Carlin Caroline, David Guy
Medica Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN.
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Perm J. 2019;23. doi: 10.7812/TPP/18-173. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
Prior literature has focused on the impact of informal caregiving (presence of a family member in the home or nearby) on caregiver employment, but little research has analyzed the impact of informal caregiving on health care utilization patterns.
To study the effect of informal caregivers on postacute care and recovery of Medicare patients.
We used cross-sectional Health Plan administrative data to measure differences in health care utilization for Medicare patients who did and did not have coresident adult caregivers available. We identified coresident caregivers as those residing at the same postal address as discharged patients. Analysis was a combination of Poisson and logit models.
Length of hospitalization, type of hospitalization (ambulatory-care sensitive vs not), likelihood of discharge to postacute care (skilled nursing facility or home health), and likelihood of hospital readmission and postdischarge Emergency Department visits.
Patients with caregivers were discharged after shorter hospital lengths of stay and were less likely to require postacute emergency care, home health services, or discharge to skilled nursing facilities. Savings were smaller when caregivers were younger, in poor health, or female. We extrapolated the reduced utilization associated with a coresidential caregiver to estimate Medicare savings of $514 million in 2015.
By calculating the impact of informal caregiving on patterns of health care utilization, we support the need to integrate the availability of caregivers into discharge planning. Future quantification of differences by caregiver characteristics is important.
先前的文献聚焦于非正式照护(家中或附近有家庭成员)对照护者就业的影响,但很少有研究分析非正式照护对医疗保健利用模式的影响。
研究非正式照护者对医疗保险患者急性后期护理和康复的影响。
我们使用横断面健康计划管理数据,来衡量有和没有成年同住照护者的医疗保险患者在医疗保健利用方面的差异。我们将同住照护者定义为与出院患者居住在同一邮政地址的人。分析采用泊松模型和逻辑模型相结合的方法。
住院时长、住院类型(非门诊护理敏感型与门诊护理敏感型)、出院后接受急性后期护理(专业护理机构或家庭健康护理)的可能性、再次住院的可能性以及出院后到急诊科就诊的可能性。
有照护者的患者住院时间较短,且不太可能需要急性后期紧急护理、家庭健康服务或转至专业护理机构。当照护者较年轻、健康状况较差或为女性时,节省的费用较少。我们推断与同住照护者相关的利用率降低情况,以估计2015年医疗保险节省了5.14亿美元。
通过计算非正式照护对医疗保健利用模式的影响,我们支持将照护者的可获得性纳入出院计划的必要性。未来按照护者特征对差异进行量化很重要。