Potter Kathryn, de Koning Lawrence, Butzner J Decker, Gidrewicz Dominica
Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Jul 19;19(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1621-5.
Appropriate interpretation of a positive celiac antibody test by an ordering physician is important in order to institute proper management. We evaluated why children with an initial positive celiac serology were not referred for diagnostic biopsy or followed with serial testing by the ordering physician.
Consecutive celiac serologies in all patients less than 18 years of age were evaluated over 3.5 years and 775 children with a positive tissue transglutaminase antibody (TTG) were identified. If no management of a positive TTG could be identified, a survey was sent to the ordering physician. Responses were categorized as appropriate or inappropriate management.
Of the 775 patients with a positive TTG, 193 (24.9%, 95% CI 21.9-28.1%) received no follow-up management. We contacted 173 ordering physicians and 120 (69%) responded. Of the 120 responses, 55 patients (45.8%, 95% CI 36.8-55.1%) were managed appropriately and 46 (38.3%, 95% CI 29.7-47.7%) were considered to be inappropriately managed when no repeat TTG was obtained within 18 months. Reasons for inappropriate management included: screen considered to be false positive (44.7%), patient was not experiencing symptoms of celiac disease (31.6%), symptoms had resolved (15.8%), results were not indicative of celiac disease (26.3%) and patients started a gluten-free diet with no evaluation of response (15.8%). In 19 patients the TTG was not acted upon for technical reasons.
Positive TTGs require appropriate interventions. These include: subspecialist referral for further evaluation and/or repeat testing to evaluate: 1) treatment response or 2) patients with minimal or no symptoms.
为了进行恰当的管理,开单医生对乳糜泻抗体检测呈阳性结果进行恰当解读很重要。我们评估了为何初次乳糜泻血清学检测呈阳性的儿童未被转介进行诊断性活检,或未接受开单医生的系列检测随访。
在3.5年的时间里,对所有18岁以下患者的连续乳糜泻血清学检测结果进行评估,共识别出775名组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体(TTG)呈阳性的儿童。如果无法确定对TTG阳性结果的管理措施,则向开单医生发送一份调查问卷。回复被分类为恰当管理或不恰当管理。
在775名TTG呈阳性的患者中,193名(24.9%,95%置信区间21.9 - 28.1%)未接受后续管理。我们联系了173名开单医生,120名(69%)回复。在这120份回复中,55名患者(45.8%,95%置信区间36.8 - 55.1%)得到了恰当管理,46名(38.3%,95%置信区间29.7 - 47.7%)在未在18个月内复查TTG时被认为管理不恰当。管理不恰当的原因包括:筛查结果被认为是假阳性(44.7%)、患者未出现乳糜泻症状(31.6%)、症状已缓解(15.8%)、结果不提示乳糜泻(26.3%)以及患者在未评估反应的情况下开始了无麸质饮食(15.8%)。有19名患者因技术原因未对TTG采取行动。
TTG阳性需要采取恰当的干预措施。这些措施包括:转介给专科医生进行进一步评估和/或重复检测,以评估:1)治疗反应;2)症状轻微或无症状的患者。