MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Ethn Health. 2022 Jan;27(1):190-208. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2019.1643009. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
We compare rates of ill health and socioeconomic inequalities in health by ethnic groups in Scotland by age. We focus on ethnic differences in socioeconomic inequalities in health. There is little evidence of how socioeconomic inequalities in health vary by ethnicity, especially in Scotland, where health inequalities are high compared to other European countries. A cross-sectional study using the 2011 Scottish Census (population 5.3 million) was conducted. Directly standardized rates were calculated for two self-rated health outcomes (poor general health and limiting long-term illness) separately by ethnicity, age and small-area deprivation. Slope and relative indices of inequality were calculated to measure socioeconomic inequalities in health. The results show that the White Scottish population tend to have worse health and higher socioeconomic inequalities in health than many other ethnic groups, while White Polish and Chinese people tend to have better health and low socioeconomic inequalities in health. These results are more salient for ages 30-44. The Pakistani population has high rates of poor health similar to the White Scottish for ages 15-44, but at ages 45 and above Pakistani people have the highest rates of poor self-rated health. Compared to other ethnicities, Pakistani people are also more likely to experience poor health in the least deprived areas, particularly at ages 45 and above. There are statistically significant and substantial differences in poor self-rated health and in socioeconomic inequalities in health between ethnicities. Rates of ill health vary between ethnic groups at any age. The better health of the younger minority population should not be taken as evidence of better health outcomes in later life. Since socioeconomic gradients in health vary by ethnicity, policy interventions for health improvement in Scotland that focus only on deprived areas may inadvertently exclude minority populations.
我们比较了苏格兰不同年龄组不同族裔人群的健康不良率和健康不平等现象,并将重点放在健康不平等现象的社会经济差异上。目前几乎没有证据表明,社会经济不平等现象会因族裔而异,尤其是在苏格兰,与其他欧洲国家相比,苏格兰的健康不平等现象更为严重。本研究采用 2011 年苏格兰人口普查(530 万人口)进行了横断面研究。分别按族裔、年龄和小区域贫困程度计算了两种自评健康结果(一般健康状况不佳和长期疾病受限)的直接标准化率。计算了斜率和相对不平等指数,以衡量健康的社会经济不平等现象。结果表明,与许多其他族裔群体相比,苏格兰白人的健康状况较差,社会经济不平等现象更为严重,而白波兰人和中国人的健康状况较好,社会经济不平等现象较低。这些结果在 30-44 岁年龄组中更为明显。15-44 岁的巴基斯坦人口的健康不良率与苏格兰白人相似,但在 45 岁及以上的人群中,巴基斯坦人口的健康不良率最高。与其他族裔群体相比,巴基斯坦人在最不贫困的地区也更有可能出现健康不良状况,尤其是在 45 岁及以上的人群中。不同族裔之间在自评健康不良和社会经济不平等现象方面存在统计学意义上的显著且显著的差异。任何年龄组的族裔群体的健康不良率都存在差异。年轻少数族裔人群的健康状况较好,不应被视为晚年健康结果更好的证据。由于健康方面的社会经济梯度因族裔而异,因此,苏格兰改善健康的政策干预措施如果只关注贫困地区,可能会无意中排斥少数民族。