Sharma Abhishek, Rorden Lindsey, Ewen Margaret, Laing Richard
Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA ; Center for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA ; Precision Health Economics, Boston, MA USA.
Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016 Apr 5;9:12. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0059-5. eCollection 2016.
Many patients even those with health insurance pay out-of-pocket for medicines. We investigated the availability and prices of essential medicines in the Boston area.
Using the WHO/HAI methodology, availability and undiscounted price data for both originator brand (OB) and lowest price generic (LPG) equivalent versions of 25 essential medicines (14 prescription; 11 over-the-counter (OTC)) were obtained from 17 private pharmacies. The inclusion and prices of 26 essential medicines in seven pharmacy discount programs were also studied. The medicine prices were compared with international reference prices (IRPs).
In surveyed pharmacies, the OB medicines were less available as compared to the generics. The OB and LPG versions of OTC medicines were 21.33 and 11.53 times the IRP, respectively. The median prices of prescription medicines were higher, with OB and LPG versions at 158.14 and 38.03 times the IRP, respectively. In studied pharmacy discount programs, the price ratios of surveyed medicines varied from 4.4-13.9.
While noting the WHO target that consumers should pay no more than four times the IRPs, medicine prices were considerably higher in the Boston area. The prices for medicines included in the pharmacy discount programs were closest to WHO's target. Consumers should shop around, as medicine inclusion and prices vary across discount programs. In order for consumers to identify meaningful potential savings through comparison shopping, price transparency is needed.
许多患者,甚至是那些有医疗保险的患者,都需要自掏腰包购买药品。我们调查了波士顿地区基本药物的可获得性和价格。
采用世界卫生组织/卫生行动信息中心(WHO/HAI)的方法,从17家私人药店获取了25种基本药物(14种处方药;11种非处方药(OTC))的原研品牌(OB)和最低价仿制药(LPG)等效版本的可获得性和未打折价格数据。还研究了七个药房折扣计划中26种基本药物的纳入情况和价格。将药品价格与国际参考价格(IRP)进行比较。
在接受调查的药店中,与仿制药相比,原研药的可获得性较低。非处方药的原研品牌和最低价仿制药版本分别是国际参考价格的21.33倍和11.53倍。处方药的中位数价格更高,原研品牌和最低价仿制药版本分别是国际参考价格的158.14倍和38.03倍。在研究的药房折扣计划中,被调查药品的价格比在4.4至13.9之间。
虽然注意到世界卫生组织设定的消费者支付价格不应超过国际参考价格四倍的目标,但波士顿地区的药品价格要高得多。药房折扣计划中包含的药品价格最接近世界卫生组织的目标。消费者应该货比三家,因为不同折扣计划中药品的纳入情况和价格各不相同。为了让消费者通过比较购物确定有意义的潜在节省金额,需要价格透明度。