• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让利益相关者参与评估国家生物多样性战略在减少洪水风险方面的有效性:一个用于效益和协同效益评估的参与式系统动力学模型。

Engaging stakeholders in the assessment of NBS effectiveness in flood risk reduction: A participatory System Dynamics Model for benefits and co-benefits evaluation.

作者信息

Pagano Alessandro, Pluchinotta Irene, Pengal Polona, Cokan Blaž, Giordano Raffaele

机构信息

Water Research Institute - National Research Council (IRSA-CNR), via F. de Blasio 5, 70132 Bari, Italy.

King's College London, Business School, London, UK.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 10;690:543-555. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.059. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.059
PMID:31301495
Abstract

There is an imperative worldwide need to identify effective approaches to deal with water-related risks, and mainly with increasingly frequent floods, as well as with severe droughts. Particularly, policy and decision-makers are trying to identify systemic strategies that, going beyond the mere risk reduction, should be capable to deal simultaneously with multiple challenges (such as climate resilience, health and well-being, quality of life), thus providing additional benefits. In this direction, the contribution of Nature Based Solutions (NBS) is relevant, although their wider implementation is still hampered by several barriers, such as the uncertainty and lack of information on their long-term behavior and the difficulty of quantitatively valuing their multidimensional impacts. The activities described in the present paper, carried out within the EU funded project NAIAD, mainly aim at developing a participatory System Dynamic Model capable to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of NBS to deal with flood risks, while producing a multiplicity of co-benefits. The adoption of a participatory approach supported both to increase the available knowledge and the awareness about the potential of NBS and hybrid measures (e.g. a combination of NBS and socio-institutional ones). Specific reference is made to one of the demos of the NAIAD project, namely the Glinščica river case study (Slovenia).

摘要

全球迫切需要确定应对与水相关风险的有效方法,主要是应对日益频繁的洪水以及严重干旱。特别是,政策制定者和决策者正在努力确定系统性战略,这些战略不仅要超越单纯的降低风险,还应能够同时应对多重挑战(如气候适应能力、健康与福祉、生活质量),从而带来额外益处。在这个方向上,基于自然的解决方案(NBS)的贡献是相关的,尽管其更广泛的实施仍受到若干障碍的阻碍,例如其长期行为的不确定性和信息缺乏,以及难以定量评估其多维度影响。本文所述活动是在欧盟资助的NAIAD项目内开展的,主要旨在开发一个参与式系统动力学模型,该模型能够定量评估基于自然的解决方案应对洪水风险的有效性,同时产生多种协同效益。采用参与式方法有助于增加可用知识,并提高对基于自然的解决方案和混合措施(如基于自然的解决方案与社会制度措施的结合)潜力的认识。特别提及了NAIAD项目的一个示范案例,即格利恩希察河案例研究(斯洛文尼亚)。

