Suppr超能文献

估算伊朗克尔曼的年堕胎率:直接法、网络扩大法和单样本计数法的比较

Estimating The Annual Abortion Rate in Kerman, Iran: Comparison of Direct, Network Scale-Up, and Single Sample Count Methods.

作者信息

Zamanian Maryam, Zolala Farzaneh, Haghdoost Ali Akbar, Baneshi Mohammad Reza

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.

Modeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Fertil Steril. 2019 Oct;13(3):209-214. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2019.5721. Epub 2019 Jul 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abortion is a sensitive issue surrounded by social, cultural and religious stigmata. Therefore, estimation of its prevalence involves methodological challenges. The aim of this manuscript is to estimate the abortion prevalence, stratified by type, using a direct and two indirect methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was done in 2016, we recruited 1020 women aging 18-49 years. Three methods were applied to estimate the abortion prevalence: direct question, network scale-up (NSU), and single sample count (SSC). In the direct method, to guarantee anonymity, data were collected by means of a self-administered questionnaire. In other methods, data were collected through gender-matched street-based interviews.

RESULTS

The annual rate of abortion estimated by direct and NSU methods were 2 respectively 9 (10 intentional, 4 therapeutic and 15 spontaneous) and 23 (9 intentional, 3 therapeutic, and 11 spontaneous) per 1000 women aging 18- 49 years. The annual rate of intentional abortion estimated based on SSC method was higher (15 per 1000) women than other methods.

CONCLUSION

The present estimates are higher than previously reported ones. The results of three methods more or less supported each other confirming the internal validity of our estimates.

摘要

背景

堕胎是一个敏感问题,周围环绕着社会、文化和宗教的污名。因此,对其流行率的估计存在方法上的挑战。本手稿的目的是使用一种直接方法和两种间接方法,按类型对堕胎流行率进行分层估计。

材料与方法

这项横断面研究于2016年进行,我们招募了1020名年龄在18 - 49岁的女性。应用三种方法来估计堕胎流行率:直接询问法、网络扩大法(NSU)和单样本计数法(SSC)。在直接方法中,为保证匿名性,数据通过自填问卷收集。在其他方法中,数据通过按性别匹配的街头访谈收集。

结果

直接法和NSU法估计的18 - 49岁女性每1000人的年堕胎率分别为9例(10例人工流产、4例治疗性流产和15例自然流产)和23例(9例人工流产、3例治疗性流产和11例自然流产)。基于SSC法估计的人工流产年率(每1000人中有15例)高于其他方法。

结论

目前的估计高于先前报告的估计。三种方法的结果或多或少相互支持,证实了我们估计的内部有效性。

相似文献

5
Estimating the Annual Incidence of Abortions in Iran Applying a Network Scale-up Approach.应用网络扩大法估算伊朗的年度堕胎发生率
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Oct 5;16(10):e15765. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.15765. eCollection 2014 Oct.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Estimating the Annual Incidence of Abortions in Iran Applying a Network Scale-up Approach.应用网络扩大法估算伊朗的年度堕胎发生率
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Oct 5;16(10):e15765. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.15765. eCollection 2014 Oct.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验