Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Anatomy, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 1;201:116014. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116014. Epub 2019 Jul 14.
The combination of diffusion MRI (dMRI) with microscopy provides unique opportunities to study microstructural features of tissue, particularly when acquired in the same sample. Microscopy is frequently used to validate dMRI microstructure models, addressing the indirect nature of dMRI signals. Typically, these modalities are analysed separately, and microscopy is taken as a gold standard against which dMRI-derived parameters are validated. Here we propose an alternative approach in which we combine dMRI and microscopy data obtained from the same tissue sample to drive a single, joint model. This simultaneous analysis allows us to take advantage of the breadth of information provided by complementary data acquired from different modalities. By applying this framework to a spherical-deconvolution analysis, we are able to overcome a known degeneracy between fibre dispersion and radial diffusion. Spherical-deconvolution based approaches typically estimate a global fibre response function to determine the fibre orientation distribution in each voxel. However, the assumption of a 'brain-wide' fibre response function may be challenged if the diffusion characteristics of white matter vary across the brain. Using a generative joint dMRI-histology model, we demonstrate that the fibre response function is dependent on local anatomy, and that current spherical-deconvolution based models may be overestimating dispersion and underestimating the number of distinct fibre populations per voxel.
弥散磁共振成像(dMRI)与显微镜结合提供了研究组织微观结构特征的独特机会,特别是在同一样本中采集时。显微镜通常用于验证 dMRI 微观结构模型,解决 dMRI 信号的间接性质。通常,这些模态是分开分析的,并且将显微镜作为 dMRI 衍生参数的验证的金标准。在这里,我们提出了一种替代方法,我们将从同一组织样本获得的 dMRI 和显微镜数据结合起来,驱动单个联合模型。这种同时分析使我们能够利用从不同模态获得的互补数据提供的广泛信息。通过将该框架应用于球谐反卷积分析,我们能够克服纤维分散和径向扩散之间已知的退化。基于球谐反卷积的方法通常估计全局纤维响应函数,以确定每个体素中的纤维方向分布。然而,如果大脑中的白质的扩散特征不同,那么“大脑范围”纤维响应函数的假设可能会受到挑战。使用生成式联合 dMRI-组织学模型,我们证明纤维响应函数取决于局部解剖结构,并且当前基于球谐反卷积的模型可能高估了分散度并低估了每个体素中不同纤维群体的数量。