• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作-家庭平衡政策对增强社会可持续性的作用:对 20 至 30 岁韩国人的选择实验分析。

The Role of Work-Family Balance Policy for Enhancing Social Sustainability: A Choice Experiment Analysis of Koreans in their Twenties and Thirties.

机构信息

Department of Advanced Industry Fusion, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-701, Korea.

Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong-si 30147, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 17;16(14):2553. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142553.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16142553
PMID:31319561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6678399/
Abstract

Korea is facing problems, such as inequality within society and an aging population, that places a burden on public health expenditure. The active adoption of policies that promote work-family balance (WFB), such as parental leave and workplace childcare centers, is known to help solve these problems. However, there has, as yet, been little quantitative evidence accumulated to support this notion. This study used the choice experiment methodology on 373 Koreans in their twenties and thirties, to estimate the level of utility derived from work-family balance policies. The results show that willingness to pay for parental leave was found to be valued at 7.81 million Korean won, while it was 4.83 million won for workplace childcare centers. In particular, WFB policies were found to benefit workers of lower socioeconomic status or belonging to disadvantaged groups, such as women, those with low education levels, and those with low incomes. Furthermore, the utility derived from WFB policies was found to be greater among those who desire children compared to those who do not. The results suggest that the proactive introduction of WFB policies will help solve problems such as inequality within society and population aging.

摘要

韩国面临着一些问题,如社会不平等和人口老龄化,这些问题给公共卫生支出带来了负担。积极采取促进工作-家庭平衡(WFB)的政策,如育儿假和工作场所儿童保育中心,被认为有助于解决这些问题。然而,目前还没有多少定量证据支持这一观点。本研究使用选择实验方法对 373 名 20 多岁和 30 多岁的韩国人进行了调查,以估计工作-家庭平衡政策带来的效用水平。结果表明,愿意为育儿假支付的费用被认为价值 781 万韩元,而工作场所儿童保育中心的费用为 483 万韩元。特别是,WFB 政策对社会经济地位较低或属于弱势群体的工人有利,如女性、教育水平较低者和收入较低者。此外,与不想要孩子的人相比,想要孩子的人从 WFB 政策中获得的效用更大。研究结果表明,积极推行 WFB 政策将有助于解决社会不平等和人口老龄化等问题。

相似文献

1
The Role of Work-Family Balance Policy for Enhancing Social Sustainability: A Choice Experiment Analysis of Koreans in their Twenties and Thirties.工作-家庭平衡政策对增强社会可持续性的作用:对 20 至 30 岁韩国人的选择实验分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 17;16(14):2553. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142553.
2
The Impact of Parental and Medical Leave Policies on Socioeconomic and Health Outcomes in OECD Countries: A Systematic Review of the Empirical Literature.经合组织国家中父母和医疗假政策对社会经济和健康结果的影响:对实证文献的系统回顾。
Milbank Q. 2018 Sep;96(3):434-471. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12340.
3
Who benefits from social investment? The gendered effects of family and employment policies on cardiovascular disease in Europe.谁从社会投资中受益?家庭和就业政策对欧洲心血管疾病的性别影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Mar;73(3):206-213. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211283. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
4
The impact of labor policies on the health of young children in the context of economic globalization.经济全球化背景下劳工政策对幼儿健康的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:355-72. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114358. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
5
Work-Life Balance: Weighing the Importance of Work-Family and Work-Health Balance.工作-生活平衡:权衡工作-家庭和工作-健康平衡的重要性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 1;17(3):907. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030907.
6
Funding child rearing: child allowance and parental leave.抚养子女的资金支持:儿童津贴与育儿假。
Future Child. 1996 Summer-Fall;6(2):122-36; discussion 137-45.
7
The determinants of time off work after childbirth.产后缺勤的决定因素。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000 Jun;25(3):527-64. doi: 10.1215/03616878-25-3-527.
8
[Inequalities in health in Italy].[意大利的健康不平等现象]
Epidemiol Prev. 2004 May-Jun;28(3 Suppl):i-ix, 1-161.
9
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
10
Changing families, changing workplaces.家庭在变,工作场所也在变。
Future Child. 2011 Fall;21(2):15-36. doi: 10.1353/foc.2011.0013.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences and Perspectives of Female Employees Regarding Work-Family Balance Following Maternity Leave: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Southeastern Iran.伊朗东南部女性员工休产假后工作与家庭平衡的经历与观点:一项横断面调查
Int J Prev Med. 2024 Dec 28;15:76. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_261_23. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of workplaces receiving "accreditation of health workplaces" on breastfeeding promotion, parental leave, and gender equality.“健康职场认证”对促进母乳喂养、父母假和性别平等的影响。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12140. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12140.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's employment and fertility: a welfare regime paradox.女性就业与生育:福利制度悖论
Soc Sci Res. 2009 Mar;38(1):103-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.08.005.
2
Career involvement and family involvement as moderators of relationships between work-family conflict and withdrawal from a profession.职业参与和家庭参与作为工作-家庭冲突与职业退出之间关系的调节变量
J Occup Health Psychol. 2001 Apr;6(2):91-100.