Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Queen Square Institute of Neurology University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mov Disord. 2019 Jul;34(7):936-949. doi: 10.1002/mds.27736. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
A large number of methods have been described that use transcranial magnetic stimulation to probe the physiology of the human motor cortex. Since the 1990s, hundreds of papers have used them to investigate neurophysiological signatures of different types of movement disorders. However, in recent years there has been increasing recognition of the interindividual variability of these measures and a focus on estimating their reliability and reproducibility. Although this work has been carried out in healthy individuals, it is highly relevant to movement disorders because it may impact the validity of some accepted ("canonical") neurophysiological biomarkers. The aim of this review is to reexamine the diagnostic usefulness of transcranial magnetic stimulation methods in movement disorders in the context of present knowledge of methodological variability.
We conducted a search of the PubMed database for research and review articles on transcranial magnetic stimulation and its diagnostic utility in movement disorders (specifically Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonism, dystonia, Tourette syndrome and other chronic tic disorders, Huntington's disease, and essential tremor). We highlighted contradictions in the literature and common misconceptions with the aim of providing a clearer picture of the reliability of these measures in differential diagnosis of movement disorders.
Although there is no doubt that these studies have provided useful insight into the pathophysiology of movement disorders, there is a clear disagreement among many studies that questions the validity of some of the so called "canonical" findings as diagnostic markers. However, useful findings remain and even those with higher variability can be used to support clinical diagnosis in selected cases. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
已经有大量的方法被描述出来,这些方法使用经颅磁刺激来探测人类运动皮层的生理学。自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,已经有数百篇论文使用这些方法来研究不同类型运动障碍的神经生理特征。然而,近年来,人们越来越认识到这些测量方法的个体间变异性,并关注估计其可靠性和可重复性。尽管这项工作是在健康个体中进行的,但它与运动障碍高度相关,因为它可能会影响一些被接受的(“经典”)神经生理生物标志物的有效性。本综述的目的是重新审视经颅磁刺激方法在运动障碍中的诊断有用性,同时考虑到目前对方法学变异性的认识。
我们在 PubMed 数据库中搜索了关于经颅磁刺激及其在运动障碍(特别是帕金森病和非典型帕金森病、肌张力障碍、图雷特综合征和其他慢性抽动障碍、亨廷顿病和原发性震颤)中的诊断效用的研究和综述文章。我们强调了文献中的矛盾和常见误解,旨在更清楚地了解这些测量方法在运动障碍鉴别诊断中的可靠性。
尽管毫无疑问,这些研究为运动障碍的病理生理学提供了有用的见解,但许多研究之间存在明显的分歧,这使得一些所谓的“经典”发现作为诊断标志物的有效性受到质疑。然而,仍然存在有用的发现,即使是那些变异性较高的发现也可以用于支持特定病例的临床诊断。 © 2019 国际帕金森病和运动障碍协会。