何在日常生活中应对压力和焦虑。对开放式回复的分析表明,尽管许多人重视技术并认为它可以支持有针对性的活动,但它并未被视为传统面对面治疗的替代品。参与者希望技术更加完善和细致入微,支持个性化且可操作的建议。有证据表明,参与者不信任技术,无论其类型如何,并且对技术过度使用的影响有更广泛的担忧。

结论

人们使用不同类型的技术来支持他们的心理健康。每种技术都可以服务于特定目的。尽管应用程序是使用最广泛的技术,但混合使用不同类型的技术也很常见。技术不应被视为传统心理治疗的替代品,相反,它作为整体生态系统的一部分,为支持心理健康提供了新的机会。人们希望技术更加细致入微和个性化,以帮助他们规划明智的行动。未来的干预措施应探索多种技术的使用及其对心理健康支持的综合影响。