Suppr超能文献

节食者的体重指数、食物渴望和失抑制进食是否会增加?荷兰饮食行为问卷中节食量表和节制饮食量表的比较。

Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the Restraint Scale and the Restrained Eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire.

作者信息

Adams Rachel C, Chambers Christopher D, Lawrence Natalia S

机构信息

CUBRIC, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, UK.

School of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):190174. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190174. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Despite being used interchangeably, different measures of restrained eating have been associated with different dietary behaviours. These differences have impeded replicability across the restraint literature and have made it difficult for researchers to interpret results and use the most appropriate measure for their research. Across a total sample of 1731 participants, this study compared the Restraint Scale (RS), and its subscales, to the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) across several traits related to overeating. The aim was to explore potential differences between these two questionnaires so that we could help to identify the most suitable measure as a prescreening tool for eating-related interventions. Results revealed that although the two measures are highly correlated with one another (s 0.73-0.79), the RS was more strongly associated with external (s = -0.07 to 0.11 versus -0.18 to -0.01) and disinhibited eating (s 0.46 versus 0.31), food craving (s 0.12-0.27 versus 0.02-0.13 and 0.22 versus -0.06) and body mass index (s 0.25-0.34 versus -0.13 to 0.15). The results suggest that, compared to the DEBQ, the RS is a more appropriate measure for identifying individuals who struggle the most to control their food intake.

摘要

尽管人们常常互换使用,但不同的节制饮食测量方法与不同的饮食行为相关。这些差异阻碍了节制饮食文献研究结果的可重复性,也让研究人员难以解释研究结果,难以选择最适合其研究的测量方法。在总共1731名参与者的样本中,本研究将节制量表(RS)及其子量表与荷兰饮食行为问卷(DEBQ)在与暴饮暴食相关的几个特征方面进行了比较。目的是探索这两种问卷之间的潜在差异,以便我们能够帮助确定最适合的测量方法,作为饮食相关干预措施的预筛选工具。结果显示,虽然这两种测量方法彼此高度相关(s = 0.73 - 0.79),但RS与外在饮食(s = -0.07至0.11,而DEBQ为-0.18至-0.01)、无节制饮食(s = 0.46,而DEBQ为0.31)、食物渴望(s = 0.12 - 0.27,而DEBQ为0.02 - 0.13以及s = 0.22,而DEBQ为-0.06)和体重指数(s = 0.25 - 0.34,而DEBQ为-0.13至0.15)的关联更强。结果表明,与DEBQ相比,RS是识别那些在控制食物摄入量方面最困难的个体的更合适的测量方法。

相似文献

2
Tendency toward overeating and restraint as predictors of food consumption.
Appetite. 2003 Jun;40(3):291-8. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00006-0.
4
The influence of restrained and external eating patterns on overeating.
Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.01.007. Epub 2007 Feb 11.
5
Success and failure in the measurement of restraint: notes and data.
Int J Eat Disord. 1999 May;25(4):441-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199905)25:4<441::aid-eat9>3.0.co;2-b.
6
Are common measures of dietary restraint and disinhibited eating reliable and valid in obese persons?
Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:344-51. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.226. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
7
Validation of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) in a sample of Spanish women.
Appetite. 2014 Feb;73:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
8
A comparison of the validity of three scales for the assessment of dietary restraint.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1989 Nov;98(4):504-7. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.98.4.504.
9
Emotions and eating. Self-reported and experimentally induced changes in food intake under stress.
Appetite. 2009 Apr;52(2):355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.11.007. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
10
Dietary restraint: intention versus behavior to restrict food intake.
Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Power of Food Scale during pregnancy and postpartum.
J Health Psychol. 2025 Apr 23:13591053251333244. doi: 10.1177/13591053251333244.
2
Action Interpretation Determines the Effects of Go/No-Go and Approach/Avoidance Actions on Stimulus Evaluation.
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Jul 19;8:898-923. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00151. eCollection 2024.
5
Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):307-337. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
6
Hunger modulates perceptions of food health but not taste in restricted eaters.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 6;14:1212778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212778. eCollection 2023.
7
A survey of eating styles in eight countries: Examining restrained, emotional, intuitive eating and their correlates.
Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Feb;28(1):136-155. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12616. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
9
Is It Worth It? Obesity Affects Snack Food Valuation Across the Menstrual Cycle.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 16;16:800976. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.800976. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta-analytic review.
Obes Rev. 2016 Feb;17(2):159-77. doi: 10.1111/obr.12354. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
3
External eating mediates the relationship between impulsivity and unhealthy food intake.
Physiol Behav. 2015 Aug 1;147:117-21. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.04.030. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
4
Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus-specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint.
Appetite. 2015 Feb;85:91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
5
The discrepancy between implicit and explicit attitudes in predicting disinhibited eating.
Eat Behav. 2014 Jan;15(1):164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.10.021. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
7
British English translation of the Food Craving Inventory (FCI-UK).
Appetite. 2013 Aug;67:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
8
Eating styles in the morbidly obese: restraint eating, but not emotional and external eating, predicts dietary behaviour.
Psychol Health. 2013;28(6):714-25. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2012.760033. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
9
Guilty pleasures II: restrained eaters' implicit preferences for high, moderate and low-caloric food.
Eat Behav. 2012 Aug;13(3):275-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验