Lehmann Douglas, Li Yun, Saran Rajiv, Li Yi
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stat Biosci. 2017 Dec;9(2):320-338. doi: 10.1007/s12561-016-9149-9. Epub 2016 May 26.
Instrumental variable (IV) methods are widely used to deal with the issue of unmeasured confounding and are becoming popular in health and medical research. IV models are able to obtain consistent estimates in the presence of unmeasured confounding, but rely on assumptions that are hard to verify and often criticized. An instrument is a variable that influences or encourages individuals toward a particular treatment without directly affecting the outcome. Estimates obtained using instruments with a weak influence over the treatment are known to have larger small-sample bias and to be less robust to the critical IV assumption that the instrument is randomly assigned. In this work, we propose a weighting procedure for strengthening the instrument while matching. Through simulations, weighting is shown to strengthen the instrument and improve robustness of resulting estimates. Unlike existing methods, weighting is shown to increase instrument strength without compromising match quality. We illustrate the method in a study comparing mortality between kidney dialysis patients receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis as treatment for end-stage renal disease.
工具变量(IV)方法被广泛用于处理未测量混杂因素的问题,并且在健康和医学研究中越来越受欢迎。IV模型能够在存在未测量混杂因素的情况下获得一致的估计值,但依赖于难以验证且经常受到批评的假设。一个工具变量是一个影响或促使个体接受特定治疗而不直接影响结果的变量。已知使用对治疗影响较弱的工具变量获得的估计值具有更大的小样本偏差,并且对工具变量是随机分配这一关键IV假设的稳健性较差。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种在匹配时增强工具变量的加权程序。通过模拟表明,加权可以增强工具变量并提高所得估计值的稳健性。与现有方法不同,加权在不影响匹配质量的情况下增强了工具变量的强度。我们在一项比较接受血液透析或腹膜透析作为终末期肾病治疗的肾透析患者死亡率的研究中说明了该方法。