相似文献

1
Engaging stakeholders in the assessment of NBS effectiveness in flood risk reduction: A participatory System Dynamics Model for benefits and co-benefits evaluation.让利益相关者参与评估国家生物多样性战略在减少洪水风险方面的有效性:一个用于效益和协同效益评估的参与式系统动力学模型。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 10;690:543-555. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.059. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
2
Causal Loop Diagrams for supporting Nature Based Solutions participatory design and performance assessment.支持基于自然的解决方案参与式设计和绩效评估的因果关系图。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111668. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111668. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
3
Socio-hydrological modelling using participatory System Dynamics modelling for enhancing urban flood resilience through Blue-Green Infrastructure.利用参与式系统动力学建模进行社会水文建模,以通过蓝绿基础设施增强城市防洪能力。
J Hydrol (Amst). 2024 Jun;636:131248. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131248.
4
Assessing the long-term effectiveness of Nature-Based Solutions under different climate change scenarios.评估不同气候变化情景下基于自然的解决方案的长期有效性。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 10;794:148515. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148515. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
5
Assessing stakeholders' risk perception to promote Nature Based Solutions as flood protection strategies: The case of the Glinščica river (Slovenia).评估利益相关者对自然为本解决方案的风险认知,以促进其成为洪水防护策略:以 Glinščica 河(斯洛文尼亚)为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 10;655:188-201. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.116. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
6
Effectiveness of small- and large-scale Nature-Based Solutions for flood mitigation: The case of Ayutthaya, Thailand.小尺度和大尺度基于自然的解决方案在减轻洪灾方面的有效性:以泰国大城府为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:147725. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147725. Epub 2021 May 14.
7
Enhancing nature-based solutions acceptance through stakeholders' engagement in co-benefits identification and trade-offs analysis.通过利益相关者参与共同效益识别和权衡分析来增强基于自然的解决方案的接受度。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 15;713:136552. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136552. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Nature-based solutions efficiency evaluation against natural hazards: Modelling methods, advantages and limitations.基于自然的解决方案应对自然灾害的效率评估:建模方法、优点和局限性。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 25;784:147058. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147058. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
9
Knowledge gaps and future research needs for assessing the non-market benefits of Nature-Based Solutions and Nature-Based Solution-like strategies.评估基于自然的解决方案和类似基于自然的解决方案策略的非市场效益的知识差距和未来研究需求。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 1;841:156636. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156636. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
10
Economic assessment of nature-based solutions to reduce flood risk and enhance co-benefits.基于自然的解决方案的经济评估,以降低洪水风险并增强共同效益。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb 14;352:119985. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119985. Epub 2024 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Hydrology for impact: building partnerships, blending knowledge and bracing for climate change.影响水文:建立伙伴关系、融合知识与应对气候变化
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2025 Jul 31;383(2302):20240290. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2024.0290.
2
Exploring citizens' preferences for the temporal effectiveness of urban nature-based solutions through participatory GIS.通过参与式地理信息系统探索市民对基于自然的城市解决方案时间有效性的偏好。
NPJ Urban Sustain. 2025;5(1):44. doi: 10.1038/s42949-025-00229-5. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
3
Assessing nature-based coastal defense.
评估基于自然的海岸防御。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 14;15(1):16798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96744-7.
4
Evaluating the dynamics of fee-free higher education in South Africa: a causal loop diagram approach .评估南非免费高等教育的动态:一种因果循环图方法
F1000Res. 2025 Jan 20;13:780. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.152478.3. eCollection 2024.
5
Socio-hydrological modelling using participatory System Dynamics modelling for enhancing urban flood resilience through Blue-Green Infrastructure.利用参与式系统动力学建模进行社会水文建模,以通过蓝绿基础设施增强城市防洪能力。
J Hydrol (Amst). 2024 Jun;636:131248. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131248.
6
Participatory Causal Loop Diagrams Building for Supporting Decision-Makers Integrating Flood Risk Management in an Urban Regeneration Process.构建参与式因果循环图以支持决策者在城市更新过程中整合洪水风险管理
Earths Future. 2024 Jan;12(1):e2023EF003659. doi: 10.1029/2023EF003659. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
7
Application of group model building in implementation research: A systematic review of the public health and healthcare literature.群体模式构建在实施研究中的应用:公共卫生和医疗保健文献的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0284765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284765. eCollection 2023.
8
Urban resilience under the COVID-19 pandemic: A quantitative assessment framework based on system dynamics.新冠疫情下的城市韧性:基于系统动力学的定量评估框架
Cities. 2023 May;136:104265. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104265. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
9
A review of the flood management: from flood control to flood resilience.洪水管理综述:从防洪到洪水韧性
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 25;8(11):e11763. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11763. eCollection 2022 Nov.
10
A Bayesian Modelling Framework for Integration of Ecosystem Services into Freshwater Resources Management.一种将生态系统服务纳入淡水资源管理的贝叶斯建模框架。
Environ Manage. 2022 Apr;69(4):781-800. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01595-x. Epub 2022 Feb 16.